Примери за използване на Patent proprietor на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The costs of such translations shall be borne by the patent proprietor.
In this case, the patent proprietor may be required to provide further translations at his or her own expense.
Such translations would be provided at the expense of the patent proprietor.
(19) Patent proprietors should pay a single annual renewal fee for a European patent with unitary effect.
The cost of the translation referred to in paragraphs 1 and2 shall be borne by the patent proprietor.
Хората също превеждат
(16) Patent proprietors should pay one common annual renewal fee for European patents with unitary effect.
A European patent granted by the EPO should, at the request of the patent proprietor, benefit from unitary effect by virtue of this.
(16) Patent proprietors should pay one common annual renewal fee for European patents with unitary effect.
The approach mandated by the Protocol was one"between these extremes" which combines a fair protection for the patent proprietor with a reasonable degree of legal certainty for third parties.".
The patent proprietor would also need to provide a full translation of the EU patent into the language of proceedings at the request of a court.
On the contrary, it is to be interpreted as defining a position between these extremes which combines a fair protection for the patent proprietor with a reasonable degree of legal certainty for third parties.'.
The patent proprietor is also required to provide a full translation of the EU patent into the language of proceedings of the competent court in the European Union at the request of that court.
No further translations into other languages will be required from the patent proprietor except in the case of a legal dispute concerning the EU patent. .
(2) If the applicant or patent proprietor has been notified of the grounds prejudicing the grant or maintenance of the patent, he may be invited to submit, by the date specified in paragraph 1, second sentence, documents which meet the requirements of the Convention.
The use by a farmer of protected livestock for an agricultural purpose, provided that the breeding stock orother animal reproductive material were sold or otherwise commercialised to the farmer by or with the consent of the patent proprietor.
In the case of a dispute relating to an EU patent, the patent proprietor shall provide at the request of the competent court in the European Union in the course of legal proceedings, a full translation of the patent into the language of the proceedings of the court.
(25) Establishing a Unified Patent Court to hear cases concerning the[EPUE] is essential in order to ensure the proper functioning of that patent, consistency of case-law andhence legal certainty, and cost-effectiveness for patent proprietors.
In practice, this can lead to difficulties when a patent proprietor wishes to enforce a European patent in several countries or when a third party seeks the revocation of a European patent. .
Using a process which is the subject matter of the patent or, where the third party knows, or should have known,that the use of the process is prohibited without the consent of the patent proprietor, offering the process for use within the territory of the Contracting Member States in which that patent has effect;
This Article requires that in the case of a legal dispute the patent proprietor provides at the request and the choice of the alleged infringer a full translation of the EU patent into an official language of the Member State in which either the alleged infringement took place or in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
(i) the use by a farmer of protected livestock for farming purposes, on condition that the breeding animals orother animal reproductive material were sold or otherwise commercialised to the farmer by the patent proprietor or with his/her consent.
(4) In case of a dispute concerning an EU patent, it is a legitimate requirement that the patent proprietor provides a full translation of the EU patent into an official language of the Member State in which either the alleged infringement took place or in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
Therefore, rights conferred by a European patent with unitary effect should not extend to acts concerning the product covered by that patent which are carried out within the participating Member States after that product has been placed on the market in the Union by the patent proprietor.
Nearly all stakeholders rejected this solution as being unsatisfactory due to the high costs andpractical difficulties for patent proprietors as well as the legal uncertainty for all users of the patent system resulting from the legal effect which would have been given to translations.
In infringement proceedings the patent proprietor must provide at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the specification into an official language of the country in which the alleged infringement took place or the alleged infringer's domicile.
(13) In order to promote andfacilitate the economic exploitation of inventions protected by European patents with unitary effect, the patent proprietor should be able to offer its patent to be licensed to anyone complying with the terms and conditions set out by the patent proprietor in return for appropriate compensation.
In addition, the patent proprietor can prevent third parties from using a process which is the subject matter of the patent or, when a third party knows or should have known that the use of the process is prohibited without the consent of the proprietor, from offering the process for use within the participating Member States.
In the case of a dispute relating to a European patent with unitary effect, the patent proprietor shall provide at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the patent into an official language of the participating Member State in which either the alleged infringement took place or in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
In the event of a dispute relating to an alleged infringement of a unitary patent, the patent proprietor shall provide, at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the unitary patent into an official language of either the participating Member State in which the alleged infringement took place or in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
In practice, this gives rise to a number of difficulties when a patent proprietor wishes to enforce a European patent- or when a third party seeks the revocation of a European patent- in several countries: high costs, risk of diverging decisions and lack of legal certainty.