Примери за използване на Relocation scheme на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Which countries participate in the emergency relocation scheme?
The emergency relocation schemes did not reach their targets.
The European Court of Justice has recently confirmed that our relocation schemes are valid.
Emergency relocation schemes did not reach their targets and only partially achieved their main objective of alleviating pressure on Greece and Italy.
These include the setting-up of ŇhotspotsÓ andintroduction of temporary relocation schemes.
We also assessed whether the temporary emergency relocation schemes had achieved their targets and objectives.
For this purpose,the Commission recently provided €15.33 million in emergency assistance to improve the functioning of the relocation scheme in Italy.
Parliament objects that the intra-EU relocation scheme should not be mixed up with the resettlement one, which involves a non-EU country.
The Commission is reporting today on the implementation of the temporary emergency relocation schemes and the European resettlement scheme. .
However, the temporary emergency relocation schemes did not reach their targets and so did not effectively alleviate the pressure on the Greek and Italian asylum systems.
Associated States have no obligation to take part in the emergency relocation scheme but may decide voluntarily to participate.
The replies received were again found not satisfactory andthe three Member States have given no indication that they will contribute to the implementation of the emergency relocation scheme.
Civil Liberties Committee MEPs object that the intra-EU relocation scheme should not be mixed up with the resettlement one, which involves a non-EU country.
In the final conclusions of the summit leaders are asked to fulfil the commitments made at previous summits,including the relocation scheme, on which implementation is negligible.
Whereas Hungary has not taken any action at all since the relocation scheme started, Poland has not relocated anyone and not pledged since December 2015.
This is also aprecondition for correctly channelling migrants towards the national asylum procedure, the Emergency relocation scheme or the return procedure.
Despite the confirmation by the Court of Justice of the EU of the validity of the relocation scheme in its ruling from the 6 September, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland remain in breach of their legal obligations.
This provision, which is being activatedfor the first time, will be used to set up an emergency relocation scheme to assist Italy and Greece.
Despite the confirmation by the Court of Justice of the EU of the validity of the relocation scheme in its ruling from the 6 September, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland remain in breach of their legal obligations.
To answer this sub-question,we assessed whether our recommendations in special report 06/2017 had been implemented and whether the temporary emergency relocation schemes had achieved their objectives.
Member States and Associated Countries which were already participating actively in the relocation scheme reacted positively to the Commission's call and communicated their planned monthly pledges.
The temporary emergency relocation scheme was established in two Council Decisions in September 2015, in which Member States committed to relocate persons in need of global protection from Italy and Greece.
(6b) Many applicants in need of international protection currently present in Greece and Italy cannot benefit from the relocation scheme as they fall under Regulation(EU) No 604/2013.
The temporary emergency relocation scheme was established in two Council Decisions in September 2015 in which Member States committed to relocate 160,000 people from Italy and Greece(and if relevant from other Member States) by September 2017.
The report also discusses the implementation of the Dublin Regulation and the emergency relocation scheme, two instruments regulating the allocation of asylum responsibility within the EU.
Malta has a similar geographic situation to Italy and Greece and has clearly had to deal with emergency situations in the past,which would have been eligible for such a relocation scheme.
Despite the confirmation by the Court of Justice of the EU of the validity of the relocation scheme in its ruling from the 6 September, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland remain in breach of their legal obligations.
The relocation scheme, on the other hand, is a temporary mechanism aiming to redistribute people in clear need of international protection, so as to ensure fair burden-sharing among Member States and decrease the pressure on the frontline Member States.
States should also refrain from initiating Dublin procedures regarding the countries benefitting from the relocation scheme, Italy and Greece, as the application of the Dublin Regulation is counter-intuitive to the aim of alleviating pressure on those countries' asylum systems.
Greece to increase reception capacity to 30,000 places by the end of the year, and to support UNHCR to provide rent subsidies andhost family programmes for at least 20,000 more- a pre-condition to make the emergency relocation scheme work;