Примери за използване на The two treatment на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
How do the two treatments work?
And the difference between the two treatments?
The two treatments were equally effective.
And the difference between the two treatments?
The two treatments work in different ways.
Хората също превеждат
What is the difference between the two treatments?
Common to the two treatment areas is a specific set of diagnostic activities.
So what is the difference between the two treatments?
The two treatment groups were well balanced in terms of baseline demographics and disease characteristics.
There were no differences between the two treatment arms.
The two treatments were deemed effective, but the short side-effect profile of CBD out shined the pharmaceutical option.
There was no benefit in combining the two treatments.
The two treatment procedures- Purvakarma and Panchakarma help to treat a large number of diseases and restore balance in the body.
There were no differences in safety parameters between the two treatment arms.
At lower pollen counts, there were no differences between the two treatments.
Mean haemoglobin levels were similar for the two treatment groups throughout the postsurgical period.
There were no differences in safety parameters between the two treatment arms.
The two treatment groups were generally balanced with respect to the baseline demographics of disease characteristics.
The two treatment arms were generally well balanced with respect to demographic and baseline disease characteristics and history of prior anti-SEGA therapies.
OS was not statistically significantly different between the two treatment groups.
In fact, the two treatments were found to offer a similar level of relief from anxiety as the above medication, suggesting ashwagandha might be as effective for reducing anxiety.
Lt; 2.5 µg/l andnormalisation of IGF-1 at the same time point was also comparable between the two treatment arms.
In the majority of cases, there was no significant difference in the incidence of specific adverse events between the two treatment arms.
There was a significant difference(p< 0.0001) between the two treatment groups in the time to relapse in favour of TREVICTA.
There were no statistically significant differences in any of these endpoints between the two treatment groups.
Comparable improvements over baseline were reported at study end for the two treatment groups in morning pulmonary expiratory flow rate(primary endpoint), clinical symptoms scores and the use of rescue salbutamol.