Ví dụ về việc sử dụng Piketty trong Tiếng anh và bản dịch của chúng sang Tiếng việt
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Thomas Piketty correctly warned that extreme inequality would threaten the democratic order.
We account for inequality in labor earnings and wealth, as Thomas Piketty and many others do.
As Thomas Piketty suggests, income inequality declined dramatically in many Western countries and in eastern Europe throughout most of the 20th century.
Political action has curbed dangerous inequalities in the past, Piketty says and may do so again.
So why is Piketty, who is best known in France as adviser to the Socialist Party, hailed as the Messiah in the United States(where he once taught, at MIT).?
Mọi người cũng dịch
Unless we can reverse theinequality trends of the past 35 years, Piketty says, the ensuing social chaos will eventually destroy democracy.
While we're working on mobilizing to take back our democracy,we can start from the bottom up to“democratize wealth,” as both Piketty and Alperovitz say we must.
SINCE its publication last year, Thomas Piketty's“Capital in the Twenty-First Century” has ignited a furious debate about inequality in the rich world.
Phang Sock-Yong of the Singapore Management University says that, as far as housing is concerned,Singapore approximates the“ideal society” envisioned by Thomas Piketty in his book,“Capital in the 21st Century”.
As Piketty warns, the United States, like other rich nations, could be moving toward an oligarchy of inherited wealth and away from a meritocracy based on labor income.
Prompted in many ways by the pioneering efforts of Thomas Piketty and his collaborators, the study of top incomes has made remarkable progress in the past decade.
As Thomas Piketty argues in Capital in the Twenty-First Century, free markets have not only enlarged the gap between rich and poor, but have also reduced average incomes across the developed and developing worlds.
Occupy Wall Street has brought the 1% to the attention of the wider public,but it was Atkinson, Piketty and Saez who brought it to the attention of the academic community over the last decade.
Based on the work of Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, if you look from the 1950s up to the end of the 1970s, the share of total national income in the US earned by the richest 1% was about 10%.
Several studies demonstrated that the probability of not achieving a rise in the CD4-cell count increases with patient age and with progressive decrease in thymus size as detected by computed tomography(Goetz 2001,Marimoutou 2001, Piketty 2001, Teixera 2001, Viard 2001, Wolbers 2007).
In Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Thomas Piketty seeks to analyse a unique collection of data from twenty countries, ranging as far back as the eighteenth century, to uncover key economic and social patterns.
In reality, however, Capital in the Twenty-First Century makes it clear that public policy can make an enormous difference, that even ifthe underlying economic conditions point toward extreme inequality, what Piketty calls“a drift toward oligarchy” can be halted and even reversed if the body politic so chooses.
As documented by the economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, the richest 0.1% of U.S. households collected a record 12.3% of all U.S. income in 2007, surpassing their 11.5% share in 1928, on the eve of the Great Depression.
In fact, the difference between what the US“should” be paying if the Piketty calculation was right is about $710 billion in annual income, or $17.7 trillion in capital- the equivalent of its yearly GDP.
Piketty shows, with startling statistics dating back over two centuries, as well as historical and literary anecdotes, that owners of capital always manage-- except in the case of war-- to get richer faster than workers and entrepreneurs.
No wonder the most successful economics book of recent years,Thomas Piketty's“Capital in the Twenty-First Century”, echoes the title of Marx's most important work and his preoccupation with inequality….
Moreover, Piketty seems unwilling to concede that income alone, however calculated, does not account for the total social reality: we all benefit from progress in multiple areas- health, transportation, consumer technologies- regardless of income.
Based on extensive data from 20 countries andcovering the period since the industrial revolution, Piketty argues that invested capital(i.e. capital invested in the stock market, property etc.) will grow faster than income: capital has become a substitute for labour in generating wealth.
Just as Thomas Piketty offered a sweeping critique and progressive reassessment of capitalism, former World Bank Group chief financial officer Bertrand Badré looks at the destructive role finance played in the global economic crisis of 2007-2008 and offers a bold prescription for making finance a force for good.
US populists, perhaps inspired by the writings of Thomas Piketty, seem unimpressed by the fact that globalization has lifted hundreds of millions of desperately poor people in China and India into the global middle class.
He collaborates with Thomas Piketty, author of the bestseller“Capital in the Twenty-First Century,” and University of California at Berkeley professor Emmanuel Saez in trying to come up with more accurate tax-record figures.
Back in 2001 two French economists, Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, circulated a seminal research paper(formally published two years later) titled“Income inequality in the United States, 1913- 1998.”….
In the US, recent research by economist Thomas Piketty shows that over the last 30 years the growth in the incomes of the bottom 50 percent has been zero, whereas incomes of the top 1 percent have grown by 300 percent.
One of the most striking points Piketty makes is that, as he puts it,“in all known societies in all times, the least wealthy half of the population has owned virtually nothing,” and the top ten per cent has owned“most of what there is to own.”.
In Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Thomas Piketty of the Paris School of Economics asserts that inequality is the inevitable consequence of economic growth in a capitalist economy and the resulting concentration of wealth can destabilize democratic societies and undermine the ideals of social justice upon which they are built.