Примери за използване на To judicial independence на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
- 
                        Official
                    
 - 
                        Colloquial
                    
 - 
                        Medicine
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Computer
                    
 
There are current threats to judicial independence on the horizon.
Given that independence  is traditionally linked to  the judiciary,some evidence exists in relation to judicial independence.
The threat to judicial independence is not always governmental.
Hungary's Judges Warn of Threats to Judicial Independence.
Challenges to judicial independence are a serious source of concern.”.
A report by judges and prosecutors, prepared at the request of the Council of Europe,highlights a number of potential threats to judicial independence in Spain.
Challenges to judicial independence are a serious source of concern," the Commission said.
Guidelines issued by European and international bodies,embodying principles shared by the Member States relating to judicial independence, also provide a useful point of reference.
This applies notably to judicial independence, judicial  reform and tackling high-level corruption.
In conclusion, it can be asserted that the more involvement of executive andlegislative powers in judicial  administration the more potential threats exist to judicial independence.
Without prejudice to judicial independence, Member States shall ensure that decisions to  be taken pursuant to  this paragraph are taken without undue delay.
The members of this body are appointed by Parliament through a quota agreement between the main political parties, which,in the words of these experts,"poses a potential threat to judicial independence.".
The key institutions of Romania would need to  collectively demonstrate a strong commitment to judicial independence and the fight against corruption as indispensable cornerstones, and to  ensure the capacity of national safeguards and checks and balances.
The vote will give parliament and the government a far greater say in the makeup of the country's top court-- a measure which opponents claimed was a blow to judicial independence and a move towards autocracy.
Without prejudice to judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Union, Member States shall ensure that the judiciary,judicial  schools and legal professions boost their judicial  training schemes to  ensure that Union law and procedures are integrated in national training activities.
The Court has held, with regard to  the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU,that protection against removal from office of the members of the body concerned is one of the guarantees essential to judicial independence.
Article 11 Training Without prejudice to judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Union, Member States shall request those responsible for the training of judges, prosecutors, police, judicial  and those competent authorities staff involved in criminal proceedings and investigations to  provide appropriate training with respect to  the objectives of this Directive.
The irremovability of judges, along with security of tenure, are also recognised as fundamental guarantees of judicial independence  in guidelines(51) issued by European andinternational bodies relating to judicial independence.
Without prejudice to judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Member States, and with due respect for the role of those responsible for the training of judges and prosecutors, Member States shall take appropriate measures to  ensure that judges and prosecutors who deal with criminal proceedings involving children have specific competence in that field, effective access to  specific training, or both.
The implementation of the contested retirement regime is being accelerated, which is regarded as creating a risk of serious andirreparable damage to judicial independence in Poland, and therefore of the EU legal order.
It is important to  note that the UN Special Rapporteur on the independence  of judges and lawyers andthe UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention qualified the arrest of Judge María Lourdes Afiuni as a deeply disturbing blow to judicial independence.
Moves to  overhaul judicial  legislation and oust chief prosecutors and judges have dominated the public agenda since the Social Democrats came to  power in early 2017,and threats to judicial independence could intensify a creep away from democratic values in some of the EU's eastern member states.
It should be pointed out that, in its Opinion No 904/2017, footnote 4, particularly points 89 to  95,128 to  131, the Venice Commission considered the combined effects of the Polish legislation on the NCJ and the Disciplinary Chamber, along with other reforms, as posing a grave threat to judicial independence.
The implementation of the contested retirement regime for Supreme Court judges in Poland is being accelerated and is creating a risk of serious andirreparable damage to judicial independence in Poland, and therefore of the EU legal order.
The attention of the Honourable Member is however drawn to  the Resolution of the Council and of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 24 October 2008 inviting Member States to  adhere to  certain guidelines when organising training for judges, prosecutors and judicial  staff(such as assistants, law-clerks and registrars),without prejudice to judicial independence or different judicial  organisations in the European Union.
A final conviction in an emblematic high-level corruption cases in June and the actions of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the Superior Council of the Magistracy[11]and of the Constitutional Court in resisting political challenges to judicial independence and in affirming professional integrity in the aftermath of this verdict has marked a step change in this sense.
The Commission went on to  state:“The implementation of the contested retirement regime for Supreme Court judges in Poland is being accelerated and is creating a risk of serious andirreparable damage to judicial independence in Poland, and therefore of the EU legal order.”.