Kaj je THE SURRENDER PROCEDURES BETWEEN MEMBER STATES v Slovenščini - Slovenski prevod

• postopkih predaje med državami članicami

Primeri uporabe The surrender procedures between member states v Angleški in njihovi prevodi v Slovenski

On the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
O evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami;

The Commission adopted on 11 July 2007 the second report on the implementation of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Komisija je 11. julija 2007 sprejela drugo poročilo o izvajanju Okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami.

Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States- Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the framework decision.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami- Izjave nekaterih držav članic k sprejetju okvirnega sklepa POVZETEK.

European Union- Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters- Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Evropska unija- Policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah- Okvirni sklep o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami.

Article 31 of Framework Decision 2002/584 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States must be interpreted as referring only to the situation in which the European arrest warrant system is applicable, which is not the case where.
Člen 31 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami je treba razlagati tako, da se nana�a le na primer, v katerem se uporablja sistem evropskega naloga za prijetje, to pa ni tako, kadar se zahteva za.

On 24 January the Commission presented a report on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States 1.
Komisija je 24. januarja predložila poročilo o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(1).

The purpose of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States is to introduce a simplified system for the surrender, as between judicial authorities, of convicted persons or suspects for the purpose of enforcing judgments or conducting criminal proceedings.
Okvirni sklep o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami ima namen vzpostaviti poenostavljen sistem predaje obsojenih ali osumljenih oseb med pravosodnimi organi zaradi izvršitve kazni ali kazenskega pregona.

Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/584/JHA z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami.

The Framework Decision adopted by the Council on 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States(hereinafter called“the Framework Decision”) set up a new instrument for surrendering wanted persons, thereby breaking with the traditional extradition procedure..
Svet je 13. junija 2002 sprejel Okvirni sklep o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(v nadaljevanju„Okvirni sklep“), s katerim je uvedel novo orodje za predajo zahtevanih oseb, ki se razlikuje od tradicionalnega postopka izročitve.

Council Framework Decision of 13 of June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(2).

Article 6(1) of the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, should be interpreted as meaning that the term‘issuing judicial authority' does not include the institution of the Public Prosecutor's Office.
Člen 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(2002/584/PNZ), kakor je bil spremenjen z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2009/299/PNZ z dne 26. februarja 2009, je treba razlagati tako, da pojem„odreditveni pravosodni organ“ ne vključuje državnega tožilstva.

Report on the implementation of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States(2005).
Poročilo o izvajanju Okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(2005).

Article 8(1)(c) of the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, is to be interpreted as meaning that the term‘arrest warrant', as used in that provision, must be understood as referring to a national arrest warrant that is distinct from the European arrest warrant.
Člen 6, točka 1, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami, kakor je bil spremenjen z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2009/299/PNZ z dne 26. februarja 2009, je treba razlagati tako, da pojem„odreditveni pravosodni organ“ ne vključuje institucije državnega tožilstva.

As a priority, existing measures must be swiftly implemented, in particular the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Kot prvo je potrebno hitro izvajanje obstoječih ukrepov, še posebej evropske sodne naloge za prijetje in postopke predaje med državami članicami.

(Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters- Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA- Articles 31 and 32- European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States- Possibility for the State executing an extradition request to apply a convention adopted before 1 January 2004 but applicable in that State from a later date).
Policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah- Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ- Člena 31 in 32- Evropski nalog za prijetje in postopki predaje med državami članicami- Možnost, da država, ki izvr�uje zahtevo za izročitev, uporabi konvencijo, sprejeto pred 1. januarjem 2004, ki pa se v tej državi uporablja od poznej�ega datuma“.

Reference for a preliminary ruling- Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart- Interpretation of Article 3(2) of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ 2002 L 190, p.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe- Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart- Razlaga člena 3, točka 2, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami UL L 190, str.

Articles 15(1) and 17 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that the executing judicial authority remains required to adopt the decision on the execution of the European arrest warrant after expiry of the time-limits stipulated in Article 17.
Člen 6, točka 1, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami, kakor je bil spremenjen z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2009/299/PNZ z dne 26. februarja 2009, je treba razlagati tako, da pojem„odreditveni pravosodni organ“ ne vključuje institucije državnega tožilstva.

