Примери за използване на Mah's proposal на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The CHMP agreed with the MAH's proposal.
The MAH's proposal was amended and considered to be acceptable by the CHMP.
The CHMP was in agreement with the MAH's proposal.
The CHMP noted the MAH's proposal for section 4.2.
The MAH's proposal was supported by the CHMP as it was consistent with the wording in the majority of the countries.
The CHMP endorsed most of the MAH's proposal except for pregnancy.
Therefore the MAH's proposal to add Stage II and Stage III nomenclature to this indication was considered to be acceptable by the CHMP.
Regarding section 5.3 Preclinical safety data, the MAH's proposal was amended and considered to be acceptable by the CHMP.
The MAH's proposal‘Infections in patients with impaired defence mechanisms' was not considered to be sufficiently supported by data.
Given the accumulation of data since the implementation of the additional risk minimisation measures,the PRAC agreed with the MAH's proposal to remove the additional risk minimisation measures.
The CHMP noted the MAH's proposal for section 4.4 and agreed with the majority of the content.
Section 4.4- Special warnings and precautions for use As it is well-known that 5-HT3 antagonists lower bowel motility, which is reflected in the literature,the CHMP endorsed the MAH's proposal that patients with signs of sub-acute intestinal obstruction should be monitored following administration of Kytril.
The CHMP endorsed the MAH's proposal not to include the insertion of viral resistance in the Section 4.3.
The statement that isolated cases of myopathy have been reported post-marketing for concomitant administration of fluvastatin with ciclosporin and the statement related to concomitant administration of fluvastatin andcolchicines has been included in the MAH's proposal and agreed by the CHMP.
The CHMP found the MAH's proposal appropriate and acceptable and endorsed the harmonised wording under this section.
As recorded in the minutes of the prereferral meeting held on 27 July 2011, regarding the approach to label harmonisation,the Agency agreed with the MAH's proposal to use the SmPC wording that is common in the majority of the Members States, the Sandimmun and Sandimmun Neoral CDSs as justified by the review of legacy studies and literature references.
Therefore the MAH's proposal to give a common broad indication wording, not explicitly differentiating between cancer and non-cancer pain, was endorsed by the CHMP.
As a result the CHMP endorsed the MAH's proposal for this indication with the addition of the related population(i.e. adults only).
The MAH's proposal including the fatal cases reported with overdosage was accepted with the addition of the types of toxicities observed and general recommended actions.
However, the CHMP endorsed the MAH's proposal to commit to specifically monitor and report malignancies within future PSURs.
The MAH's proposal not to include hypothetical symptoms listed in a minority of SmPC, but to remain consistent with wording provided in the CDS was accepted by the CHMP.
Therefore the CHMP was in agreement with the MAH's proposal that teicoplanin should be used in combination with other anti-microbial agents when appropriate, as cross-referenced in section 4.4.
The MAH's proposal included results of a single study for the paediatric population but the CHMP stated that the information for the paediatric population should not consist of a single study data.
The CHMP also agreed with the MAH's proposal not to include a recommendation to assess causes of secondary hypercholesterolaemia in the indications section.
The MAH's proposal to include response to diet and other measures(e.g. exercise, weight reduction) was also considered to be acceptable as it is in line with other statin product information texts.
The CHMP considered the MAH's proposal for risk minimisation measures: the inclusion of information related to fibrosis and ergotism in section 4.4 of the Summary of Product Characteristics.
The MAH's proposal regarding hypercholesterolaemia indications were mostly supported except for the proposal to include the wording that:‘Lipitor also raises HDL-cholesterol and lowers the LDL/HDL and total cholesterol/HDL ratios'.
Based on the assessment of the MAH's proposal, the responses to the LoQ, LoOI and following the discussions of the committee, the CHMP agreed upon a harmonised wording of the section 4.2 accordingly for the special populations.
Whilst reviewing the MAH's proposal, in view of the SmPC guideline, the CHMP considered that the category“not known” should only be used in exceptional cases; the MAH was requested to adhere to the classification according to the CSP unless adequately justified.
The CHMP acknowledged the MAH's proposal to delete this indication as, in the absence of any data to support the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders, a positive benefit-risk balance of Symbioflor 2 could not be established;