Esimerkkejä Liability regime käytöstä Englanti ja niiden käännökset Suomi
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Payment blocking and liability regimes for ISPs.
The liability regime is currently governed by international conventions.
Compulsory insurance requirements must therefore form an integral part of any passenger liability regime.
What is the liability regime applicable in case of legal action?
Given this background, the Commission will maintain a balanced and predictable liability regime for online platforms.
Ensure that liability regimes promote rail, waterborne and intermodal transport.
The Commission considers that suppressing this part of the liability regime is unacceptable since this would weaken the proposal.
Current liability regimes are insufficient to remedy the problems found by the review.
However, because of international legal constraints, this international liability regime cannot be modified by means of EU-legislation.
Current liability regimes are insufficient to remedy the problems identified in the Commission's review.
At least the sixfeatures outlined below should, in the view of the Commission, form part of an EU-wide maritime passenger liability regime.
The existing maritime liability regime has developed over centuries and is consequently a complex one.
In order to ensure adequate protection of passengers, certain key principles have to be incorporated in a Community maritime passenger liability regime.
Liability regime(Article 15(2)): according to the Statutes and/or first sentence of Article 152.
Regulation establishing a Third Party Liability regime for the EU Global Navigation Satellite Systems.
Liability regimes: collaborative platforms can be exempted from liability for information they store on behalf of those offering a service.
The form of the Commission's proposal to achieve a maritime passenger liability regime that meets the elements outlined above is not yet certain.
Very different liability regimes with regard to transport operations result in unnecessarily high insurance premiums.
Similarly, coverage of all carriers, irrespective of the flag of the vessel, is crucial if the maritime passenger liability regime is to be effective.
The Commission considers that such a liability regime for carriers of passengers by sea should be put in place within the Community as soon as possible.
The Commission urges the Member States to do their utmost to support any effort to improve the existing oil pollution liability regime at an international level.
A uniform and adequate passenger liability regime should therefore form an integral part of the Community legal framework for passenger ships.
Secondly, due to the fact that oil activities come under various regulatory fields, any proposals planned by the Commission will have to cover these various fields: firstly- since prevention is better than cure- we will have to improve the safety standards applicable to all European waters, butwe will also have to tighten up the liability regime, strengthen regulatory oversight and step up international cooperation, for example, with our OPEC partners, as we already did in June.
As liability regimes differ widely between Member States, it is difficult and burdensome for the sponsor of a multinational trial to obtain insurance in accordance with those national laws.
It is fully compliant with human rights and does not alter the liability regime for service providers established under the Directive on electronic commerce.
A Community liability regime for passengers carried by sea that meets all the criteria outlined above would satisfy the present day needs of passengers on board ferries and cruise ships and would create a uniform liability regime within the Member States.
Based on these initial reflections, the Commission sees scope for improving the legal framework at EU and national level in the following areas: 1 improving technical measures for safety, and improving the necessary oversight to ensure full implementation, 2 improving the governance as well as the legal framework of nuclear safety, 3 improving emergency preparedness and response,4 reinforcing the EU nuclear liability regime and 5 enhancing scientific and technological competence.
It is true that in the EU there are currently liability regimes for failure to comply with environmental legislation, incurring purely monetary penalties, and that Member States can broaden the system to impose other types of penalty.
The main features of the liability regime itself have not been significantly altered except on one point, which is the very broad discretion that is now available to Member States when deciding to remedy or otherwise environmental damage for which no solvent polluter can be held liable.
In the light of all the foregoing considerations, it must be concluded that, as Community law currently stands, no liability regime exists under which the Community can incur liability for conduct falling within the sphere of its legislative competence in a situation where any failure of such conduct to comply with the WTO agreements cannot be relied upon before the Community courts.