It considers that the application by the French Republic of that convention could be contrary to the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States 6(‘the Framework Decision').
Da če bi Francoska republika uporabila to konvencijo, bi to lahko bilo v nasprotju z Okvirnim sklepom o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami 6(v nadaljevanju: Okvirni sklep).

Are Articles 5 and 6(1) of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States(2002/584/JHA) to be interpreted as meaning that the issuing judicial authority is also entitled to give assurances that detention conditions are compliant, or do assurances in this regard remain subject to the domestic rules of competence in the issuing Member State?”?
Ali je treba člena 5 in 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(2002/584/PNZ) razlagati tako, da ima odreditveni pravosodni organ tudi pooblastilo za zagotovitev spoštovanja pogojev pridržanja, ali pa se glede tega ohrani nacionalna ureditev pristojnosti odreditvene države članice?.

This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 4(6) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ 2002 L 190, p.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na razlago člena 4, točka 6, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami UL L 190, str.

Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, thereby enhancing the procedural rights of persons and fostering the application of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial OJ 2002 L 190, p.
Okvirni sklep Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(2002/584/PNZ), kakor je bil spremenjen z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2009/299/PNZ z dne 26. februarja 2009 zaradi krepitve procesnih pravic oseb ter spodbujanja uporabe načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb, izdanih na sojenju v odsotnosti zadevne osebe UL, posebna izdaja v slovenščini, poglavje 19, zvezek 6, str.

Is that additional penalty one of the factors which must be mentioned in a European arrest warrant pursuant to Article 8 of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States,(2) and if so, which consequences ensue from the failure to mention it?
Ali je ta stranska kazen med podatki, ki morajo biti navedeni v evropskem nalogu za prijetje na podlagi člena 8 Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami(2), ter če je, kakšne so posledice opustitve te navedbe?

Article 31 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States must be interpreted as referring only to the situation in which the European arrest warrant system is applicable, which is not the case where a request for extradition relates to acts committed before a date specified by a Member State in a statement made pursuant to Article 32 of that Framework Decision.
Člen 31 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami je treba razlagati tako, da se nanaša le na primer, v katerem se uporablja sistem evropskega naloga za prijetje, to pa ni tako, kadar se zahteva za izročitev nanaša na dejstva, storjena pred datumom, ki ga je država članica navedla v izjavi, podani v skladu s členom 32 Okvirnega sklepa.

The Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States is valid.
Okvirni sklep o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami je veljaven.

Article 32 of Framework Decision 2002/584 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States must be interpreted as not precluding the application by an executing Member State of the Convention relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union drawn up by Council Act of 27 September 1996 and signed on that date by all the Member States, even where that convention became applicable in that Member State only after 1 January 2004.
Člen 32 Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami je treba razlagati tako, da v izvr�itveni državi članici ne nasprotuje uporabi Konvencije o izročitvi med državami članicami Evropske unije, pripravljene z aktom Sveta z dne 27. septembra 1996, ki so jo istega dne podpisale vse države članice, tudi če se je ta v tej državi članici začela uporabljati �ele po 1. januarju 2004.

Seven years after the entry into force(on 1 January 2004) of the Council framework decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant(EAW) and the surrender procedures between Member States, the Commission has published some statistical data collected in the Member States between 2005 and 2009.
(IT) Komisija je sedem let po začetku veljavnosti(od 1. januarja 2004) Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami objavila nekaj podatkov, ki jih je med letoma 2005 in 2009 zbrala v državah članicah..

Case C-296/08 PPU: Extradition proceedings against Ignacio Pedro Santesteban Goicoechea(Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters- Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA- Articles 31 and 32- European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States- Possibility for the State executing an extradition request to apply a convention adopted before 1 January 2004 but applicable in that State from a later date)(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Chambre de l'instruction of the Cour d'appel de Montpellier).
Zadeva C-296/08 PPU: Postopek izročitve proti Ignaciu Pedru Santestebanu Goicoecheu(„Policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah- Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ- Člena 31 in 32- Evropski nalog za prijetje in postopki predaje med državami članicami- Možnost, da država, ki izvršuje zahtevo za izročitev, uporabi konvencijo, sprejeto pred 1. januarjem 2004, ki pa se v tej državi uporablja od poznejšega datuma“)(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložil Chambrede l'instructiondela cour d'appelde Montpellier).

Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States.
Okvirni sklep Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami.

The definition of serious crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States.
Opredelitev hudih kaznivih dejanj bi morala biti vzeta iz člena 2 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami.