英語 での Relative error の使用例とその 日本語 への翻訳
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Force relative error.
Relative Error and Ulps.
Numerical results and relative error.
Rate Relative error exists.
Disp. Indicating Relative Error:≤±1%.
Relative error of test force:≤±1%.
If x- y 1 then the relative error is bounded by.
Relative error of indicating value±1%.
The error is 0.5 ulps, the relative error is 0.8.
Relative error of deformation value±1%.
The returned value must have absolute or relative error less than 1E-9.
Thus the relative error is at most 16.
There are three options you can use to express the maximum relative error.
The same relative error occurs in each calculation.
Your answer should be accurate to within an absolute or relative error of $10^{-4}$.
Relative error of indicating value: Within±0.5%.
Answers within an absolute or relative error of $10^{-4}$ will be accepted.
Relative error under rough test: no more than±0.25%.
An R2 score closer to 1 suggests that the relative error is lower than the average line.
Relative error of angle indicating value≤±1%(both forward inversion directions).
In order to avoid such small numbers, the relative error is normally written as a factor times, which in this case is=(/2)-p= 5(10)-3= .005.
Relative error of torque repeatability≤1.0%(both forward inversion directions).
The condition number is definedmore precisely to be the maximum ratio of the relative error in x divided by the relative error in b.
In general, the relative error of the result can be only slightly larger than.
If x and y have no rounding error, then by Theorem 2 if the subtraction is done with a guard digit,the difference x-y has a very small relative error(less than 2).
Relative error of torque indicating value≤±1.0%(both forward and inversion directions).
The last section canbe summarized by saying that without a guard digit, the relative error committed when subtracting two nearby quantities can be very large.
Thus, if x is not so small that 1.0+ x rounds to 1.0 in extended precision but small enough that 1.0+ x rounds to 1.0 in single precision, then the value returned by log1p(x) will be zero instead of x,and the relative error will be one--rather larger than 5.
For FIR differentiators, which have an amplitude characteristic proportional to frequency,these filters minimize the maximum relative error(the maximum of the ratio of the error to the desired amplitude).