Ví dụ về việc sử dụng Force or coercion trong Tiếng anh và bản dịch của chúng sang Tiếng việt
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Japan's position is that we willnever tolerate the change of status quo by force or coercion.
To prevent use of force or coercion to resolve claims either to territory or to maritime rights.
Soft power is the ability to persuade others to do what you want,without having to use force or coercion.
To prevent use of force or coercion to resolve claims either to territory or to maritime rights.
We don't take sides butwe strongly oppose actions that aim to advance a claim by force or coercion," Blinken said.
Through an interpreter, he reiterated their pitch for avoiding“force or coercion” in staking claims and not doing anything unilaterally that would upset the status quo.
CAMBRIDGE- China has been making major efforts toincrease its ability to influence other countries without force or coercion.
He insisted that Japan always respected the law,opposed the use of force or coercion in the settlement of maritime disputes.
The United States opposes unilateral actions by any party aimed at altering the status quo,including any resort to force or coercion.
We should reaffirm the very principal that any unilateral action by force or coercion to change the status quo is unacceptable.".
Soft power is the ability of a country to shape other countries' views, attitudes,perceptions and actions without force or coercion.
Rules such as those calling for settling disputes peacefully andnot using force or coercion to alter the status quo ultimately benefit all, including China.
One criterion by which regional states have tried to distinguish acceptable from unacceptable statusquo changes is the use of“force or coercion.”.
Keiichi Hayashi, Tokyo's ambassador to London,has accused China of repeated attempts“to change the status quo by force or coercion” and claimed that one recent incident involving a Chinese destroyer in the East China Sea“might be regarded as an act of war”.
The United States has also been too timid at times toensure that unilateral changes to the status quo through force or coercion are met with costs.
The defense ministers of Australia, Japan, and the United States issued a joint statement on June 3,2018,conveying their governments'“strong opposition to the use of force or coercion as well as unilateral action to alter the status quo, and to the use of disputed features for military purposes in the South China Sea.”.
In particular, all countries should agree to state or clarify their territorial or maritime claims on the basis of international law and to settle any dispute by peaceful means-never through force or coercion.
The defense ministers of Australia, Japan, and the United States issued a joint statement on June 3, 2018,conveying their governments'“strong opposition to the use of force or coercion as well as unilateral action to alter the status quo, and to the use of disputed features for military purposes in the South China Sea.”.
In particular, all countries should agree to state or clarify their territorial or maritime claims on the basis of international law, and to settle any dispute by peaceful means-never through force or coercion.
The two sides also affirmed full support for the peaceful resolution of disputes without the threat or use of force or coercion, in accordance with international law….
In particular, all countries should agree to state or clarify their territorial or maritime claims on the basis of international law, and to settle any dispute by peaceful means-never through force or coercion.
So to reiterate this, it means making claims that are faithful in light of international law,not resorting to force or coercion, and resolving all disputes through peaceful means.
The U.S. position on the East and South China Sea disputes, as Defense Secretary Ash Carter and other officials have frequently reiterated in recent months,is that it opposes changes to the status quo made through force or coercion.
The United States opposes unilateral actions by any party that are aimed at altering the status quo,including anything related to force or coercion," State Department spokesman Robert Palladino told reporters.
As China has struggled to expand its maritime boundaries, assert sovereignty over disputed islands and vast maritime resources, and enhance its naval capabilities to counter U.S. Navy dominance in the Pacific,it has never been reluctant to use force or coercion.
We have agreed that in the pursuit of the solution to the conflict in the maritime area, it is important to base ourselves on the rule of law and resort to peaceful means andnot the use of force or coercion," Kishida said, referring to the UN-backed tribunal's finding published in July.
For example, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal during the Vietnam-China oil rig crisis in May 2014, Prime Minister Abe stated that“Japan's position is that we willnever tolerate the change of status quo by force or coercion.
French President Francois Hollande, just over two months ago, met with his Philippines counterpart andstressed that France would not back the use of force or coercion in the South China Sea.
On maritime security, Abe and Sanchez emphasised the importance of international order based on the rule of law and expressed their"serious concern over and strong opposition to any unilateral actions that increase tensions or change the status quo by use of force or coercion," alluding to China's maritime assertiveness.
The United States is required to adopt stronger policies in the South China Sea disputes, whose objectives aim to:(i) force China to settle disputes peacefully in accordance with international laws and encouraging other countries to do the same; and(ii)deter China from using military force or coercion to settle the disputes.