Примери за използване на Seal hunters на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Seal hunters' beastly killing methods are too much to swallow.
The allegation must therefore be understood to mean that the seal hunters had committed two offences.
The seal hunters deny that more than one female harp seal had been killed.
When we first marry, you were following seal hunters… and when you come home, you smell like them.
However, this cannot excuse the absence of any concern to attempt to protect the reputation of the seal hunters.
We know our seal hunters and also have a certain knowledge of… inspector Mr Lindberg.
This assertion must be understood to mean that the seal hunters committed acts of cruelty to the animals.
The report made by the seal hunters and the Ministry of Fisheries, its contents had not been effectively and objectively refuted….
This statement must imply that the seal hunters had assaulted Mr Lindberg, which, objectively speaking, amounts to a criminal act, cf. Article 228 of the Penal Code.
One statement-“Seals skinned alive”- was deemed to mean that the seal hunters had committed acts of cruelty to the animals.
Norwegian[seal hunters in the Arctic Ocean] are diligent and responsible and have much higher morals than regular Norwegian hunters when it comes to killing animals…'”.
It thus must be taken as accepted that the seal hunters were defamed in the articles published by Bladet Tromsø.
Although many people in Norway, especially in northern Norway, were opposed to Mr Lindberg,this did not automatically mean that there was a corresponding support for the seal hunters.
Its contents had been disputed by the seal hunters, a shipowner and the Ministry of Fisheries.
This approach of the majority illustrates the main fault-line running through the judgment,namely that the Court does not give sufficient weight to the reputation of the seal hunters.
However it cannot be doubted that the seal hunters involved in these proceedings are private persons par excellence.
On 19 July 1988 the newspaper Adresseavisen, referring to the news bulletins issued by the Norwegian News Agency,stated that the seal hunters had requested that Mr Lindberg's report be made public.
Even though the names of individual seal hunters had been deleted, it was clear that the Harmoni was the vessel at issue.
While it can hardly be argued that the identification of the persons concerned corresponded to any public interest,it would have been possible for Bladet Tromsø to protect the seal hunters' reputation simply by leaving out any reference to the Harmoni.
I can tell you that there are now seal hunters who cannot sleep and who are receiving telephone calls day and night.'.
Also of relevance for the balancing of competing interests which the Court must carry out is the fact that under Article 6§ 2 of the Convention the seal hunters had a right to be presumed innocent of any criminal offence until proved guilty.
Another was understood to imply that seal hunters had committed criminal assault on and threat against the seal hunting inspector.
In the Court's opinion, the attitude expressed by the Ministry before 20 July 1988 does not constitute a ground for considering that it was unreasonable for the newspaper to regard as reliable the information contained in the report,including the four statements published on 20 July to the effect that specific but unnamed seal hunters had killed female harp seals(see paragraph 13 above).
On the other hand, the District Court rejected the seal hunters' claim with respect to the following statements published on 20 July 1988.
In my opinion the majority do not give sufficient weight to the fact that,under Article 6§ 2 of the Convention, the seal hunters had a right to be presumed innocent of any criminal offence until proved guilty.
Despite the refutations of the report made by the seal hunters and the Ministry of Fisheries, its contents had not been effectively and objectively refuted….
He routinely takes men hostage, castaways such as van Weyden and seal hunters from other ships, and uses them to fill his own ranks when needed.
Since Bladet Tromsø did not issue a disclaimer,it ought to be recognised that the seal hunters had a legitimate need for recourse to defamation proceedings in order to protect their reputation and rights.
This measure must be seen in the light of the right of every person,including the seal hunters, under Article 6§ 2 to be presumed innocent of any criminal offence until proved guilty.