Примери коришћења Valuation technique на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach include matrix pricing.
However, the fair value hierarchy prioritises the inputs to valuation techniques, not the valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
For example, valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparable.
However, the disclosures in IAS 8 for a change in accounting estimate are not required for revisions resulting from a change in a valuation technique or its application.
The inputs to the valuation technique reasonably represent market expectations and measures of the risk return factors inherent in the asset.
When a price for an identical asset or liability is not observable,an entity measures fair value using another valuation technique that maximises the use of relevant observable inputs and minimises the use of unobservable inputs.
When a valuation technique is used, the assumptions applied in determining fair values of each class of financial assets or financial liabilities.
For all financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value, the entity shall disclose the basis for determining fair value, for example,quoted market price in an active market or a valuation technique.
When a valuation technique is used, the entity shall disclose the assumptions applied in determining fair value for each class of financial assets or financial liabilities.
For assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring ornon-recurring basis in the balance sheet after initial recognition, the valuation techniques and inputs used to develop those.
If multiple valuation techniques are used to measure Fair Value, the results(i.e. respective indications of Fair Value) shall be evaluated considering the reasonableness of the range of values indicated by those results.
To increase consistency and compatibility in fair value measurements andrelated disclosures, IFRS 13 establishes a fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques into 3 levels.
If multiple valuation techniques are used to measure fair value, the results(respective indications of fair value) shall be evaluated and weighted, as appropriate, considering the reasonableness of the range indicated by those results.
This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions include assumptions about risk, for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value(such as a pricing model)and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique.
An entity uses valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
If there has been a significant decrease in the volume or level of activity for the asset or liability,a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate(eg the use of a market approach and a present value technique). .
The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
If there is a principal market for the asset or liability, the fair value measurement shall represent the price in that market(whether that price is directly observable orestimated using another valuation technique), even if the price in a different market is potentially more advantageous at the measurement date.
If there is a valuation technique commonly used by market participants to price the asset and that technique has been demonstrated to provide reliable estimates of prices obtained in actual market transactions, the entity uses that technique. .
That might be the case when using the multiperiod excess earnings method to measure the fair value of an intangible asset because that valuation technique specifically takes into account the contribution of any complementary assets and the associated liabilities in the group in which such an intangible asset would be used.
Where there is a valuation technique commonly used by market participants to price the instrument and that technique has been demonstrated to provide reliable estimates of prices obtained in actual market transactions, that technique is utilised.
If there has been a significant decrease in the volume or level of activity for the asset or liability,an entity shall evaluate whether the quoted prices provided by third parties are developed using current information that reflects orderly transactions or a valuation technique that reflects market participant assumptions(including assumptions about risk).
If there is a valuation technique commonly used by market participants for establishing instrument prices and if such a technique has yielded reliable estimates of prices used in actual market transactions, such a technique is applied by the Group.
When a quoted price for the transfer of an identical or a similar liability or entity's own equity instrument is not available and the identical item is not held by another party as an asset, an entity shall measure the fair value of the liability orequity instrument using a valuation technique from the perspective of a market participant that owes the liability or has issued the claim on equity.
Regardless of the valuation technique used, an entity shall include appropriate risk adjustments, including a risk premium reflecting the amount that market participants would demand as compensation for the uncertainty inherent in the cash flows of an asset or a liability(see paragraph B17).
After initial recognition, when measuring fair value using a valuation technique or techniques that use unobservable inputs,an entity shall ensure that those valuation techniques reflect observable market data(eg the price for a similar asset or liability) at the measurement date.
Valuation techniques include using recent arm's length market transactions between knowledgeable, willing parties, if available, reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models.
If the transaction price is fair value at initial recognition and a valuation technique that uses unobservable inputs will be used to measure fair value in subsequent periods, the valuation technique shall be calibrated so that at initial recognition the result of the valuation technique equals the transaction price.
Calibration ensures that the valuation technique reflects current market conditions, andit helps an entity to determine whether an adjustment to the valuation technique is necessary(eg there might be a characteristic of the asset or liability that is not captured by the valuation technique). .
However, a change in a valuation technique or its application(eg a change in its weighting when multiple valuation techniques are used ora change in an adjustment applied to a valuation technique) is appropriate if the change results in a measurement that is equally or more representative of fair value in the circumstances.