Примери за използване на Relocation mechanism на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Member States' Support to Emergency Relocation Mechanism.
An automatic refugee relocation mechanism will become an open invitation to migrants to come to Europe without restrictions.
EU will consider options for an"emergency relocation mechanism" for migrants.".
The temporary relocation mechanism provided for in the contested decision is not capable of redressing such structural defects.
The amendment to the Dublin Regulation to introduce a crisis relocation mechanism.
A permanent and automatic relocation mechanism, without thresholds.
In the long-term, however, the EU needs to set in place a clear and fair disembarkation and relocation mechanism.
The conditions for triggering the relocation mechanism are laid down in the proposal for a regulation.
The relocation mechanism was not a measure that was manifestly inappropriate for contributing to achieving its objective, namely helping Greece and Italy to cope with the impact of the 2015 migration crisis.
With 27,695 persons relocated so far,the EU relocation mechanism is working and delivering results.[…].
The Court decreed that the relocation mechanism was not a measure that was inappropriate to achieving its objective, namely helping Greece and Italy to cope with the impact of the 2015 migration crisis.
The Malta deal, signed in Valletta last month, envisages a temporary voluntary relocation mechanism for asylum seekers rescued at sea.
He gave strong support to the refugee relocation mechanism, but underlined that there should be clear discernment between those, who flee to save their lives and those looking for a better economic perspective.
If the argument put forward by the Slovak Republic and Hungary were to be followed, no relocation mechanism could be put in place on the basis of Article 78(3) TFEU.
Any proposal for a permanent emergency relocation mechanism must be based on a more substantial contribution to solidarity and responsibility-sharing among Member States, including a significant increase in the number of available relocation places.
Hungary explains its refusal to be included among the Member States benefiting from the temporary relocation mechanism put in place by the contested decision as follows.
The adoption of emergency measures on the basis of Article 78(3) TFEU will remain relevant in exceptional situations where an emergency response, possibly encompassing a wider migratory support, is needed,should the conditions for using the crisis relocation mechanism not be met'.
The particular feature of the contested decision is that it establishes a relocation mechanism on the basis of allocations assigned to the Member States which are binding in nature.
Their complementary nature is illustrated by the Proposal of 9 September 2015 for a Regulation of the European Parliament andof the Council establishing a crisis relocation mechanism and amending the Dublin III Regulation.
The Visegrad Four has turned into the biggest adversary of the refugee relocation mechanism, but many other states are not following on the commitments they made last autumn.
It also informed the Council that this approval is without prejudice to the position it will subsequently take on the proposal establishing a permanent crisis relocation mechanism, on which Parliament will decide together with the member states.
The relocation decision provides for the possibility to adapt the relocation mechanism in cases where Member States are confronted with sharp shifts in migrations flows resulting in sudden inflow of nationals of third countries.
It thus states that, contrary to the situation in that proposal, the contested decision provides, in Article 4(3),that other Member States may benefit from the relocation mechanism if they satisfy the conditions set out in that provision.
As the Commission explains,‘the proposal establishing a crisis relocation mechanism has to be distinguished from the proposals adopted by the Commission on the basis of Article 78(3) TFEU for the benefit of certain Member States confronted with a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries on their territories'.
The flows of migrants and refugees ha[d]more than doubled over the summer months giving impetus to trigger a new emergency relocation mechanism to alleviate pressure faced by[the Italian Republic],[the Hellenic Republic] and also Hungary'.
If by 26 September 2016,the Commission considers that an adaptation of the relocation mechanism is justified by the evolution of the situation on the ground or that a Member State is confronted with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries due to a sharp shift of migration flows and taking into account the views of the likely beneficiary Member State, it may submit, as appropriate, proposals to the Council, as referred to in Article 1(2).
The Commission should submit, as appropriate, proposals to amend this Decision in order toaddress the evolution of the situation on the ground and its impact upon the relocation mechanism, as well as the evolving pressure on Member States, in particular frontline Member States.
Recommendation 1 Đ Use lessons learned to build on experience for any possible voluntary relocation mechanism in the future The Commission should use the lessons learned from the emergency relocation schemes(including from the situation in the receiving Member State after relocation) and build on this experience for any possible voluntary relocation mechanism in the future.
The Commission should submit, as appropriate, proposals to amend this Decision in order toaddress the evolution of the situation on the ground and its impact upon the relocation mechanism, as well as the evolving pressure on Member States, in particular frontline Member States.
Having regard to the Commission proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a crisis relocation mechanism and amending Regulation(EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third country national or a stateless person(COM(2015)0450).