Kaj je TOLERABLE RISK OF ERROR v Slovenščini - Slovenski prevod

• dopustno tveganje napake
• sprejemljivo tveganje napak
• dopustnem tveganju napake

Primeri uporabe Tolerable risk of error v Angleški in njihovi prevodi v Slovenski

Tolerable risk of error.
Dopustno tveganje napake.

We do not really need the tolerable risk of error.
Sprejemljivega tveganja napak res ne potrebujemo.

Two examples in this Annual Activity Report are the ongoing EU budget review process, to which the Court has actively contributed, and the issuing by the Commission of its communication on the‘Tolerable risk of error'.
Dva primera v tem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih sta tekoči proces pregleda proračuna EU, h kateremu Sodišče dejavno prispeva, in Komisijina objava sporočila o„dopustnem tveganju napake“.

The Commission will produce a Communication on the Tolerable Risk of Error in the field of external aid in 2010.
Leta 2010 bo pripravila sporočilo o dopustnem tveganju napak na področju zunanje pomoči.

To make matters worse, the Commission and Parliament are now discussing a tolerable risk of error.
Da bi bilo še slabše, Komisija in Parlament zdaj razpravljata o dopustnem tveganju napake.

The Commission will produce a Communication on the Tolerable Risk of Error in the field of external aid in 2010.
V letu 2010 bo pripravila sporočilo o dopustnem tveganju napake na področju zunanje pomoči.

As Mr Kallas was also saying, Parliament must strive to find an equilibrium in the tolerable risk of error.
Kot je dejal tudi gospod Kallas, si mora Parlament prizadevati za ravnovesje pri sprejemljivem tveganju napak.

The Commission has noted in its communication that any decision on a tolerable risk of error should be based, among other things, on the potential for further simplification.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu poudarila, da mora vsaka odločitev o dopustnem tveganju napake med drugim temeljiti na možnosti za nadaljnjo poenostavitev.

Increase accountability: responsibilities of implementing partners and'Tolerable risk of error'.
Povečanje odgovornosti: dolžnosti partnerjev pri izvrševanju in„dopustno tveganje napake“.

I hope as well that, when the colegislator has agreed on a tolerable risk of error, the Court of Auditors will consider this new concept in the way it finds appropriate.
Upam tudi, da bo Računsko sodišče, ko se bo sozakonodajalec dogovoril o sprejemljivem tveganju napak, preučilo ta novi koncept na način, ki se mu zdi ustrezen.

At the end of 2008 the Commission issued a communication‘Towards a common understanding of the concept of tolerable risk of error'.
Ob koncu leta 2008 je Komisija izdala sporočilo„k enotnemu razumevanju koncepta dopustnega tveganja napake“.

Therefore, the Commission has proposed that for EAFRD expenditure, a tolerable risk of error level be set in the range between 2 and 5%.
Zato je Komisija predlagala, da se za odhodke EKSRP določi tolerančno tveganje stopnje napak v razponu od 2% do 5%.

The proposed level of tolerable risk of error is established taking into account the cost-effectiveness of the controls and an acceptable level of residual error that is justified in the light of these costs.
Predlagana raven dopustnega tveganja napake se določi ob upoštevanju stroškovne učinkovitosti nadzora in dopustne stopnje preostalih napak, ki je upravičena zaradi teh stroškov.

The Committee supports the Commission proposal to increase the tolerable risk of error in the research field.
V tem smislu Odbor podpira predlog Komisije, da se za raziskave zviša raven dopustnega tveganja za napake.

Note: this section only concerns the process of grant management, for administrative and operational expenditure implemented through public procurement processes the 2% ceiling will apply as tolerable risk of error.
Opomba: ta oddelek zadeva le postopke upravljanja subvencij, za upravne in operativne odhodke, ki bodo nastajali v postopkih javnega naročanja, bo kot dopustno tveganje napak veljala zgornja meja 2 odstotka.

On 26 May, the Commission adopted a Communication(4) proposing a tolerable risk of error level in this range(2 %-5%).
Komisija je 26. maja sprejela sporočilo(4), v katerem predlaga raven dopustnega tveganja napake v tem razponu(2%- 5%).

In other words, instead of specifying the number of checks to be undertaken the aim should be to set a level of residual risk of irregularity to be achieved by the system i.e. a tolerable risk of error.
Z drugimi besedami, namesto, da se določi število pregledov, ki bodo opravljeni, bi moral biti cilj določiti stopnjo preostalega tveganja nepravilnosti, ki jo mora doseči sistem, torej dopustno tveganje napak.

Therefore, the Commission has proposed that for EAFRD expen diture, a tolerable risk of error level be set in the range between 2 and 5%.
Zato je Komisija predla gala, da se za odhodke EKSRP določi tolerančno tveganje stopnje napak v razponu od 2% do 5%.

