Exemplos de uso de Comparing both groups em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The X test was applied for comparing both groups.
When comparing both groups, we found no statistical difference in the 14 postoperative day.
Another one showed no difference when comparing both groups.
When comparing both groups it was noticed a decrease of approximately 30% in the drain debt.
There were no statistically significant differences about age on comparing both groups.
For comparing both groups for averages, the Student's t test was employed.
Regarding P300 and MMN, there were no significant differences when comparing both groups.
When comparing both groups, the difference was significant only at 72h, better in the control group. .
Pain, anxiety, depression andalexithymia evaluation results comparing both groups are shown in table 2.
Comparing both groups, we noticed that the patients submitted to hemodialysis already had weak respiratory muscles MIP.
RESULTS: the characteristics of chewing andswallowing have varied considerably when comparing both groups.
The Mann-Whitney test was used with the purpose of comparing both groups in relation to the variables studied.
When comparing both groups, the plate group showed an average of 6.92 days against2.36 for the nail group. .
In the postoperative period, there was reduction in anxiety levels, butwe did not find a significant difference between levels of anxiety when comparing both groups.
When comparing both groups, there was a statistically significant difference in relation to normal findings as well as regarding the changed ones.
For analysis, we used the chi-square test or the exact test ofFisher for 2×2 tables, with the purpose of comparing both groups with regard to the presence of each of the mentioned alterations.
The results were obtained by comparing both groups with the purpose of verifying in which group maturation occurred more distinctly.
In Table 1, it is presented the number of subjects and the percentage of alterations presented by children with PD andTFD in the SS evaluation, comparing both groups through the percentage of errors of each one.
When comparing both groups, parametric or non-parametric methods were used, according to the distribution pattern of the outcome variables.
As a result, an improvement in the values of EFP occurred in the group that performed the electroanalgesia with value P< 0.005; however,when comparing both groups, there was no statistical difference in the values of FVC and FEV1, which are similar to those of this study.
When comparing both groups, an alpha error of 0.05 was accepted, as well as an expected difference among the means of 15%, and 20% within each group. .
By assessing SF-36 results, we noticed that the patients submitted to unilateral procedure showed a higher number of highly scored criteria than the other group; however,sample is small and the only item that seems to present a significant difference when comparing both groups is social aspects.
When comparing both groups study and control concerning these variables, no statistically significant differences were found, as displayed in Table 1.
After checking for data normality by the Shapiro Wilks test, we used the Mann Whitney's non-parametric test for comparing control and diabetic groups in terms of Arch Index, CSI, and Angle A, andthe chi-squared non-parametric test for comparing both groups for each ordinal MLA classification flat, normal, and cavus.
When comparing both groups in relation to the mean, the Wilcoxon-Man-Whitney U test WMW was used, because frequencies did not follow a normal distribution.
However, when analyzing the groups, it was found that infants of adolescent mothers who live with their grandmothers Group A showed a better motor performance compared with infants who live only with their parents Group B. When comparing both groups, a significant difference in motor performance was observed Mann-Whitney test- p=0.0167 Graph 1.
When comparing both groups, no significant difference was also found for the mean and median of VOT, as well as for the length of vowels and aerodynamic measures.
Comparing both groups, one can conclude that the Avá-Canoeiro who have been'on the move' longer, such as the ones from the Araguaia, have lost and/or stopped making a series of items of their material culture.
In comparing both groups with regard to pain intensity after the techniques, it was observed, in general, that G1 had lower values as compared to G2, being this result statistically significant p.
Comparing both groups, it was seen that all“Program” women above older than 40 years old were submitted to mammography, whereas in the Physician Group, 3 out of 16 patients in the same age group were not.