Примери за използване на Relocation procedure на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
(g b) issues related to the handling of relocation procedures;
Applicants that elude the relocation procedure shall be excluded from relocation. .
The Council Decisions require Member States to pledge available places for relocation every three months to ensure a swift and orderly relocation procedure.
In such case, the time limit for completing the relocation procedure may be extended for a period not exceeding a further 2 weeks.
The Council Decisions require Member States to pledge available places for relocation every three months to ensure a swift and orderly relocation procedure.
Accordingly, identification, registration and fingerprinting for the relocation procedure shall be guaranteed by Italy and by Greece.
For the implementation of all aspects of the relocation procedure described in this Article, Member States may, after exchanging all relevant information, decide to appoint liaison officers to Italy and to Greece.
National security andpublic order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented.
The Council Decisions require Member States to pledge available places for relocation every three months to ensure a swift and orderly relocation procedure.
Accordingly, identification, registration and fingerprinting for the relocation procedure shall be guaranteed by Italy and by Greece and the necessary facilities shall be put in place.
The Council Decisions require Member States to pledge available places for relocation every three months to ensure a swift and orderly relocation procedure.
The core elements of this Decision,in particular those relating to the relocation procedure and the rights and obligations of applicants, shall be duly taken into account in those arrangements.
The Council Decisions require Member States to pledge available places for relocation every three months to ensure a swift and orderly relocation procedure.
For the implementation of all aspects of the relocation procedure described in this Article, Member States may, after exchanging all relevant information, decide to appoint liaison officers to Italy and to Greece.
I observe, in that regard, that recital 32 of that decision states that‘national security andpublic order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented.
The relocation procedure provided for in this Article shall be completed as swiftly as possible and no later than 2 months from the time of the indication given by the Member State of relocation referred to in paragraph 2.
Prior to the decision to relocate an applicant, Italy and Greece shall inform the applicant in a language which the applicant understands oris reasonably supposed to understand of the relocation procedure as set out in this Decision.
Such arrangements should also reflect the core elements of this Decision,in particular those relating to the relocation procedure and the rights and obligations of applicants as well as those relating to Regulation(EU) No 604/2013.
It is necessary to ensure that a swift relocation procedure is put in place and to accompany the implementation of the provisional measures by close administrative cooperation between Member States and operational support provided by EASO.
(42) Furthermore, the choice of a period of application of 24 months is also justified in the light of the foreseeable period necessary to prepare for the implementation of the relocation procedure in all Member States, a fortiori if, as the Hellenic Republic correctly emphasised at the hearing, the unprecedented nature of that procedure is taken into account.
Likewise, the description of the relocation procedure set out in Article 5 of the contested decision demonstrates the desire of the institutions of the Union to take into account the requirement to safeguard the national security and public order of the Member States.
Italy should register as a matter of urgency all Eritreans present in Italy,centralise the relocation procedure to dedicated relocation hubs, and standardise the procedure to enable relocation of unaccompanied minors.
Where the relocation procedure is not completed within these time limits and unless Italy and Greece agree with the Member State of relocation to a reasonable extension of the time limit, Italy and Greece shall remain responsible for examining the application for international protection pursuant to Regulation(EU) No 604/2013.
In addition to the support provided under paragraph 1, andfor the purpose of facilitating the implementation of all steps of the relocation procedure, specific support shall be provided as appropriate to Italy and to Greece through relevant activities coordinated by EASO, Frontex and other relevant Agencies.
The relocation procedure provided for in this Article shall be completed as swiftly as possible and not later than 2 months from the time of the indication given by the Member State of relocation as referred to in paragraph 2, unless the approval by the Member State of relocation referred to in paragraph 4 takes place less than 2 weeks before the expiry of that 2-month period.
In its most recent 10th Report on Relocation and Resettlement of 2nd March 2017, the Commission explained that there are several reasons, apart from the lack of pledges of Member States(e.g. lack of dedicated procedure for the relocation of unaccompanied minors or specific requirements of some Member States as regards security interviews),contributing to the fact that the implementation of the emergency relocation procedure in Italy remains behind expectations.
In addition, applicants should be informed of the relocation procedure set out in this Decision and be notified with the relocation decision which constitutes a transfer decision within the meaning of Article 26 of[the Dublin III] Regulation.
Stresses the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes, relocation procedures and return operations, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund(AMIF), in order to achieve an effective European asylum and migration policy while preventing and reducing irregular migration;
In line with the Union acquis,a robust mechanism of identification, registration and fingerprinting for the relocation procedure should be ensured by Italy and Greece so as to quickly identify the persons in need of international protection who are eligible for relocation and to identify the migrants who do not qualify for international protection and should therefore be returned.
It is required, the owners of the two accounts to agree to the procedure(relocation).