Примери за използване на Neutral arbitrator на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
By assigning neutral arbitrator instead of a judge or jury….
Free people are striving after a system that guarantees that conflicts will be resolved only in a peaceful way, through negotiations,or with the assistance of a neutral arbitrator- a judge.
Arbitration uses a neutral arbitrator instead of a judge or jury.
Companies frequently include international arbitration agreements in their commercial contracts with businesses located in other States, so thatif a dispute arises they are obligated to arbitrate before neutral arbitrators rather than to pursue litigation before a foreign court.
Arbitration uses a neutral arbitrator instead of a judge or jury and is subject to very limited review by courts.
If either party gives written notice requesting an appeal within 10 business days after the issuance of the Statement of Decision,the award of the Arbitrator shall be appealed to three neutral arbitrators(the“Appellate Arbitrators”), each of whom shall have the same qualifications and be selected through the same procedure as the Arbitrator. .
Arbitration uses a neutral arbitrator instead of a judge or jury, and court review of an arbitration award is very limited.
Instead, all disputes will be resolved before a neutral arbitrator, whose decision will be final except for a limited right of appeal under the US Federal Arbitration Act.
It uses a neutral arbitrator instead of a judge or jury, allows for more limited discovery than in court, and is subject to very limited review by courts.
Instead, all disputes will be resolved before a neutral arbitrator, whose decision will be final except for a right of appeal under the Federal Arbitration Act.
It uses a neutral arbitrator instead of a judge or jury and the arbitrator's decision is subject to limited review by courts.
The dispute shall be settled by binding arbitration before a neutral arbitrator whose decision will be final except for a limited right of appeal under the U.S. Federal Arbitration Act.
Arbitration uses a neutral arbitrator rather than a judge or jury, allows for more limited discovery, and is subject to very narrow review by courts.
Arbitration utilizes a neutral arbitrator rather than a judge or jury, and court review of an arbitration award is very limited.
They say they hope a neutral arbitrator will now help them find a solution acceptable to both parties and plan a press statement on the progress on Thursday.
Your rights will be determined by a neutral arbitrator, not a judge or jury, and the arbitrator shall determine all issues regarding the arbitrability of the dispute.
Your rights will be determined by neutral arbitrator, and not by a judge or jury, and the arbitrator shall determine all issues regarding the arbitrability of the Claims.
World Intellectual Property Organization offers highly qualified and neutral arbitrator participants that based on thorough research and expeditious administrative procedures decide on the dispute over intellectual property rights over the domain, which is characterized by impartiality and reliability.
Alternative dispute resolution(ADR)relies on a neutral party(such as an arbitrator, mediator or an ombudsman).
They involve a neutral party(e.g. a conciliator, mediator, arbitrator, ombudsman, complaints board etc.) who proposes or imposes a solution or brings the parties together to help them find a solution.
The ODR entity is a neutral party(i.e. a conciliator, mediator, arbitrator, ombudsman, or complaint handling body), and with its assistance TISZA CIPŐ will resolve disputes when a consumer requests ODR dispute resolution.
An ADR entity is a neutral party(e.g. a conciliator, mediator, arbitrator, ombudsman or a complaints board) which H&M will make use of to settle disputes, if the consumer decides for an ADR settlement.
Neutral Evaluation is a process by which a neutral hears submissions from the parties on the merits of a case and offers a non-binding evaluation of the likely outcome in the event the matter proceeds to adjudication by a judge or an arbitrator.
We choose… one of the arbitrators, you choose the other, the third is neutral.
Alternative dispute resolution procedures are provided by neutral out-of-court bodies such as conciliators, mediators, arbitrators, the ombudsman and complaints boards.
The latter is considered flexible and neutral, as the parties choose themselves independent and highly qualified arbitrators to resolve their dispute, while if the State is sued in the national court by a foreign investor, there might be bias and difficulties in the enforcement.
There is no institution involved in the process, but there is still a need(and a recommendation)for the parties to designate a third, neutral party(known as an“appointing authority”) to have the final word on the selection of arbitrators if the parties fail to agree, as is often the case.
Unlike the litigation process or arbitration, where a neutral third party(judge or arbitrator) imposes a decision over the matter, the parties and their mediator ordinarily control the mediation process- deciding when and where the mediation takes place, who will be present, how the mediation will be paid for, and how the mediator will interact with the parties.
As major international construction projects often involve parties from different jurisdictions, with different cultural approaches and coming from different legal systems, parties also often see arbitration as the preferred dispute resolution method,as a three-membered tribunal composed of arbitrators with different background and from various legal systems will appear more neutral and independent that national judges before local courts.