Примери коришћења Filioque на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Why the Filioque must go.
Filioque literally means"and from the Son.".
The Latin word filioque means"and from the Son.".
Filioque is a Latin term meaning“and the son.”.
It was rejectedby Patriarch Sergius II(999-1019) because it contained the filioque.
The"filioque" question is not settled.
Is this enough to explain the insistence of the Latin tradition on the Filioque?
Filioque is a Latin term which means‘and(from) the Son.'.
Cyril and Methodius recited the Creed in its original form,the Germans inserted the filioque.
The word filioque is a Latin term that means“and from the Son.”.
Year 808 Greek monks protested against the introduction by the Latins of the word Filioque into.
On the other hand, the filioque proclaims that the Holy Spirit originates from the Son of God Who has become man.
These obvious differences of perspective between East andWest constitute the background of the famous controversy on Filioque.
According to the Filioque teaching, it is impossible to see why the Holy Spirit could not be called a granson!
Maryana's father, Fathallah, tried to defuse the sectarian conflict by writing a treatise in 1849,in which he rejected the Filioque.
By the Filioque teaching, the Holy Spirit is two degrees or steps removed from the Father, and thus has a much lower rank than the Son.
Then the Orthodox were obliged to declare that the filioque, as an addition within the Symbol of Faith, hadalways been a canonical and blessed act.
This degeneration is the result of Heterodoxy's failure to first identify and then exclude its own essence,its original error, the filioque.
But the rationalists, through the filioque, had distanced and removed the Spirit of Truth, fixing Him between the Father and the Son.
What is more, no Byzantine canonist orapologist ever thought that Latin theological errors, such as the filioque, were so great that they required rebaptism.
It is not only the filioque, the primacy of authority, and the‘infallibility' of the Pope which are basic differences between the Orthodox Church and the Papists.
Since humanism first clearly arose at the very end of the eleventh century,it seems clear to us that the origin of humanism is in the filioque, the heresy which lies at the root of Heterodoxy.
It was and is the filioque, the statement that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son as well as from the Father, that locked up the Holy Spirit between the Father and the Son.
One should also note that not all the Roman Popes had approved of the filioque, and several had considered its introduction into the Symbol of Faith completely uncanonical.
The ancient Orthodox teaching of the personal attributes of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit was distorted in the Latin Church by the creation of a teaching of the procession, outside of time and from all eternity,of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son-- the Filioque.
Suffice it to say that the Filioque at the level of the economy presents no difficulty whatsoever to the Orthodox, but the projection of this into the immanent Trinity creates great difficulties.
Contemporary Orthodox theologians, particularly Karsavin and Lossky,have expressed the opinion that the Filioque dispute is at the very root of ecclesiological differences between East and West.
They would tell us about the filioque, about Papal supremacy and other teachings rejected by Orthodoxy, and also about the teachings of both Latin and Orthodox faiths which are rejected by the Protestants.
In conclusion, the Vatican document on the procession of the Holy Spirit constitutes an encouraging attempt to clarify the basic aspects of the Filioque problem and show that a rapprochement between West and East on this matter is eventually possible.
The arguments raised by Photius-"the Filioque is an illegitimate interpolation,""it destroys the monarchy of the Father," and"relativizes the reality of personal, or hypostatic existence, in the Trinity"- remained at the centre of the discussion.