Examples of using Relocation procedure in English and their translations into Croatian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The scope of the relocation procedure set out in this Decision is limited in two respects.
Bilateral meetings took place with Member States with large monthly pledges to plan the different phases of the relocation procedure.
Applicants that elude the relocation procedure shall be excluded from relocation. .
Among the first measures under the European agenda on migration, the Commission presented a proposal for a provisional relocation procedure to support Italy and Greece.
Therefore, the relocation procedure must still be carried out by the Member States for eligible applicants within a reasonable timeframe thereafter.
In such case, the time limit for completing the relocation procedure may be extended by no more than two weeks.
The Council Decisions require Member States to pledge available places for relocation every three months to ensure a swift and orderly relocation procedure.
National security and public order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented.
The proposal sets out a simple relocation procedure, to ensure a quick transfer of the persons concerned to the Member State of relocation. .
(32) National security and public order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented.
It is necessary to ensure that a swift relocation procedure is put in place and to accompany the implementation of the relocation procedure by a close administrative cooperation between Member States and operational support provided by EASO.
For the effective implementation of this planning,all Member States should show constructive spirit at each step of the relocation procedure and the Commission stands ready to facilitate this process.
For the implementation of all aspects of the relocation procedure described in this Article Member States may decide to send to Italy and Greece liaison officers.
I observe, in that regard, that recital 32 of that decision states that‘national security andpublic order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented.
In addition, applicants should be informed of the relocation procedure set out in this Decision and notified with the relocation decision.
The relocation procedure should be completed as swiftly as possible, and not later than two months after the relocating Member State has officially indicated the number of applicants who can be relocated to its territory.
Finally, the proposal also specifies that for the purpose of the relocation procedure, Member States may decide to send to Italy and Greece liaison officers.
In addition, there must be a right to an effective remedy under national law, in accordance with Article 47 of the Charter,against any decision to be taken by a national authority in the course of the relocation procedure laid down in Article 5 of the contested decision.
Identification, registration and fingerprinting for the relocation procedure shall be guaranteed by the Member State benefiting from relocation and the necessary facilities shall be in place.
Proper border management requires that all new arrivals are effectively registered andchannelled either into national asylum procedures, relocation procedures or return procedures, in line with Dublin EU rules.
For the implementation of all aspects of the relocation procedure described in this Article, Member States may decide to appoint in the Member State benefiting from relocation liaison officers after exchanging all relevant information.
In order to meet the commitments allocated so far under the relocation scheme, around 5,600 relocations per month should be achieved as a minimum,implying a relocation procedure of a maximum period of two weeks see Annex.
With that in mind, Article 5 of the contested decision,which is entitled‘Relocation procedure', provides, in paragraph 7, that Member States retain the right to refuse to relocate an applicant only where there are reasonable grounds for regarding him or her as a danger to their national security or public order.
As regards both the appointment of liaison officers in the Member State benefiting from relocation and the fulfilment of their tasks, the Member State of relocation and the Member State benefiting from relocation should exchange all relevant information andcontinue cooperating closely throughout the relocation procedure.
The aim is to assist Italy and Greece in particular in the screening andthe initial stages of the processing of applications as well as in the implementation of the relocation procedure set out in this proposal in particular provision of information and specific assistance to the persons concerned and practical arrangements for implementing the transfers.
The proposal specifies the right to receive information on the relocation procedure, the right to be notified with the relocation decision which must specify the precise Member State of relocation and the right to be relocated with the family members in the same Member State of relocation. .
The appointment by Member States of liaison officers in the Member State benefiting from relocation should facilitate the effective implementation of the relocation procedure, including the appropriate identification of the applicants who could be relocated, taking into account in particular their vulnerability and qualifications.
(42) Furthermore, the choice of a period of application of 24 months is also justified in the light of the foreseeable period necessary to prepare for the implementation of the relocation procedure in all Member States, a fortiori if, as the Hellenic Republic correctly emphasised at the hearing, the unprecedented nature of that procedure is taken into account.
It must be noted in this regard that recital 32 of the contested decision states, inter alia, that national security andpublic order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented and that, in that context, the applicant's fundamental rights, including the relevant rules on data protection, must be fully respected.
The two countries should also improve their coordination capacity, enhance their reception capacity, avoid the risks of candidates absconding andadequately tailor and improve the procedures for relocation of unaccompanied minors.