Примери за използване на Greening requirements на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
We analysed the extent to which the LPIS can serve to monitor these greening requirements.
As we have previously indicated, the greening requirements are undemanding and largely reflect usual farming practice.
We found that around one third of the operation types in our sample included commitments overlapping with greening requirements.
The new greening architecture of the CAP with greening requirements in Pillar I influences rural development.
Nor, in most cases, was there any need to do so,because the baseline during the previous period had already exceeded the greening requirements.
This was either because the holdings concerned already met the greening requirements in 2014 or because they were exempt.
The agri-environment-climate measure is not the only rural development measure which can overlap with greening requirements.
This is compulsory and failure to respect the Greening requirements will result in penalties which go beyond the Greening payment, i.e.
However, smaller holdings can benefit from support under greening without having to meet all, or even any, of greening requirements.
Actions supported under those greening requirements cannot be subject to agri-environment-climate payments in order to avoid double funding.
As part of our testing of 121 direct payments, we visited 35 beneficiaries receiving greening payments;only in one case did we find a direct breach of the greening requirements.
It indeed reflects the area on which all greening requirements apply in complementarity and synergy i.a. with other measures such as GAEC and AECM.
The Commission, as always, is ready to support farmers affected by drought using a number of instruments, including higher advance payments,derogations from greening requirements and state aid.
Additionally, according to a JRC study,new greening requirements relating to permanent grassland resulted in a change in farming practices on only 1.5% of EU farmland.
While it is true that, for the sake of the simplification of the management of the scheme, certain farmers are exempted,the area concerned by greening requirements remains significant even in countries where exemptions are more frequent.
While indeed the greening requirements do not affect all farmers, the available information also shows that 72% of the total agricultural area is concerned, which is even more relevant with regard to climate action.
Commission recently decided to assist affected member states by derogating from greening requirements and by receiving direct and rural development payments in advance.
Derogations from specific greening requirements, namely crop diversification and ecological focus area rules on land lying fallow, to allow such land to be used for the production of animal feed.
In its‘Review of Greening after one year'60 the Commission proposed simplifying and harmonising certain greening requirements, wherever this could be done without lowering the environmental benefits.
The changes relate mainly to the new manda- tory greening requirements which tie an additional 30% on top of the basic pay- ment to certain practices which are potentially beneficial for the climate and the environment throughout the EU.
In light of the extreme drought, the European Commission recently decided to assist affected member states by derogating from greening requirements and by receiving direct and rural development payments in advance.
Greening requirements also do not apply to holdings considered‘green by definition': for example, organic farmers benefit from the green payment without having to demonstrate compliance with the three greening practices.
Most of the deadweight in greening is due to the modesty of greening requirements, which generally reflect the normal farming practice. This is particularly the case for crop diversification.
The greening requirements encompass three farming practices, all of which are meant to be simple, generalised, non-contractual and annual, and to benefit the environment and climate:(a) Under crop diversification, farmers with more than 10 hectares of arable land are obliged to grow at least two crops.
The large proportion of Utilised Agricultural Area(UAA)covered by the greening requirements(Ecological Focus Area, permanent grassland protection and crop diversification) highlights the potential of the greening to widely address issues.
Figure 4- Greening requirements apply to a minority of EU agricultural holdings, but these holdings cover most of EU farmland farmland holdings 100% 25 100% 100% 86% 73% 67% 24% EU farmland 150 Mha EU farmland under CAP 129 Mha EU farmland on holdings with at least one greening obligation 110 Mha 0% total EU under CAP with greening obligation(s) Source: ECA based on European Commission's data(without France- data not submitted).
This means that, in this particular case, the greening requirement for three crops is in fact included in the Pillar II baseline.
Regarding EFAs, we found that in Poland, various farming practices andfeatures that were already in place in 2014 would have covered the greening requirement with 30% to spare.
For EFAs, the maximum share of arable land on which farming practice may have had to change was limited to 5%(where a farmer without any EFAs in 2014 introduced new EFAs on the farm in order tomeet the 5% greening requirement in 2015).