영어에서 Christ's teaching 을 사용하는 예와 한국어로 번역
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
-
Computer
By Christ's teaching man is equally protected, nourished, and supplied with drink by others;
And this belief gives me fresh strength to fulfil Christ's teaching, and destroys those hindrances which formerly blocked my path.
Christ's teaching is useless, because, if it were put into practice, our life could not continue;
The learned historians see this, and, as they are under no necessity to hide it as it ishidden by the pseudo-believers, this version of Christ's teaching deprived of all substance is subjected to profound criticism and very rightly repudiated.
According to Christ's teaching, there can be no such things as Christian courts which inflict punishment.
In this way, then, the discussions of my book on the part of Churchmen and freethinking critics alike showed me that the majority of men simply do not understand either Christ's teaching or the questions which Christ's teaching solves.
To them Christ's teaching was new in almost every respect, and it was unrecognized and unacknowledged.
People of the most different views, both those who believe and,what is most surprising, those who are unbelieving liberals, seem to have an agreement to pass them stubbornly in silence, and all that has been done by men to elucidate the true meaning of Christ's teaching remains unknown or forgotten.
Christ's teaching is useless because, if it were carried into practice, life could not go on as at present;
Thus the information I received, after my book came out, went to show that the Christian doctrine, in its direct and simple sense, was understood, and had always been understood, by a minority of men, while the critics, ecclesiastical and freethinking alike,denied the possibility of taking Christ's teaching in its direct sense.
Much of Christ's teaching the disciples did not at first understand, and often His lessons seemed to be almost forgotten.
The third argument is that although one ought not to defend oneself,one ought to defend one's neighbors; this still contradicts Christ's teaching, because Jesus did not allow his disciples to defend him and because the violence used to defend against threatened violence may be even worse since we never know what will result beforehand.
Christ's teaching has a profound metaphysical meaning, it has an all-human meaning, and it has the simplest, clearest, and most practical meaning for the life of every single man.
The arguments of all the freethinking critics, Russian and foreign alike, different as they may be in tone and manner of presentation,all amount essentially to the same strange misapprehension--namely, that Christ's teaching, one of the consequences of which is non-resistance to evil, is of no use to us because it requires a change of our life.
In affirming my belief in Christ's teaching, I could not help explaining why I do not believe, and consider as mistaken, the Church's doctrine, which is usually called Christianity.
The discussions of all the lay writers, both Russian and foreign, no matter how different their tone and the manner of their arguments may be,in reality reduce themselves to one and the same strange misunderstanding, namely, that Christ's teaching, one of the consequences of which is non-resistance to evil, is useless to us, because it demands that our life be changed.
Christ's teaching is useless because, if it were carried into practice, life could not go on as at present; we must add: if we have begun by living sinfully, as we do live and are accustomed to live.
Lowing the principle is the result of men of the state conception of life unconsciously taking that conception as the standard by which the Christian religion directs men, and taking the Christian principle of perfection as the rule by which that lifeis to be ordered; they think and say that to follow Christ's teaching is impossible, because the complete fulfillment of all that is required by this teaching would put an end to life.
This still contradicts Christ's teaching, because Jesus did not allow his disciples to defend him and because the violence used to defend against threatened violence may be even worse since we never know what will result beforehand.
These false interpreters do not admit any understanding of the teaching of Jesus which does not conform to the previous and subsequent revelations;so that their aim is not to explain the meaning of Christ's teaching, but as far as possible to harmonize various extremely contradictory writings, such as the Pentateuch, the Psalms, the Gospels, the Epistles, and the Acts-that is, all that is supposed to constitute the Holy Scriptures.
We are so accustomed to this that Christ's teaching, that a man's happiness cannot depend on his power or his estate and that a rich man cannot be happy, seems to us like a demand to make a sacrifice for the sake of future bliss.
Christ's teaching is useless, because, if it were put into practice, our life could not continue; in other words-if we began to live well, as Christ has taught us, we could not continue to live badly, as we live and are accustomed to live.
It turns out that everything which has been done by the men who comprehended Christ's teaching in a direct manner and lived in conformity with such a comprehension, everything which all true Christians, all Christian champions, have done, everything which now transforms the world under the guise of socialism and communism- is exaggeration, of which it is not worth while to speak.
While Christ's teaching is not only a doctrine that gives rules that a man must follow, it unfolds a new meaning in life, and defines a whole world of human activity quite different from all that has preceded it and appropriate to the period on which man is entering.
It would seem as though before judging Christ's teaching one should understand what it consists of, and to decide whether his teaching is reasonable or not one should first of all admit that he said what he said;
By Christ's teaching man is equally protected, nourished, and supplied with drink by others; but in order that others should continue to guard, to feed, and to give him drink, he does not bring force to bear on anyone, but tries himself to serve others and to be useful to all men as he can, and thereby he becomes necessary to all.
As I said when I published my book, Christ's teaching and his very words about non-resistance to evil were for many years a subject for ridicule and low jesting in my eyes, and Churchmen, far from opposing it, even encouraged this scoffing at sacred things.
We know very well that Christ's teaching always included and includes the denial of all those human illusions, those'vain things,' empty idols, which we, by calling them Church, State, culture, science, art, and civilization, think we can separate from the ranks of delusions.
It would seem as though before judging Christ's teaching one should understand what it consists of, and to decide whether his teaching is reasonable or not one should first of all admit that he said what he said; but that is just what is not done either by the Church or by the free-thinking expositors.
It seems that all that has been done by those men who understood Christ's teaching literally and lived in accordance with such an understanding of it, all that has been said and done by all true Christians, by all the Christian saints, all that is now reforming the world in the shape of socialism and communism- is simply exaggeration, not worth talking about.