Esimerkkejä Does not prevent member states käytöstä Englanti ja niiden käännökset Suomi
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Therefore, Community legislation does not prevent Member States from establishing their own approaches.
This has been adopted by the common position,which also states that the designation of a single contact point does not prevent Member States from setting up several offices.
The proposed regulation does not prevent Member States from collecting other or more detailed statistics if they wish.
This is all the more necessary given that the EU competence does not prevent Member States from exercising their own.
The Directive does not prevent Member States from investigating individual cases where there is a well-founded suspicion of abuse.
Having already achieved the employment targets- orbeing close to them- does not prevent Member States from intensifying their efforts to further raise employment levels.
This does not prevent Member States from extending collective responsibility for board members directly to shareholders and other stakeholders.
The fact that a minimum rate of 20% is set does not prevent Member States from applying a higher rate if they so wish.
It does not prevent Member States from applying regulatory charges on urban roads specifically designed to reduce traffic congestion or combat environmental impacts in built up areas.
It should be specified that the establishment of minimum standards does not prevent Member States from making provision for more favourable arrangements for legal aid applicants.
Article 8 does not prevent Member States from granting hauliers established in another Member State additional access to their domestic road haulage markets in accordance with their national legislation.
The Council and Commission note that the wording of Article 83 does not prevent Member States from introducing or retaining national provisions for supply at no cost to patients”.
However, if the results achieved are not satisfactory by the end of 2013,the Commission will assess whether to further review the Directive on charging heavy goods vehicles so that it does not prevent Member States from including a CO2 charging element in tolls.
Consequently, this legislative document does not prevent Member States from adopting shorter payment periods or harsher penalties.
Because you know this, Mr Lehne: in your own Amendment No 80 on students and other applications for purposes of taking up employment, you have very nicely written that this chapter,as strict as you would like it to be in your recommendation, does not prevent Member States from having rules which are more favourable to applicants.
Directive 2001/83/EC does not prevent Member States from establishing their own approaches regarding the provisions on information on medicinal products.
Our approach is to guarantee minimum common levels of law enforcement at European level, which does not prevent Member States introducing more stringent or national legislation.
Therefore, Union legislation does not prevent Member States from establishing their own approaches to the provision of information on medicines, provided that the above-mentioned rules on advertising are complied with.
The proposal does not contain rules on institutional structures of the ports and does not prevent Member States from deciding which bodies should act as competent authorities.
Therefore, Community legislation does not prevent Member States from establishing their own approaches regarding the provision of information on medicinal products as long as the above mentioned rules on advertising are respected.
It does not lay down institutional structures for managing public transport, and does not prevent Member States from deciding which bodies should act as competent authorities.
Finally, Community law does not prevent Member States, in certain circumstances, from treating concealment of the existence of an intraCommunity transaction as an attempt to evade VAT and from imposing penalties prescribed by domestic law.
The common position clarifies in Recital 52 that the obligation to provide for procedures by electronic means does not prevent Member States from offering other means, in addition to electronic ones, to complete procedures and formalities.
As regards this Directive, apart from the control mechanism, as some of the provisions introduced by this Directive may interfere with national constitutional rules relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression in the media,the Commission introduces recital 16 clarifying that this Directive does not prevent Member States from applying these constitutional rules.
The proposal lays down common conditions but does not prevent Member States from adding their own conditions concerning admission to the occupation;
However, the Commission deems it fit to clarify on the basis of amendment 32(Recital 26), which draws on the work of the Council,that the obligation to provide for procedures by electronic means does not prevent Member States from offering other means, in addition to electronic ones, to complete procedures and formalities.
This Directive does not regulate AIF and therefore does not prevent Member States from adopting or from continuing to apply additional requirements in respect of AIF established on their territory.
In accordance with Article 193 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union(TFEU), this Directive does not prevent Member States from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures, for example for the purposes to comply with environmental quality standards.
The Advocate General considers that the directive does not prevent Member States from granting libraries the right to digitise the books from their collections, if their being made available to the public by dedicated terminals requires it.
As far as amendment 120 is concerned, acceptance is coupled by the insertion of a new Recital(27g):this aims to clarify that the requirement of non-duplication does not prevent Member States from applying their own conditions but merely require them to take into account equivalent conditions already satisfied by the provider in another Member States. .