Примери за използване на Inadmissible and in part на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Accordingly, the second ground of appeal must be rejected as in part inadmissible and in part unfounded.
Case T-60/08 P Kerelov v Commission Appeal- Civil service- Recruitment- Notice of competition- Non‑inclusion on the reserve list- Exclusion from competition for infringement of the rule prohibiting candidates from making direct orindirect contact with the selection board- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
By order of 22 May 2019, the Court of Justice(Eighth Chamber)dismissed the appeal as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfoundedand ordered Cuervo y Sobrinos 1882, S.L.
Case T‑286/11 P Marcuccio v Commission Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Non-contractual liability- Compensation for the damage resulting from the fact that a letter concerning costs in a case was sent to the lawyer who represented the appellant in that case- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Action for damages- State aid- Limitation- Damage for which compensation may be awarded- Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law- Manifest lack of jurisdiction.
Appeal- Civil service-Officials- Invalidity pensions and allowances- Retirement on the grounds of invalidity- Implied refusal by the Commission to adopt a decision concerning recognition of the occupational origin of the disease- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Contract staff- Dismissal- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case T‑256/10 P Marcuccio v Commission Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Removal of personal effects- Implied and express rejection of the appellant's request- Duty to state reasons- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
By order of 3 October 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union(Tenth Chamber)dismissed the appeal as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfoundedand ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Staff Committee of the Commission- Revocation by the Luxembourg local section of one of its members appointed to the central staff committee- Decision refusing to recognise the lawfulness of the revocation decision- Action at first instance dismissed as manifestly inadmissible- Non respect of the pre-litigation procedure- Act adversely affecting a person- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
The Council and the Commission contend that the third ground of appeal is, in part, inadmissible and, in part, unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Reports procedure- Career development report- Appraisal for the years 2001/2002, 2004,2005 and 2008- Delay in drawing up career development reports- Non-material damage- Loss of opportunity for promotion- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Disciplinary proceedings- Disciplinary measure- Downgrading- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Social security- Article 73 of the Staff Regulations- Rules on insurance against the risks of accident and of occupational disease- Principle of collegiality- Legal nature ofthe dispute- Physical or mental disability rating- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Reports- Staff report- Reporting exercise for 2005- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Order of referral- Decision which cannot be the subject of an appeal- Action for damages- Pre-litigation procedure- Procedural defects- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
It follows that the second part of the single ground of appeal relied on by Bimbo must be rejected as being in part inadmissible and in part unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Pensions- Decision concerning the calculation of pension rights- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Invalidity allowance- Payment of arrears- Default interest- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Recruitment- Dismissal at the end of the probationary period- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation- Lateness- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Promotion- 2005 promotion year- Award of priority points- Burden of proof- Rights of the defence- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Refusal by an institution to open an inquiry- Pre-litigation procedure- Action for damages- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Recruitment- Open competition- Refusal by the Director of EPSO to communicate to a candidate information and documents relating to the admission test- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded Language of the case: French.
Order of the Court of First Instance(Second Chamber) of 29 August 2007- SELEXSistemi Integrati v Commission, Case T-186/05(Action for damages- Noncontractual liability- Competition- Decision of the Commission rejecting a complaint under Article 82 EC- Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly without foundation in law- Actual loss).
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Promotion- 2008 promotion procedure- Decision awarding points in the promotion procedure- Mention of points accumulated in previous promotion procedures- Distortion of the facts- Burden of costs- Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded Language of the case: German.
Case T‑261/00 Sacaim and Others v Commission Action for annulment- State aid- Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia- Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid- Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Action for annulment- Access to documents- Regulation(EC) No 1049/2001- Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the‘Partnership for Peace' programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights- Partial refusal of access- Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security- Duty to state reasons- Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
The Commission contends that the second ground of appeal is in part inadmissible and, in any event, unfounded.
Appeal- Civil service- Officials- Remuneration- Refusal to grant the appellants an allowance for shift work- Time-limit for lodging a complaint- Out of time- Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible.