Примери за използване на State electoral на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
State Electoral College.
Outwardly, it appears to give the State Electoral College the power to grant or refuse exemption.
State Electoral Commission.
The campaign officially began on Saturday(November 3rd),the deadline for all candidates to submit their lists to the State Electoral Committee.
The State Electoral College.
The parties agreed that sources of campaign financing should not go unidentified andthat the parties should submit their financial reports within 15 days to the State Electoral Commission.
The State Electoral College.
The applicants submitted that the effective- and ultimate- power to acknowledge orreject their claim to privileges under section 5 of the 1993 Elections Act was vested in the State Electoral College(see paragraph 79 above).
(2) The expenditure of the State Electoral Office shall be covered from the state budget.
The privileges[referred to above] are conferred on electoral committees of registered national minorities and, in caseof doubt[as to whether or not an electoral committee represents a national minority], the State Electoral College may request evidence.
The state electoral commission is expected to announce preliminary results by Thursday evening and final results two days later.
Second, on receipt of a declaration under the 1993 Elections Act from an electoral committee of a registered organisation of a national minority, the State Electoral College was required to determine whether it had been submitted by a competent body and was supported by satisfactory evidence.
On the other hand, the State Electoral College does not verify the content of the declaration, for which the electoral committee takes full responsibility.
(1) Electoral committees of registered organisations of national minorities may be exempted from one of the conditions referred to in section 3(1) or section 4, provided that, not later than thefifth day before the date of the election, they submit to the State Electoral College a declaration to that effect[6].
Preliminary results, confirmed by the state electoral commission, showed that Zagreb Mayor Milan Bandic received just over 60% of the vote.
Secondly, section 5(1) reserves the privilege of exemption from electoral thresholds to lists of candidates supplied by the electoral committees of one or more registered national minority organisations, andonly committees of that type may submit corresponding declarations to the State Electoral College.
The state electoral commission said on Monday that For a European Serbia won 38.44% of the vote and will occupy 102 of the 250 seats in the country's legislature.
Under Polish law, as authoritatively interpreted by the Polish Supreme Court,therefore, the procedure before the State Electoral College could not- after the registration of the association- serve to prevent its members from acquiring special electoral status(see paragraphs 36 and 42-43 above).
The state electoral commission is expected to announce final results on Monday, when the Election Observation Mission deployed in Montenegro by the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights is also due to issue a statement of preliminary findings and conclusions.
In that connection, they argued that not only had that finding been unsupported by any evidence showing that that was indeed their intention, but also that registration of their association would not have conferred on them any such privileges automatically since, in the absence of any definition of theconcept of“national minority” in Polish law, that issue had been left for the State Electoral College to decide.
Determining which documents are to be accepted by the State Electoral College as confirmation of the electoral committee's entitlement to submit the declaration referred to in section 5(1) is a separate issue….
When considering the legal consequences of registering the association with the statement in its memorandum of association that it was“an organisation of the Silesian national minority”, the Supreme Court evidently worked on the assumption that,had the members of the association run for election, the State Electoral College would have had no choice but to accept their declaration under section 5 of the 1993 Elections Act(see paragraph 36 above).
In accordance with section 5(2), the State Electoral College is required to acknowledge, without delay, receipt of the declaration referred to in subsection(1), in other words, a declaration that has been submitted by an entity entitled to do so.
With 88.5 percent of votes counted Sunday night,Macedonia's State Electoral Commission reported 91.33 percent voted yes(if favor of changing the name of the country to North Macedonia) and 5.76 percent voted no, Balkan Insight reports.
At that stage the State Electoral College would have had no power to reject the declaration stating that the applicants had constituted an electoral committee of a registered organisation of a national minority, because their status would have been confirmed officially by the content of their memorandum of association and, in particular, paragraph 30 thereof.
Such a reading of the relevant provisions of domestic law,limiting the role of the State Electoral College to controlling technical and formal matters, with no competence to examine substantive criteria such as the existence or not of a“national minority”, cannot, in the Court's opinion, be regarded as arbitrary.
In consequence, the State Electoral College would have had the ultimate power to acknowledge or reject their claim to privileges under the 1993 Elections Act, as was apparent not only from section 5 but also from the general provisions of the Act, which obliged the College to ensure compliance with its provisions.
In practice, this amounts to a responsibility to submit to the State Electoral College documents unambiguously demonstrating that the electoral committee submitting the declaration is an entity entitled to do so, that is to say, the electoral committee of not just any organisation, but of one or more registered national minority organisations.
It can be assumed that the State Electoral College may require the presentation of appropriate documents, such as a memorandum of association, that will allow it unambiguously to ascertain that the entity submitting the declaration is the electoral committee of one or more registered national minority organisations.”.
If such documents are not submitted, the State Electoral College is precluded from acknowledging receipt of the declaration referred to in section 5(1), since, apart from the requirement that it be made at the prescribed time to the appropriate electoral college, a vital condition for the validity of the declaration is that it be made by an entitled entity.