Eksempler på brug af Increase in quotas på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
They are all of the opinion that we need to stop the increase in quotas.
A linear increase in quotas alone will not, however, create the soft landing you promise.
This is not directed against Elisabeth Jeggle, but against the increase in quotas.
Further increase in quotas(+ 3%) and lowering ofintervention prices- 15%butter and- 5% SMP.
Question No 48 by Mr Duarte Céndan(H-0326/94) Subject: Increase in quotas for Japanese car imports to Europe.
I also believe that it is necessary, as seven Member States are requesting,to look at temporarily suspending the increase in quotas.
(SV) I am voting against this report because I think that an increase in quotas should have been allocated to producers of organic milk.
On the other hand, I do not see the quota arrangement continuing,unless we accept a certain increase in quotas.
On the other hand a 2% increase in quotas does not necessarily imply the same increase in milk production in all regions.
I do appreciate the psychological aspect of this, buton the other hand the increase in quotas for these three countries was decided upon in 1992.
A 50% increase in quotas(Seventh Review), the effect of which will be to raise the total amount of quotas from 39 000 million SDRs to just under 60 000 million SDRs;
You have to be clear on one point:every percentage point increase in quotas requires an 8% reduction in price and an additional budget of around EUR 1 billion.
There are widely differing opinions and all positions, from the general andfundamental rejection of any increase in quotas up to and including a 5% increase, .
Some are fully able to accept an increase in quotas of 2% or more and therefore a soft landing prior to the total abolition of quotas. .
As regards the provisions on guaranteed quantities, we support the Commission's proposal to extend the quota until 2006 and, rather more reluctantly,the proposed 2% increase in quotas.
The decision by Mrs Boel, Commissioner for Agriculture, to maintain the increase in quotas and the Council's wish to dismantle them by 2015 are a provocation to milk producers.
The member countries of the International Monetary Fund, meeting in Toronto from 3 to 8 September, examined three problems in particular: the world economic andfinancial situation, the increase in quotas, and Special Drawing Rights.
That is what we see now,due to the fact that an increase in quotas is a possibility for Member States or for farmers to produce but it is certainly not an obligation.
Our farmers are fighting against the policy of quotas which limits dynamic arable farming, even of products in which the European Union and Greece are nowhere near self-sufficient, such as oil, tobacco and cotton,for which the Council even ignored a resolution by the European Parliament calling for a 50% increase in quotas.
I would like to point out that in the long term this amendment would not lead to an increase in quotas, and I ask that it be approved for the sake of European solidarity.
We fear that this 2% increase in quotas for Member States, albeit optional, will allow the large countries and their large producers to increase their production, leading to a fall in prices for producers and thus resulting in a dumping situation, which may serve as a pretext for easier justification of its subsequent dismantling.
On the issue of milk quotas, we voted for greater flexibility anda higher percentage increase in quotas, giving farmers the opportunity to produce milk should they wish.
In addition, instead of proposing a substantial increase in quotas, the Commission is proposing to replace them with a system of thresholds so that, with subsidies rendered worthless by joint liability fines, farmers will be lured into producing quantities in excess of the thresholds, which the trade and industry will take as and when they please.
My Eastern European colleagues and I on the Committee on Agriculture andRural Development warned on several occasions that we needed a much greater increase in quotas, or their total removal, because our countries, being new to the European Union's systems, were the first to feel the impact of the crisis.
The Commission's proposal for a'soft landing' policy and a 2% increase in quotas every year until 2014, when the current regulation expires, amounts to an intensification of the unequal distribution of quotas between Member States. The proposal would slowly kill off small and medium-sized livestock enterprises, which are struggling to survive, particularly as a result of the steep increases in feed prices.
The Commission deliberately and wittingly overlooks these consequences and does not even brook the idea of repeating intervention so as to secure a minimum wage for olive producers.It has not proposed any increase in quotas so as to at least cover existing production, preferring instead to focus on the quality of olive oil, as if the healthiest and most suitable product for consumers' health has been totally unsuitable in the past.
It would be very simple to freeze the 1% increase in quotas, or to reduce the quotas immediately by 3 to 5%, because we urgently need to come up with some short-term solutions.
Based on the rulings of 2003, there will be a 0.5% increase in quotas for 11 Member States anyway on 1 April this year- the equivalent of 700 000 tonnes more milk in the European Union.
What is wrong with providing for a 2% increase in quota and trusting farmers who can produce for the market-place to do that?