Примери коришћења Abuse of dominant position на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Abuse of dominant position.
An Act to amend the Competition Act(abuse of dominant position).
Abuse of dominant position.
Procedure examining the abuse of dominant position is initiated in January 2013.
Abuse of dominant position.
Opinions on the provisions of the Law on Protection of Competition concerning the abuse of dominant position.
Abuse of dominant position.
Gazmir Mani from the Albanian authority presented a case of abuse of dominant position in the mobile telephony market.
The administrative procedure was initiated due to the existence of a reasonable doubt that the company"Telekom Srbija" committed an abuse of dominant position.
Gazmir Mani from the Albanian authority presented a case of abuse of dominant position in the mobile telephony market.
Commission's decision on abuse of dominant position by PUC”Funeral Services” Belgrade of 27.11.2014 was confirmed by the judgement of Administrative Court of 07.05.2015.
SETimes: How do you see implementation of antitrust laws as they related to cartels, abuse of dominant position, etc?
Commission's decision on abuse of dominant position by PUC”Funeral Services” Belgrade of 27.11.2014 was confirmed by the judgement of Administrative Court of 07.05.2015.
Commission for Protection of Competition has maintained its level of activities from 2014,making decisions on abuse of dominant position and merger control.
Abuse of dominant position on the market is prohibited, especially in case of applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a disadvantage in relation to competitors.
Commission for Protection of Competition has maintained its level of activities from 2014,making decisions on abuse of dominant position and merger control.
Efficient competition policy provides also benefits for competitors,since by preventing cartels and abuse of dominant position, equal conditions for all undertakings are created. At this instant, Commission is not in position to deliver any additional information, as not to endanger further investigation procedures.
Key moments The forms of violations of competition are restrictive agreements, prescribed and defined in Article 10 of the Law, and abuse of dominant position, prescribed and defined by Article 16 of the Law.
Efficient competition policy provides also benefits for competitors,since by preventing cartels and abuse of dominant position, equal conditions for all undertakings are created. At this instant, Commission is not in position to deliver any additional information, as not to endanger further investigation procedures.
As before, the Commission will monitor and analyze the market situation in order to forestall, and if necessary, act upon and sanction all possible actions andacts which may constitute an abuse of dominant position and/or restrictive agreement.
The Interpretation of Provisions on Abuse of Dominant Position The Opinion in the Field of Public Works The Commission has been asked for opinion whether there is a breach of competition or abuse of dominant position in the Decision on fees for the right to connect to public sewer, which was made by the Board of Public Enterprise"Directorate of Construction and Urban Planning of Temerin Municipality", approved by Municipal Assembly of Temerin, and entered into force.
In 2015 the European Commission requested from BEH to transfer control of the ownership of the IBEX to prevent abuse of dominant position on the market for the wholesale supply of electricity.
Furthermore, the issue of competition protection and maintenance of media pluralism is reduced to the problem of illicit media concentration,absolutely ignoring both restrictive agreements and the abuse of dominant position.
Given that JP Stan filed a response that was not acceptable in terms of the Law, and the City Council did not plea, the ex officio procedure against JP Stan from Uţice was initiated, in order todetermine the existence of an act of abuse of dominant position in the market of services for maintenance of elevators in residential buildings in the town of Uţice, in terms of Article 16 of the Law on Protection of Competition.
The main topics discussed in the seminar touched upon various issues of competition law, such as the definition of the relevant market, use andstorage of confidential information in the investigation of competition infringements, abuse of dominant position, mergers, etc.
Confirmed decision of the Commission on abuse of dominant position by PUC”Funeral Services” BelgradeThe Supreme Court of Cassation's judgement of 26.10.2015 dismissed the request for review of judgement of Administrative Court, submitted by PUC”Funeral Services” Belgrade, by which the Supreme Court of Cassation upheld the judgement of Administrative Court, and therefore the legality of decision of Commission for Protection of Competition on abuse of dominant position by PUC”Funeral Services” Belgrade.
Indemnification process is achieved in civil court proceedings, and the Commission is aware that certain number of indemnification proceedings has started, for example,in the case of abuse of dominant position by IMLEK and Mlekara Subotica.
Confirmed decision of the Commission on abuse of dominant position by PUC”Funeral Services” BelgradeThe Supreme Court of Cassation's judgement of 26.10.2015 dismissed the request for review of judgement of Administrative Court, submitted by PUC”Funeral Services” Belgrade, by which the Supreme Court of Cassation upheld the judgement of Administrative Court, and therefore the legality of decision of Commission for Protection of Competition on abuse of dominant position by PUC”Funeral Services” Belgrade.
Opinions on the Application of Law on Protection of Competition The Commission issued 19 opinions at the request of market participants concerning the implementation of regulations in the field of restrictive agreements and abuse of dominant position, of which we mention only some.
Belgrade for the review of the judgment was refused- the judgment of the Administrative Court from November 6 2012, brought upon the claim of this company to the decision of the Commission in the reprocessfrom October 4 2012, which determines the abuse of dominant position by"Serbia Broadband- Srpske Kablovske mreţe"d.o.o. by conducting promotional activities in the township of Palilula and Stari Grad in March of 2006.