Examples of using Relocation scheme in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Interactions with emergency relocation schemes based on Article 78(3) TFEU.
The relocation scheme should not be used as a justification to neglect a person's human rights.
Effective implementation of the Eurodac Regulation is essential for the functioning of the Dublin system and EU relocation schemes.
The relocation scheme is only intended for those“in clear need of international protection”.
An effective application of these policies will contribute to a strengthening of the Schengen and Dublin systems and of the emergency relocation scheme.
The relocation schemes proposed by the Commission also make full implementation of EU rules a priority.
The Commission is reporting today on the implementation of the temporary emergency relocation schemes and the European resettlement scheme. .
MEPs vote on proposals for relocation schemes for refugees and EU humanitarian visa and also asses the human rights situation in Turkey.
Subject to a further impact assessment,the Commission to propose in 2012 a voluntary, permanent relocation scheme for beneficiaries of international protection.
The relocation scheme provides for the relocation of 160,000 people in clear need of international protection from Italy and Greece to other Member States.
The Reports assess progress on the hotspot system and relocation scheme in Italy and Greece and the measures in the adopted after the on the 25 October.
Malta has a similar geographic situation to Italy andGreece and has clearly had to deal with emergency situations in the past, which would have been eligible for such a relocation scheme.
EU politicians have characterised the relocation scheme as a question of solidarity with member states on the EU's borders.
The share of the overall pledged resettlement places will be allocated to each Member State on the basis of the same distribution key as explained above for the relocation scheme(see Table 2 below).
More effective implementation of the emergency relocation schemes and more returns to Turkey and to countries of origin should also reduce the pressure on Greece.
The Commission proposed to use the emergency response mechanism under Article 78(3)of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to set up an emergency relocation scheme to assist Italy and Greece.
The temporary emergency relocation scheme was established in two Council Decisions in September 2015, in which Member States committed to relocate persons in need of international protection from Italy and Greece.
In its report,the LIBE Committee of the European Parliament has called upon the Commission to make a proposal for a permanent relocation scheme, to be adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure10.
Malta has a similar geographic situation to Italy andGreece and has clearly had to deal with emergency situations in the past, which would have been eligible for such a relocation scheme.
We have sent our experts to Greece and Italy to make the hotspots and relocation scheme function, and pushed all Member States to properly apply the EU's common asylum rules.
The temporary emergency relocation scheme was established in two Council Decisions in September 2015 in which Member States committed to relocate 160,000 people from Italy and Greece(and if relevant from other Member States) by September 2017.
Greece has committed to increasing reception capacity to 30,000 places for asylum seekers in Greece by the end of the year, andwill be supported by the UNHCR in providing at least 20,000 more- a pre-condition to make the emergency relocation scheme work.
In order to meet the commitments allocated so far under the relocation scheme, around 5,600 relocations per month should be achieved as a minimum, implying a relocation procedure of a maximum period of two weeks(see Annex).
The relocation scheme should not be used as a justification to neglect a person's human rights. So far, it appears to be mandatory for asylum seekers and it is not clear whether the consent, preferences and needs of the individual will be taken into account.”.
The remaining third country nationals who have orwho have not applied for international protection will fall outside the relocation scheme and remain under the responsibility of Italy and Greece or of the State which has been identified as the Member State responsible pursuant to Regulation(EU) No 604/2013.
The supplementary corrective mechanism could emerge from the crisis relocation scheme proposed by the Commission in September last year17, to be triggered in situations risking to jeopardize the application of the Dublin Regulation due to heavy pressures characterised by a large and disproportionate inflow of third country nationals which place significant demands on the asylum system of a Member State.
The proposal also recalls the consequences of the secondary movements of the applicants for orbeneficiaries of international protection which were part of the relocation scheme based on the currently applicable EU law, i.e. where they enter without authorisation into the territory of another Member State than the responsible one(in this case, the Member State of relocation). .
Apart from the emergency component of a future permanent relocation scheme, in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons, the Commission will always consider activating the mechanism of the Temporary Protection Directive when the conditions are met.
In particular, the Commission proposed the two temporary crisis relocation schemes agreed in September, which provide for the transfer of responsibility for certain asylum claimants from Italy and Greece to other Member States.
Underlines its readiness to deal with the new emergency relocation scheme in a fast-track procedure and declares its intention to advance all other measures proposed by the Commission in parallel in order toensure that Member States do not delay the permanent relocation scheme;