Примери коришћења Restrictive agreements на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Restrictive agreements and abuse of dominant positions.
The provision of Article 10(3) of the Law stipulates that restrictive agreements are prohibited and void, except in cases of exemption from the prohibition pursuant to this Law.
Restrictive agreements and abuse of dominant positions.
Joint bidding agreements concluded between competitors by their nature restrict, distort or prevent competition, andas such may represent restrictive agreements from Article 10 of the Law.
Restrictive agreements are prohibited and void by the Act, unless exempted from prohibition.
This also represented an opportunity to discuss competition policy topics such as restrictive agreements, abuse of dominance, various cases from the competition area, and sector inquiries related to financial markets.
Restrictive agreements are prohibited and void, except in cases of exemption from the prohibition pursuant to this Law.
Furthermore, the issue of competition protection and maintenance of media pluralism is reduced to the problem of illicit media concentration,absolutely ignoring both restrictive agreements and the abuse of dominant position.
It's been a year since restrictive agreements were criminalized and not one charge has been brought on these grounds.
Conclusion on the termination of the procedure was passed at therequest of the parties, bearing in mind that the parties have made the existence of legal error probable, in terms of the application for an individual exemption from the prohibition of restrictive agreements at the time of conclusion of the Agreement on the consortium.
Pursuant to the identical article, restrictive agreements are prohibited and void, except in cases of exemption from the prohibition in accordance with this Law.
Considering that current competition policy regulations(Law and bylaws) of the Republic of Serbia do not explicitly regulate the situation of entering into agreement on"consortium" owing to joint bid participation,the Commission is left to act in accordance with regulations governing the issue of horizontal restrictive agreements.
Article 10(3) of the Law stipulates that restrictive agreements are prohibited and void, except in cases of exemption from the prohibition pursuant to the Law.
If a market participant assessed that all the conditions are not met, and that agreement is not of minor importance, it would be necessary to applyfor individual exemption from the prohibitio, in accordance with the Regulation on the content of the request for individual exemption from the prohibition of restrictive agreements("Official Gazette of RS", No. 107/2009).
Article 10 of the Law defines restrictive agreements qualifying them as null and void, except in cases of exemption from prohibition as defined by the Law.
The Commission for Protection of Competition has instituted four new in-depth antitrust investigation proceedings against ten undertakings operating on the baby care products market,based on reasonable doubt that the parties have concluded restrictive agreements in order to fix prices of baby care products in further sale(such as pacifiers and dummies, soothers and teethers, baby bottles, milk pumps, baby cosmetics, textile, etc.).
Article 10 of the Law defines restrictive agreements and determines that they are prohibited and void, except in cases of exemption from the prohibition pursuant to the Law.
The provision of Article 10(1) of the Law on Protection of Competition(Official Gazette of the RS 51/2009 and 95/2013- hereinafter, the Law)stipulates the following: Restrictive agreements are agreements between undertakings which as their purpose or effect have a significant restriction, distortion, or prevention of competition in the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Restrictive agreements may be exempted from the prohibition if they fulfil conditions pertaining to the exemption stipulated in Article 11 of the Law, while the period of individual exemption cannot exceed eight years.
This type of behavior of undertakings in public procurements may represent a special form of restrictive agreements from Article 10 of the Law since it may represent a restrictive agreement between undertakings- competitors on the requirements for participation in public procurement procedures.
Restrictive agreements are agreements between undertakings, the object or effect of which is to considerably restrict, distort or prevent competition on the territory of the Republic of Serbia, and in particular those agreements which directly or indirectly set purchase or sale prices or other terms of trade in the resale of products.
While reminding related parties that tacit agreements andexchange of business sensitive information between competing parties operating on the market represent a form of restrictive agreements, the Commission states that in the case of entering into related agreement, such act would in nature represent a horizontal restrictive agreement with all elements of cartel-type agreement, and as such could be qualified as the hardcore competition infringement.
Horizontal restrictive agreements occur between undertakings that operate at the same level of production or distribution chain, or between undertakings that operate on the same relevant market or which may in the short period of time appear on the market.
The Law does not explicitly lists all forms of restrictive agreements, but states individual categories of behaviors that might represent an infringement of competition.
Pursuant to the Law, restrictive agreements may be exempted from the prohibition in one of the three following manners- either as the agreements of minor importance, or within the exemption from prohibition by categories of agreements, or in the proceedings of individual exemption from prohibition at the request of restrictive agreement participant.
Key moments The forms of violations of competition are restrictive agreements, prescribed and defined in Article 10 of the Law, and abuse of dominant position, prescribed and defined by Article 16 of the Law.
The interpretation of the provisions on restrictive agreements Opinion on the compatibility of a standard type model contract in regard to the rules of competition protection At the request of the parties, the Commission does not issue opinion that an action a participant intends to take, or agreement intended to be concluded, is not contrary to Law.
In accordance with Article 10 of the Law on Protection of Competition, restrictive agreements are agreements between undertakings which as their purpose or effect have a significant restriction, distortion or prevention of competition in the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Furthermore, the Competition Protection Law prohibits restrictive agreements that apply uneven business conditions to the same transactions for different market participants,putting these participants- in this case local media content producers- in a less favorable position relative to their competitors. Any restrictive agreements are punishable by a competition protection fine pronounced by the Competition Protection Commission.
Pursuant to Article 10 of the Law on Protection of Competition(hereinafter:the Law), the restrictive agreements are agreements between undertakings which as their purpose or effect have a significant restriction, distortion, or prevention of competition in the territory of the Republic of Serbia.