Eksempler på brug af Compensation per employee på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Compensation per Employee in ECU by Sector in the Member States.
At the same time, the increase in compensation per employee decelerated from 12.2% in 1995 to 4.8% in 1999.
Compensation per Employee in Manufacturing Sectors in the Five Largest Member States.
Notwithstanding a tightening of labour market conditions, growth in compensation per employee was moderate in 1994-96.
Growth in compensation per employee has increased considerably in recent years.
Changes in unit labour costs are determined by labour productivity growth andby changes in nominal compensation per employee.
Definition: Compensation per employee deflated by the price index of private consumption.
It has a significantly higher level of income per head of popula tion relative to its average compensation per employee- which was considerably below the Community average in 1988.
Growth in compensation per employee is expected to remain low, dampened by the continued weakness of the labour market.
Turning to domestic price pressures, the growth of compensation per employee is estimated to have risen significantly in 2008.
Compensation per employee growth rose to double-digit figures in 2000 and 2001, before declining to 7.7% in 2004 2.
Regarding domestic price pressures,the growth rate of compensation per employee is expected to slow in 2012, as deteriorating labour market conditions exert downward pressure.
Compensation per employee has been growing at relatively high rates, although decelerating since 2000, while growth in unit labour costs has gradually declined since 2001.
Taking into account current wage settlements and the modest improvement in labour market conditions,the growth in nominal compensation per employee is assumed to remain broadly unchanged over the horizon. The.
The growth in nominal compensation per employee is assumed to remain moderate over the horizon.
In manufacturing, productivity gains were particularly pronounced in 1983(7,6%) associated with the recovery in manufacturing activity, while the growth in compensation per employee was somewhat faster than for the total economy.
Second, the growth in nominal compensation per employee is assumed to remain moderate over the horizon.
This projection not only takes into account current wage settlements and the projected, only modest,improvement in labour market conditions, but also embodies the assumption of no second-round effects of past price rises on nominal compensation per employee.
Thereafter, the annual growth rate of compensation per employee is projected to pick up gradually, supported by the strengthening in economic activity.
The growth of compensation per employee, which registered a strong increase in 2008, is expected to decline significantly in 2009 and to recover slowly thereafter, with contained wage growth in both the public and ECB ECB staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area September 2009.
This is consistent with the evidence that the overall Community indices for compensation per employee in manufacturing and in the total economy(see Table 3, last four rows) has not differed substantially over time.
In particular, compensation per employee, which registered a strong increase in 2008, is expected to decelerate significantly, with lower wage growth in both the public and private sectors as the labour market deteriorates and inflation falls.
In the period 1978-83 the average increase in compensation per employee in manufacturing was under 5%, by far the lowest increase in any of the countries covered.
Looking forward, compensation per employee is expected to grow somewhat less strongly over the period 2009-10, in the context of weak labour markets with heightened international competition.
Statistics on unit labour costs( calculated as the ratio of compensation per employee to GDP at constant prices per person employed) are derived from data provided under the ESA 95 transmission programme.
As the rise in compensation per employee in 1982 and 1983 has been only slightly faster than the increase in the GDP deflator, the rise in the real product wage(compensation of employees deflated by the GDP deflator) has been substan tially more moderate than earlier.
Third, the assumptions for growth in nominal compensation per employee over the horizon have been revised slightly downwards compared with the December 2003 projections.
As seen from Table 3.6, compensation per employee' rose, on average, for EC 10 in 1982 by 9.4%, or slightly less than the annual average growth rate over the period from 1960 to 1973.
Against this background, growth in compensation per employee declined in the mid-1990s, which helped to subdue increases in unit labour costs.
Against this background,growth in compensation per employee has been restrained, and the increase in nominal unit labour costs has been subdued since 1994.