Примери за използване на Use of their works на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Rightholders should receive an appropriate reward for the use of their works or other subject matter.
In principle, authors have an interest in sharing in the profits generated as a result of profit-oriented use of their works.
In addition, transparency on the revenues generated by the use of their works or performances often remains limited.
We support the consideration of measures that would improve the ability for creators to receive fair remuneration for the use of their works online….
Member States may provide for fair compensation for rightholders for the use of their works or other subject matter pursuant to paragraph 1.
Making internet companies liable will enhance right holders' chances(notably musicians, performers and script authors, as well as news publishers and journalists) to secure fair licensing agreements,thereby obtaining fairer remuneration for the use of their works exploited digitally.
Copyright holders will receive additional revenues from the use of their works online as well as greater protection from online copyright infringement.
Very often, authors of photographs, texts andother copyrighted content become victims of unauthorized use of their works on the Internet.
We support the consideration of measures that would improve the ability for creators to receive fair remuneration for the use of their works online[…] But we cannot support Article 13, which would mandate Internet platforms to embed an automated infrastructure for monitoring and censorship deep into their networks”.
The purpose of that compensation is to contribute towards ensuring that rightholders receive appropriate remuneration for the use of their works or other subject-matter.
(82) Nothing in this Directive should be interpreted as preventing holders of exclusive rights under Union copyright law from authorising the use of their works or other subject matter for free, including through non-exclusive free licences for the benefit of any users.
The deal aims at enhancing rights holders' chances, notably musicians, performers and script authors, as well as news publishers,to negotiate better remuneration deals for the use of their works featured on internet platforms.
Such fair compensation must help to ensure that rightholders receive appropriate remuneration for the use of their works or other protected subject-matter.
Online content sharing service providers referred to in paragraph -1a shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take appropriate andproportionate measures to ensure the functioning of licensing agreements where concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter on those services.
Without prejudice to paragraph 2, Member States shall provide for fair compensation to rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1.
The directive aims to enhance rights holders' chances, notably musicians, performers and script authors,(creatives) as well as news publishers,to negotiate better remuneration deals for the use of their works when these feature on internet platforms.
The agreement aims to increase the opportunities for rights holders, including musicians, performers and scriptwriters, as well as press publishers,to negotiate better compensation arrangements for the use of their works on Internet platforms,"said the European Parliament.
It is to be noted that the principal objective of Directive 2001/29 is to establish a high level of protection of authors,allowing them to obtain an appropriate reward for the use of their works, including on the occasion of communication to the public.
In this regard, it is to be noted first of all that the principal objective of the Copyright Directive is to establish a high level of protection of authors,allowing them to obtain an appropriate reward for the use of their works, including on the occasion of communication to the public.
In that regard, it should be borne in mind that it follows from recitals 9 and 10 of Directive 2001/29 that the latter's objective is to establish a high level of protection for authors,allowing them to obtain an appropriate reward for the use of their works, including on the occasion of communication to the public.
Such an interpretation is moreover essential to achieve the principal objective of that directive, which, as can be seen from[recitals 9 and 10], is to establish a high level of protection of, inter alia, authors,allowing them to obtain an appropriate reward for the use of their works, in particular on the occasion of communication to the public'.
With respect to the scope of such protection of a work, it follows from recitals 9 to 11 in the preamble to Directive 2001/29 that its main objective is to introduce a high level of protection,in particular for authors to enable them to receive an appropriate reward for the use of their works, including at the time of reproduction of those works, in order to be able to pursue their creative and artistic work. .
(10) If authors or performers are to continue their creative and artistic work, they have to receive an appropriate reward for the use of their work….
(13) It also stated that only in this way is it possible to achieve the objective mentioned in recitals 9 and 10, of establishing a high level of protection of authors andgiving them an appropriate reward for the use of their work.
(10) If authors or performers are to continue their creative and artistic work, they have to receive an appropriate reward for the use of their work, as must producers in order to be able to finance this work. .
Calls on the Commission to consider evidence-based options to address any lack of transparency and transfer of value from content to services that will make it possible for authors, performers andright holders to be fairly remunerated for the use of their work on the internet without hampering innovation;
That interpretation is consistent with the objectives of that directive set out in recitals 9 to 11, which state that the harmonisation of copyright must take as a basis a high level of protection,that authors have to receive an appropriate reward for the use of their work and that the system for the protection of copyright must be rigorous and effective(see judgment in Peek& Cloppenburg, C‑456/06, EU: C: 2008:232, paragraph 37).