Примери за използване на Impossible or excessively на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Those national time-limits shall not render virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of those rights.
According to this principle, national procedures may not make the exercise of rights conferred under EU law practically impossible or excessively complicated.
However, such time limits are not liable to render practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by EU law.(20).
Moreover the burden and the level of proof and of fact-pleading required for the quantification of harm may not render the exercise of the injured party s right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult.
However, those national time-limits shall not render virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of those rights.
The courts must ensure that neither the burden northe standard of proof required to quantify the harm makes the exercise of the right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult.
These procedures should not make it impossible or excessively difficult to exercise the rights conferred on consumers by European Union law(principle of effectiveness).
According to that principle, the realisation of the rights conferred by EU law may not be rendered practically impossible or excessively difficult' para.
If, however, due to the type of the non-compliance, the type of the Product or the Product's mounting method it is impossible or excessively difficult to deliver the product, the Client is obliged to make the Product available to the Seller in the place where the product is located upon an earlier date arrangement.
Member States shall ensure that the court fees charged in Member States for civil disputes are not disproportionate to the value of the claim anddo not render litigation impossible or excessively difficult.
Reasonable time-limits are not in themselves liable to make it virtually impossible or excessively difficult to exercise rights conferred by EU law(428).
It shall also be ensured that neither the burden, nor the standard of proof required for the quantification of harm,render the exercise of the right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult.
Such presumptions of guilt may not be formulated in such a way as to make it practically impossible or excessively difficult for the taxable person to rebut them with evidence to the contrary.".
Member States shall ensure that neither the burden northe standard of proof required for the quantification of harm renders the exercise of the right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult.
The principle of effectiveness means that domestic procedural law must not make it impossible or excessively difficult to enforce rights derived from EU law.
Member States shall ensure that the burden andthe standard of proof▐ required for the quantification of harm does not render the exercise of the▐ right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult.
Nevertheless, these measures shall be equivalent to those applicable to similar situations under domestic law andshall not make it impossible or excessively difficult in practice for claimants to exercise the rights conferred on them by this Regulation.
In the submissions to the Court in the present case, there has been no comparison with any timelimit applicableto similar domestic situations, nor has it been argued that a timelimit of two clear years renders in general- rather than in the specific circumstances- the exercise of the right to deduct virtually impossible or excessively difficult.
The principle of effectiveness requires that domestic judicial procedures must not be liable to render practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by EU law.
Member States shall lay down specific procedural rules concerning the modalities for filing and processing requests for the provision of free legal assistance and representation or they shall apply the existing rules for domestic claims of a similar nature,provided that those rules do not render access to free legal assistance and representation impossible or excessively difficult.
The principle of effectiveness states that the procedural requirements for domestic actions must not render it impossible or excessively difficult to enforce rights derived from EU law.
However, as underlined above in point 34, Article 47 of the Charter andthe principle of effectiveness preclude any EU law-based actions being‘prohibitively expensive' in the sense of making actions impossible or excessively difficult due to costs.
If, however, due to the type of the defect, type of the product or the way it is mounted, the delivery by Client is impossible or excessively difficult, the Client will be asked to provide, upon prior appointment, the place where the product is located.
Such suspension or interruption should not prevent Member States from maintaining or introducing absolute limitation periods, provided that the duration of such absolute limitation periods does notrender the effective enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU practically impossible or excessively difficult.
However such rules must not be less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions norrender virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law….
Those principles require, however, if the return of the VAT invoiced to the customer without being owed, is impossible or excessively difficult, in particular in the event of the supplier's insolvency, that the recipient of the services is entitled to submit a refund request directly to the tax authority.
However, these domestic requirements should not be less favourable than those governing similardomestic actions(principle of equivalence), nor should they render the exercise of the Union right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult(principle of effectiveness).
If, however, due to the type of defect, type of the Product or the method of its installation,the Product delivery by the Customer would be impossible or excessively difficult, the Customer will be asked to provide the Seller's Product at the place where the Product is located, after prior appointment.
However, the requirements of national law regarding the quantification of harm in competition law cases should not be less favourable than those governing similardomestic actions(principle of equivalence), nor should they render the exercise of the Union right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult(principle of effectiveness).
However, if for reasons of the type of defect, type of the Product or the method of its installation,delivery of the Product by the Customer would be impossible or excessively difficult, the Customer will be asked to provide, after prior appointment, the Service Provider's Product in the place where the Product is located.