Примери за използване на The tomos на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Tomos of Autocephaly.
The tomos is essentially another declaration of Ukrainian independence.
Neither is there such a rule in the tomos on the granting of autocephaly to the Bulgarian Church(1945).
The tomos from January 5 names the newly-created church“The Holy Church of Ukraine.
It turns out that the tomos doesn't unite, but yet further divides Ukrainian society.
The tomos does not suggest appeals to other autocephalous churches for similar explanations.
Indeed, Patriarch Cyril is aware that he cannot stop the issue of the Tomos for autocephaly of the United Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
In the text of the tomos, it is stated that this is a symbol of the Church's unity.
The Tomos, which is the decision that is issued, is at the last stage of this implementation.
So far as we know, during the preparation of the tomos the Patriarchate of Constantinople a slightly different name:“The Orthodox Church in Ukraine”.
The tomos from January 5 states that the OCU should also receive chrism from the Patriarch of Constantinople.
It turns out that the tomos doesn't unite, but yet further divides Ukrainian society.
The Tomos of autocephaly would be for us a limitation of the freedom we now enjoy, and we do not need anything".
For the analysis of the tomos, the text placed on the PC official website was used WEB.
The Tomos of Autocephaly restored communion between the Moscow Patriarchate and the Orthodox Church in America.
Hereinafter, after receiving the tomos of autocephaly in Kiev,the question who else will recognize the new church still remains.
The tomos states that in Ukraine«civil and church leaders have avidly sought its ecclesiastical self-administration over more than thirty years».
It is specifically stated in the tomos that it is being awarded not only to the Metropolitan of Kiev, but also to the President of Ukraine.
The tomos groundlessly states that the PC“is obliged(ὑποχρεωμένον) by a lengthy canonical tradition to care for the holy Orthodox Churches facing difficulties”.
After the procedure for the signing of the tomos, statements will be made by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, Metropolitan of Kyiv and All Ukraine Epiphanius, and President Petro Poroshenko.
The tomos of autocephaly will complete the establishment of Ukraine's independence and self-rule, will strengthen religious freedom and inter-faith peace.
In the tomos from January 5, however, it is clearly stated that the jurisdiction of the OCU is limited to the territory of Ukraine.
As we have seen, the Tomos establishes a quite rigid framework for the further development of the OCU.
In the tomos on the autocephaly of the Church of Greece(1850), no mention is made of ecclesiastical hierarchs appealing to Constantinople.
With the signing of the tomos, the procedure for obtaining church independence is officially completed.
In the tomos on the autocephaly of the OCU, we also find unequivocal statements about the special status of the See of Constantinople.
Perhaps the issuing of the tomos without taking into account the opinion of the UOC and the Local Churches was a mistake?