Примери за използване на Sergianism на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
But let us return to Sergianism itself.
In Sergianism things are much more complicated.
The recent events have finally made clear the renovationist nature of Sergianism.
The specific role of Sergianism in the modern antichurch front.
Sergianism also implies an expression of a certain ecclesiological view.
The views and assessments of the church opposition regarding Sergianism vary widely.
Sergianism not only reduces the Church to the visible church organization.
The believers who sensed the lies and betrayal of Sergianism were in a very difficult situation.
First, Sergianism is not a specifically Russian phenomenon; it is inherent in the entire modern official Orthodoxy.
However, they are meaningful not only regarding the ecclesiological situation in Russia, because Sergianism is not a typically Russian phenomenon alone.
From this perspective, Sergianism is an even more insidious and more dangerous enemy of the Orthodox consciousness than ecumenism.
This blind concept of obedience for its own sake is one of the chief causes for the success of Sergianism in our centuryboth within and outside the Moscow Patriarchate.
In Russia, Sergianism represented an internal betrayal, which subjected the Church to the militant atheistic reign and turned it into a tool of its policy.
However, the very‘‘canonicity'', this key concept for Sergianism, is justified in a manner similar to‘‘belonging'' to the‘‘ecumenical Church''.
Of course, Sergianism is not such an open anti-church phenomenon as renovationism, and this is where the complexity of this second fight of the Russian confessors, which began after 1927.
A profound church instinct tells him that, despite the tragedy of Sergianism all the sincere Orthodox believers of Russia are still part of the same Church."17.
Sergianism destroys the prerequisites for genuine sobornost, by turning it into a screen concealing the arbitrariness and tyranny of the ecclesiastical authorities towards the clergy and the congregation.
So, since the 1960's onwards ecumenism and Sergianism were two factors working together in order to destroy the Orthodox Church.
In the heat of the fight in post-revolutionary Russia, it was not easy at all to find the right direction andexpose the treacherous ideas of Sergianism, which impaired the very concept of the Church Herself.
The expectation to undertake an assessment of both Sergianism and the struggle of the true Orthodox was not an end in itself or an expression of some concealed revenge.
Sergianism had not only not“saved” the Church, but, on the contrary, had assisted the loss of true ecclesiastical freedom and turned the Church administration into the obedient tool of the atheist authorities.
Seraphim used an example referring to the deviations to the"left"- towards Sergianism- in order to draw attention to one of the most characteristic distortions in the deviations to the"right".
Although Sergianism is characterized by the unnatural symbiosis between the church hierarchy and the anti-church atheistic authorities, at the same time it is not just a church and a political phenomenon.
It is precisely then that the polemic against the contemporary forms of apostasy such as ecumenism and Sergianism, has its own meaning and justification, and only then can we avoid their diametrically opposite extremes.
A distinctive feature of Sergianism is that the main tool in the hands of the atheistic authorities for the total subjugation and destruction of the Church is the very church hierarchy.
However reality itself refuted the apologists of Sergianism, who stressed the‘‘saving'' of the Church in order to justify their alliance with the anti-Christian Bolshevik authorities.
Seraphim about Sergianism, directly or through the words of the quoted by him confessors of the Russian Church, refers not only to the Moscow Patriarchate but also to the rest of the official Orthodox churches.
None of this changes in the least our basic attitude towards Sergianism as a betrayal of the church, nor does it allow us who are free to enter into communion with the Moscow Patriarchate.
There it was known as“Sergianism“, named after the notorious Metropolitan Sergius(Stragorodski), who was to become the first head of the Moscow Patriarchate during the Communist era.
On the contrary, we must unmask the wickedness of Sergianism, for which it is very important to include in its“pantheon” Confessors who shone forth in the struggle for freedom of the Church.