Примери за използване на Union industry's на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
During the period considered the Union industry's profits declined.
The Union industry's sales volume and market share developed over the period considered as follows.
In the period considered the Union industry's stocks increased overall by 18%.
The Union industry's sales on the EU market increased by 23% over the period considered and market shares developed from 24,4% to 31,1%, i.e.
This would very likely lead to a serious deterioration of the Union industry's financial situation.
The net cash flow is the Union industry's ability to self-finance their activities and it was positive during the period considered.
In the absence of measures, a further deterioration in the Union industry's situation appears unavoidable.
Concerning the second claim, the Union industry's capacity is indeed not comparable to the one achieved by the Chinese exporting producers in the recent years.
However, Chinese export prices to third countries as shown in Table 1 undercut the Union industry's sales prices by more than 25% on average.
In order toestablish whether or not the Union industry suffered material injury and to determine consumption and other economic indicators, it was examined whether and to what extent the subsequent use of the Union industry's production of the like product(‘captive' use) had to be taken into account.
As such, the domestic profitability and the Union industry's target profit were not comparable.
These price comparisons showed that Chinese import prices to the Union market,without the anti-dumping duty, were on average 44 % lower than the Union industry's prices.
In the absence of measures,a further deterioration of the Union industry's economic and financial situation is very likely.".
However, in establishing the likelihood of continuation of injury, the Commission has not compared Chinese sales prices and volumes with Indian sales prices and volumes butrather compared it with the Union industry's sales volumes and prices.
In the absence of any comments regarding the effect of the Union industry's export performance, the conclusions reached in recitals 110 to 112 were confirmed.
A part of the Union industry is vertically integrated and, as far as the production of cells is concerned, a substantial part of the Union industry's production was destined for captive use(96%).
The massive imports of the Chinese dumped products caused the Union industry's profitability to drastically go down, effectively preventing it from making new investments to achieve economies of scale.
During the part of the period considered preceding the investigation period(meaning 2011 and 2012) the Union industry's production volume decreased or stagnated.
The cooperating importers, acting as wholesalers and systems integrators(55),also sold the Union industry's modules; therefore they benefitted both from the increase in the market share of the imports from the rest of the world(‘RoW') and the increase in the market share of the Union industry. .
On this basis it can be expected that Chinese imports will likely be made at prices significantly undercutting the Union industry's sales prices should the anti-dumping duties be repealed.
This influx would likely cause, amongst others, loss of market share, decrease in sales prices,decrease in capacity utilisation and in general a serious deterioration of the Union industry's financial situation.
As explained in recitals(215) to(218), the Chinese import prices were substantially below the Union industry's sales prices despite the anti-dumping measures in force during the period considered.
The dumping continued during the review investigation periodat a significant level, as explained under Section 3 above and the Chinese exporting producers' prices continued to undercut Union industry's sales prices to a significant extent.
In their comments on the final disclosure,CCCME claimed that the difference in prices of Chinese imports and Union industry's sales was due to the difference in the products being compared instead of dumped and injurious import prices, and that the Commission failed to make a price comparison based on product types.
Thus, recital 84 of the contested regulation shows that the price comparison was made at the same level of trade,namely by taking into account the prices at an ex‑works level for the Union industry's sales and the CIF prices for Jindal Saw's sales.
The significant dumping practised by the Chinese producers had a negative effect on the Union industry's performance, as these prices severely undercut Union industry's sales prices.
In order to establish whether the Union industry continued to suffer injury and to determine consumption and the various economic indicators related to the situation of the Union industry, the Commission examined whether and to what extent the subsequent use of the Union industry's production of the like product(‘captive use') had to be taken into account in the analysis.
It can be expected that if these increased imports were made at prices significantly undercutting the Union industry's sales price, this would likely exercise a downward price pressure on the Union market.
Indeed, it follows from paragraphs 62 and 63 of that judgment that, in that case, the Court considered that the prices used in the undercutting calculation should be prices negotiated with independent buyers, namely prices which could have beentaken into account by them in order to decide whether they purchased the Union industry's products or the products of the exporting producers in question, and not the prices at an intermediate stage.
Furthermore, during the original investigation, the Commission did not collect any data regarding Union industry's profit for a period before the period considered.