Примери за използване на Percent predicted на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Absolute change in percent predicted(mmol/L).
Percent predicted FEV1 was also evaluated as a clinically meaningful other secondary endpoint.
Absolute change in percent predicted FEV1(percentage points).
The primary endpoint was the change from Baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted FVC.
Absolute change from baseline in percent predicted FEV1(percentage points) N.
Patients had a percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second(ppFEV1) at screening between 40 to 90%.
Absolute change from baseline in percent predicted FEV1 at each visit†.
Only 23 percent predicted that employment will rise over the next six months, down from 39 percent who expected more hiring in April.
Effect of ivacaftor on percent predicted FEV1 in study 4.
FEV1 Percent predicted relative change from baseline to Day 28 in placebo-controlled efficacy and safety studies of Quinsair in patients with CF.
Table 5 shows the results of the mean(SD)absolute change in percent predicted FEV1 for both groups of patients.
Two percent of patients had percent predicted FVC below 50% and 21% of patients had a percent predicted DLCO below 35% at Baseline.
Table 4 Categorical assessment of change from Baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted FVC in study PIPF-016.
Effect of ivacaftor on percent predicted FEV1 in study 4 Original study and treatment group.
The primary efficacy endpoint in both studies was the mean absolute change from baseline in percent predicted FEV1 through 24 weeks of treatment.
The mean(SD) overall change in percent predicted FEV1 from baseline at Week 24(exploratory endpoint) was 1.8(17.81).
In a subgroup analysis in patients with a confirmed R117H-5T genetic variant, the difference in the mean absolute change from baseline through Week 24 in percent predicted FEV1 between ivacaftor and placebo was 5.3%95% CI 1.3.
Cycles 1 to 6,the LS Mean change in FEV1 percent predicted ranged between 3.6% to 4.6% except in Cycle 6, where it was close to baseline(-0.15%).
This shows that patients in the ivacaftor/ivacaftor group maintained the improvement seen at week 48 of the initial study(day 0 through week 48) in percent predicted FEV1 through week 144.
During the Extension Phase, the LS Mean change for FEV1 percent predicted ranged between 4.83% to 1.46% across the 3 additional treatment cycles.
Among patients who were originally randomised to weekly idursulfase in TKT024,mean maximum improvement in distance walked during six minutes occurred at Month 20 and mean percent predicted FVC peaked at Month 16.
Serious respiratory events were seen more frequently in patients with percent predicted FEV1(ppFEV1)< 40, and may lead to discontinuation of the medicinal product.
Based on clinical(percent predicted FEV1) and pharmacodynamic(sweat chloride) responses to ivacaftor, efficacy in patients with the G970R mutation could not be established.
Trial 1 evaluated 549 patients with CF who were aged 12 years andolder(mean age 25.1 years) with percent predicted FEV1(ppFEV1) at screening between 40-90mean ppFEV1 60.7 at baselinerange.
PpFEV1: percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second; SD: Standard Deviation; LS mean: least squares mean; CI: confidence interval; NA: not applicable; IVA: ivacaftor; CFQ-R: Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised.
Treatment with ivacaftor resulted in a mean absolute change in percent predicted FEV1 through Week 24 of 4.5 percentage points in the ivacaftor group versus -0.46 percentage points.
The effect of ivacaftor in the overall population of study 5(including the secondary endpoints absolute change in BMI at 8 weeks of treatment and absolute change in the respiratory domain score of the CFQ-R through 8 weeks of treatment) andby individual mutation(absolute change in sweat chloride and in percent predicted FEV1 at Week 8) is shown in Table 4.
In part 1 of study 5, the mean FEV1 percent predicted at baseline in placebo-treated patients was 79.3% while in ivacaftor-treated patients this value was 76.4%.
In a study of children and adolescents 9 to 17 years of age with moderate to severe asthma(trivalent Fluenz: n=24, placebo: n=24), the primary safety criterion,change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV1) measured before and after vaccination, did not differ between treatment arms.
When the mean(SD) absolute change in percent predicted FEV1 is compared from study 4 baseline for patients in the ivacaftor/ivacaftor group(n= 72) who rolled over from study 1, the mean(SD)absolute change in percent predicted FEV1 was 0.0%(9.05), while for patients in the ivacaftor/ivacaftor group(n= 25) who rolled over from study 2 this figure was 0.6%(9.1).