英語 での Disputed domain name の使用例とその 日本語 への翻訳
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The Disputed Domain Name.
Search for decisions involving a specific disputed domain name, woldwide.
The disputed domain name was registered on March 17, 2010.
Further, there is no evidence that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name was registered on December 14, 2007.
The Registrar also confirmed that the registration agreement of the disputed domain name is in English.
The disputed domain name should be turned over to the Complainant.
In addition, the Complainant claims that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
The disputed domain name should be transferred to the Complainants.
Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy,Complainant must prove that the disputed domain name has been registered and used in bad faith.
The disputed domain name should, therefore, be transferred to the Complainant.
It is not clear what such agreed change was, and the email provides no concrete evidence of thealleged business arrangement between the Parties regarding the Disputed Domain Name.
(b) The Respondent acquired the Disputed Domain Name on May 3, 2012, and has been operating the associated website in good faith since that date.
(i) Respond specifically to the statements and allegations contained in the complaint and include any and all bases for the Respondent(domain-name holder)to retain registration and use of the disputed domain name(This portion of the response shall comply with any word or page limit set forth in the Provider's Supplemental Rules.);
The Complainant asserted that the Disputed Domain Name was identical or substantially similar to their registered domain name as well as their registered trademark,"TRANSPLACE",and that the Respondent had registered and used the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith.
To file a complaint on Domain Name to PPNB,a party needs to identify: The disputed Domain Name; Registrant of the Domain Name; Registrar where the Domain Name is registered; and Background of the objection.
The Panel dealt with the requirements as laid in the DNDRP that required the Complainant to prove that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's;and The Respondent registered and/or used the disputed domain name in bad faith.
On March 23rd 2016, Celcom filed a complaint with the Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration andasserted that the disputed domain name as allegedly used unlawfully by OC was identical to that of Celcom's mark and that they have not permitted OC to use the mark which may sufficiently damage the reputation of Celcom's business.
To do so, there were several evidences that needed to be adduced by the Respondent which include: The Respondent had genuinely used or made preparations to use the Disputed Domain Name even before the filing of the complaint; The Respondent is commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name; or The use of the Disputed Domain Name is for legitimate, non-commercial and/or fair purposes and have no intention of using the same for profits or to deceive the public.
Alternative dispute resolutionLimited to trade mark matters involving domain name dispute.
WIPO also provides world class domain name dispute resolution services.
ICANN helped design and implement a low-cost system for resolving disputes over domain name ownership.
In addition, e-Web had previously registered other domain names which entailed a number of domain name dispute resolution proceedings against e-Web.