So a higher tolerable risk of errors, as supported in your report, could allow the Commission to modulate the control effort, to optimise cost effectiveness and to balance the need for effective control with establishing a more trust-based relationship with researchers.
Zato bi višja stopnja dopustnega tveganja za napake, kot jo podpira vaše poročilo, Komisiji lahko omogočila določiti prizadevanja za nadzor, optimizirati stroškovno učinkovitost in uravnotežiti potrebo po učinkovitem nadzoru z vzpostavitvijo odnosa z raziskovalci, utemeljenega na medsebojnem zaupanju.

In this respect, the Committee supports the Commission proposal to increase the tolerable risk of error in the research field1.
V tem smislu Odbor podpira predlog Komisije, da se za raziskave zviša raven dopustnega tveganja za napake.1.

In this context, the pertinent question might not be whether there is a‘tolerable risk of error' but whether the risk of error is so great that the particular scheme or programme in question should be discontinued or substantially changed.
V okviru tega morda ni pomembno vprašanje, ali obstaja„dopustno tveganje napake“, ampak ali je tveganje napake tako veliko, da bi bilo treba določeno shemo ali zadevni program ukiniti ali bistveno spremeniti.

We also need to define together an acceptable ratio between costs and risk- the so-called'tolerable risk of error'.
Poleg tega moramo skupaj opredeliti sprejemljivo razmerje med stroški in tveganjem- tako imenovano"sprejemljivo tveganje napak".

The European Parliament and the Council should therefore determine the level of tolerable risk of error per policy area, taking into account the costs and benefits of controls.
Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala zato določiti raven dopustnega tveganja napake po področjih politik ter pri tem upoštevati stroške in koristi kontrol.

The three-year reform of the Financial Regulation will enable us to establish the legal basis for this simplification, but I do not think that tinkering with the tolerable risk of error is the right way to go.
Triletna reforma finančne uredbe nam bo omogočila, da določimo pravno podlago za to poenostavitev, vendar dvomim, da je ukvarjanje z dopustnim tveganjem napake pravi način.

I think that, together with proposals on simplification and with the introduction of the concept of tolerable risk of error, this will allow significant improvements in the situation with the management of structural funds.
Menim, da bo to skupaj s predlogi o poenostavitvi in uvedbo koncepta o sprejemljivem tveganju napake omogočilo znatne izboljšave položaja upravljanja strukturnih skladov.

In contrast, the Commission says that it wants cost-effective control and suggests that there is a tolerable risk of error, which must be taken into account from the start.
Nasprotno pa Komisija pravi, da si želi stroškovno učinkovitega nadzora, vendar obstaja sprejemljivo tveganje napak, ki ga je treba upoštevati od samega začetka.

On 26 May 2010 the Commission adopted a Communication proposing a tolerable risk of error in this area of between 2 and 5%(5).
Komisija je 26. maja 2010 sprejela sporočilo drugim institucijam, v katerem je predlagala, da bi za to področje veljala raven dopustnega tveganja napake med 2% in 5%(5).

I fully agree with the rapporteur that the Commission is putting a disproportionately large effort into convincing us in Parliament of the need to introduce a tolerable risk of error, rather than trying to persuade Member States of the need for mandatory national management declarations.
Popolnoma se strinjam s poročevalcem, da si nas v Parlamentu Komisija prizadeva nesorazmerno zavzeto prepričati, da je treba uvesti sprejemljivo tveganje napak, namesto da bi prepričala države članice, da morajo obvezno predložiti izjave o nacionalnem upravljanju.

In the context of such revisions, the legislative authorities and the Commission should consider trying to set a level of residual risk of irregularity to be achieved by the system(i.e. the tolerable risk of error) rather than specifying the number of checks to be undertaken, as is the case now.
Glede na takšne spremembe bi morali zakonodajni organi in Komisija premisliti o tem, da se poskusi določiti stopnja preostalega tveganja nepravilnosti, ki jo mora doseči sistem(torej dopustno tveganje napak), namesto določanja števila pregledov, ki bodo opravljeni, kot se počne zdaj.

Today, with wisdom and respect for good management, and using tolerable risks of error, but also taking into account independent re-audits, and if that fails- as I proposed, and as was accepted- bringing in an independent mediator, we must regain the confidence of all our research institutes, with proper monitoring and European funding, of course.
Danes moramo z modrostjo in spoštovanjem dobrega upravljanja ter uporabo dopustnega tveganja za napake, toda tudi ob upoštevanju neodvisnih ponovnih revizij, in če to ne uspe- kot sem predlagal in je bilo sprejeto-, z uvedbo mediatorja, ponovno pridobiti zaupanje vseh naših raziskovalnih institutov, seveda z ustreznim spremljanjem in evropskim financiranjem.