Exemplos de uso de Anydrous ethanol em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Until 1992 the percentage of anydrous ethanol in gasoline was of 14.
The results for the estimate of the equation of supply of anydrous ethanol were.
Specifically in case of anydrous ethanol, the price to the final consumer was embedded in the gasoline price.
The formula of elasticity for variations in supply of anydrous ethanol is given by 8.
The percntage of anydrous ethanol added to gasoline to compose gasoline C has been changing along the years.
The inter-relation among prices of gasoline A,gasoline C and anydrous ethanol is shown in Picture 2.
As the anydrous ethanol is equivalent about 10% of the price of the gasoline, the reduction of gasoline C price would be about 10.
It is interesting to detach that the evolution of the relative price between anydrous ethanol and gasoline C has influenced the percentage of adopted mixture.
In the case of the anydrous ethanol, this result can be associated to the fact of that the producer price was only set free in 1997 middle.
In a second stage, supply anddemand equations are etimated which take in account the interrelation between the gasoline and fuel anydrous ethanol markets.
In the equation esteem for supply of anydrous ethanol the signals of the coefficients were also gotten in agreement the waited one.
In the harvest of 2000/01 of the Middle-South region,the five biggest groups commercialized 63% of hydrated ethanol and 56% of the anydrous ethanol produced.
Thus, the final product x is gasoline C, the anydrous ethanol is the raw material, and gasoline A is the input of commercialization b.
To evaluate which price will increase more than proportionally than the other it must be considered the supply elasticities of the anydrous ethanol ea and of gasoline A eb.
For the analysis of the anydrous ethanol market, it is considered an adaptation of this model and the analyses of Barros 1987.
The prices to the final ethanol consumer were formed from the prices paid to producers plus freight,mixture in case of anydrous ethanol and taxes costs.
In supply of anydrous ethanol, the coefficient of the sugar price was significant and acted more if comparative with the hydrated ethanol price.
These results took the values of elasticity of transmission lesser that the unit,either for situations of variations in the gasoline demand C or supply of anydrous ethanol.
Anydrous ethanol can be produced by azeotropic distillation(cyclohexane), by extractive distillation(mono ethylene glycol) or by molecular sieves technology zeolytes.
In this context,it is understood like transmission elasticity the relative variation of the price to the anydrous ethanol producer with the relative variation in the price of gasoline C to retail.
The equations 11 and 12 jointly give to origin the function of supply of gasoline C for the fuel deliverers, and the equations 10 and12 give to origin the function of demand for the anydrous ethanol.
The equation 10 represents the function of demand for gasoline C to the retail;11 it represents the function of supply of the anydrous ethanol of the producer; 12 it represents the function of supply of the gasoline A in the refinery.
The reduction was way smaller, however, which calls for inquiry, in the effective conditions, how price reduction at the refinery would interfere on the supplying andprices of gasoline A and anydrous ethanol.
In the light of this model it is also possible to evaluate what occurs to the relative prices of anydrous ethanol, of gasoline A and of gasoline C, when it variations occur in the demand for gasoline C or in the supply of anydrous or gasoline A.
Once in possession of the gasoline A, the deliverer would compose the price of gasoline C sold to the retailers,considering the percentages of the anydrous ethanol mixture stablished by the government.
The equations of demand of gasoline C to the retail,supply of gasoline A in the refinery and supply of anydrous ethanol to the producer were esteem jointly by method SUR-Seemingly Unrelated Regression, admitting that the errors of the equations can be related.
Supply of anydrous ethanol expects that the relative impacts to the variable sugar price in the domestic market, hydrated ethanol price to the producer andsugar cane price are negative, while the referring impact to the anydrous ethanol price must be positive.
It is assumed that each unit of gasoline C can be produced using 0,2 unit of anydrous and0,8 unit of gasoline A, that is, anydrous ethanol and gasoline A are used in ratio 1 to 4.
Where: ea represents the price elasticity of anydrous ethanol supply; eb represents the price elasticity of gasoline A supply; represents the parcel of the sugar and ethanol sector in consumer's expenditures; represents the parcel of supply of gasoline A in consumer's expenditures; represents the elasticity of substitution between and a the b.
Of this form, was possible to construct to one theoretician model that allowed to evaluate the consequences of the competitive balance in the anydrous ethanol market and gasoline C. The empirical model was constituted of three equations represented by 10, 11 e 12.