Примери за използване на Impossible or disproportionate на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
However, this should not put an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
Nor must these obligations be interpreted in such a way as to impose an impossible or disproportionate burden.
The seller must carry out any repair or provide a replacement free of charge, within a reasonable time and without significant inconvenience to the consumer andmay refuse to do so only if that is impossible or disproportionate.
Nor must such an obligation be interpreted in such a way as to impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
The first and third subparagraphs of Article 3(3) of that directive state that, in the first place, the consumer may require the seller to repair the goods or he may require the seller to replace them, in either case free of charge,unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
Such an obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities”.
In this respect, it should be recalled that, pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 3(3) of the Directive, the consumer may in the first place require the seller to repair the goods or to replace them, in either case free of charge,unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
Moreover, any implied duty should not be interpreted in such a way as to place an impossible or disproportionate burden on a Contracting State.
(21c) Pursuant to Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, a consumer has the right, in the case of a lack of conformity of consumer goods with the contract, to require the seller to repair those goods or to replace them, in either case free of charge,unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
However, the positive obligations should not be interpreted in a way, which impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
Whereas the consumer in the first place may require the seller to repair the goods or to replace them unless those remedies are impossible or disproportionate;
However, the positive obligations should not be interpreted in a way,which impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
The consumer, at his option, ask the seller to repair the goods or to replace them, in either case free of charge,unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
The remedy to bring the digital content or digital service into conformity is impossible or disproportionate in accordance with paragraph 2;
Thus, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 3(3) of the Directive, the consumer may, in the first place, require the seller to repair the goods or to replace them, unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
However, the scope of the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
In the first place, the consumer may require the seller to repair the goods or he may require the seller to replace them, in either case free of charge,unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
However, the scope of the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
In that regard, the consumer is, as is clear from Article 3(3), first subparagraph, of the Directive, entitled to the performance-oriented remedies of repair or replacement,‘unless this is impossible or disproportionate'.
In case of a lack of conformity, you are entitled to have the products brought into conformity free of charge by repair or replacement or, if this is impossible or disproportionate, to an appropriate reduction in the price or a refund.
The Court noted that it bears in mind the difficulties in policing modern societies, the‘unpredictability of human conduct' and the operational choices that must be made in terms of priorities and resources,stating that the scope of the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way that does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
Subject to considerations as to the difficulties involved in policing modern societies, the unpredictability of human conduct and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources,such an obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities and which also conforms with the other rights guaranteed under the Convention.
The consumer may, in the first place, require the seller to repair the goods or to replace them, unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
The consumer can first request a free repair or free replacement of goods from the seller,unless this is impossible or disproportionate.
At the moment reduction of price or termination of contract can only be invoked if repair or replacement are impossible or disproportionate.
Bearing in mind the difficulties involved in policing modern societies and the choices which had to be made in terms of priorities and resources,positive obligations had to be interpreted in a way which did not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
Bearing in mind the difficulties involved in policing modern societies and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources, the obligation to take operational measures must, however,be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
Bearing in mind the difficulties in policing modern societies, the unpredictability of human conduct and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources,the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
In the light of the difficulties in policing modern societies, the unpredictability of human conduct and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources,the scope of the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.
Bearing in mind the difficulties in policing modern societies, the unpredictability of human conduct and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources,the scope of the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities.