Примери за използване на Groups of exporting producers на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Eighteen groups of exporting producers in Turkey provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
On the income tax statement of two sampled exporting producers/groups of exporting producers there is an amount exempted from income tax.
Two groups of exporting producers and one individual exporting producer requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b)of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadline.
Another two Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers submitted the requested information at a later stage.
As it was explained in recitals 16 and 18 above, out of the 23 Chinese exporting producers/group of exporting producers thatcooperated in the investigation, the Commission selected a sample comprising of the five largest exporting producers/groups of exporting producers which was considered representative within the meaning of Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Ten exporting producers or groups of exporting producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Furthermore, while the complainant refers to production rather than exports to the Union,it is noted that the Commission does not need to provide the volume of PSF produced by the sampled Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers as the purpose of the current proceeding is the assessment of subsidisation in relation to the volume of PSF produced in China and exported to the Union.
Initially 23 exporting producers/groups of exporting producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
The below schemes were found not to be used by the sampled Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers during the investigation period and therefore no benefit could be established.
The cooperating exporting producers/groups of exporting producers have reported information regarding the land they hold as well as the relevant land-use rights contracts/certificates, but no information was provided by the GOC about pricing of land-use rights.
In Recital 21 of the provisional Regulation the Commission noted that three groups of exporting producers in the PRC requested individual treatment under Article 17(3)of the basic Regulation.
Three exporting producers/groups of exporting producers in China requested individual examination under Article 27(3)of the basic Regulation.
It raised doubts about the representativeness of the 23 cooperating Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers mentioned in recital 16 above in relation to the total quantity of PSF exported from China to the Union.
Two sampled exporting producers/groups of exporting producers submitted detailed information concerning this scheme, including the amount of benefit received.
With regard to the third claim,the Commission confirms the conclusion reached at the provisional stage that the number of requests for individual treatment(by three groups of exporting producers in the PRC, composed of several individual undertakings) was so large as to make individual examinations unduly burdensome and prevent the completion of the investigation in good time.
Two Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers requested that the sample should be selected on the basis of the raw material used for the production of PSF.
Four of the sampled Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers reported an exemption from VAT and import tariffs for the imported equipment.
The benefit to the exporting producers/groups of exporting producers has been calculated by taking the interest rate differential, expressed as a percentage, multiplied by the outstanding amount of the loan, i.e.
However, the size of these two Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers was not at such as to change the sample, had they submitted the requested information within the deadline.
On the basis of the information received from the exporting producers/groupsof exporting producers and in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation the Commission initially proposed a sample of the five cooperating exporting producers/groups of exporting producers with the largest volume of exports to the Union during the investigation period.
The imports of the 23 cooperating Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers represented 83% of the total Chinese import volume and cooperation was therefore considered high.
The Commission had selected the five largest exporting producers/groups of exporting producers in terms of volume, representing 53% of total export volumes to the Union by the cooperating Chinese exporters.
However, the investigation revealed that the Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers of PSF were importing most of their PTA and MEG inputs to produce PSF for export under an inward processing system.
As mentioned in recital 16 the Commission selected a sample of five exporting producers/groups of exporting producers that cooperated in the investigation with the largest volume of exports to the Union during the investigation period in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a representative sample of three groups of exporting producers/producers based on the largest declared volume of exports, both to the EU and third countries, and production of the product under review during the review investigation period.
As such, this group of exporting producers was considered as not cooperating in the investigation and its request for MET and IT was rejected.
The range of the total aggregated subsidies for the Chinese sampled exporting producers/group of exporting producers expressed ad valorem provided in recital 114 represents the lower and higher total subsidy margin of the five sampled Chinese exporting producers/group of exporting producers.
In addition, one group of exporting producers failed to declare their relationship with a major domestic customer both in the reply to the market economy claim form and the response to the anti-dumping questionnaire.
One of the Chinese exporting producers/group of exporting producers claimed that the sample should be based on export value rather than export volume and asked to be included in the sample.
The Commission confirms that it sought information and replies concerning all subsidy schemes alleged in the complaint including those mentioned by the complainant in its comments to the disclosure, butthese schemes were found not to be used by the sampled exporting producers/group of exporting producers.