Примери за използване на Victory of socialism in one на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The victory of socialism in one country is not a self-sufficient task.
Then, he implies the possibility of the victory of socialism in one country?
Can the final victory of socialism in one country be attained, without the joint efforts of the proletariat of several advanced countries?
What do we mean by the possibility of the victory of Socialism in one country?
And by the victory of Socialism in one country Zinoviev means the sort of Socialist construction which cannot and should not lead to the complete building of Socialism. .
Where does Zinoviev stand on the question of the victory of Socialism in one country?
Here is what he said about the victory of socialism in one country even before the October Revolution, in August 1915.
Where does Zinoviev stand as regards the question of the victory of socialism in one country?
Trotsky's‘permanent revolution' means that the victory of socialism in one country, in this case Russia, is impossible without direct state support from the European proletariat', i.e.
How can this strange"theory" be reconciled with Lenin's theory of the"victory of socialism in one country"?
And by the victory of socialism in one country Zinoviev understands the kind of building socialism which cannot and should not lead to completely building socialism. .
With regard to the presentation of the question of the victory of socialism in one country, this pamphlet states.
It signifies that by the final victory of Socialism in one country Zinoviev means, not the guarantee against intervention and restoration, but the possibility of completely building Socialist society.
What is there in common between this“theory” and Lenin's thesis on the possibility of the victory of socialism“in one capitalist country taken separately”?
He asserts that the victory of socialism in one country is impossible, that the victory of socialism is possible only as the victory of several of the principal countries of Europe(Britain, Russia, Germany), which combine into a.
What is there in common between this‘theory' and Lenin's thesis on the possibility of the victory of socialism‘in one capitalist-country taken separately'?
The victory of socialism in one country, even if this country is less developed in the capitalist sense, while capitalism is preserved in other countries, even if these countries are more developed in the capitalist sense- is quite possible and probable.”.
What is there in common between this"theory" and Lenin's thesis on the possibility of the victory of socialism"in one capitalist country taken separately"?
What is meant by the impossibility of the complete, final victory of socialism in one country without the victory of the revolution in other countries?
As you see, we have before us the same theory of the simultaneous victory of socialism in the principal countries of Europe which, as a rule,excludes Lenin's theory of revolution about the victory of socialism in one country.
There can be no doubt that the universal theory of a simultaneous victory of the revolution in the principal countries of Europe,the theory that the victory of socialism in one country is impossible, has proved to be an artificial and untenable theory.
Secondly, the fact that the dictatorship of the proletariat became established in our country as a result of the victory of socialism in one country a country in which capitalism was little developed while capitalism was preserved in other countries where capitalism was more highly developed.
As far back as the period of the war, Lenin, taking as his basis the law of the uneven development of the imperialist states,opposed to the opportunists his theory of the proletarian revolution about the victory of socialism in one country, even if that country is one in which capitalism is less developed.
What difference is there between Trotsky's theory and the ordinary Menshevik theory that the victory of socialism in one country, and in a backward country at that, is impossible without the preliminary victory of the proletarian revolution in the principal countries of Western Europe?
It was this new formulation of the question that formed the basis for the well-known resolution of the Fourteenth Party Conference“The Tasks of the Comintern andthe R.C.P.(B.),”20 which examines the question of the victory of socialism in one country in connection with the stabilisation of capitalism(April 1925), and considers that the building of socialism by the efforts of our country is possible and necessary.
Is it not true that the question of imperialism, the question of the spasmodic character of the development of imperialism,the question of the victory of socialism in one country, the question of the proletarian state, the question of the Soviet form of this state, the question of the role of the Party in the system of the dictatorship of the proletariat, the question of the paths of building socialism-- that all these questions were elaborated precisely by Lenin?