Exemplos de uso de Comparison of normal value em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The comparison of normal value with export price was made on an ex-factory basis and at the same level of trade.
In all other respects andin the absence of further comments, the provisional findings concerning the comparison of normal value to export price as set out in recital(94)of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
The comparison of normal value with the export price should be made at the genuinely similar commercial stage, whether this is fob or ex-works.
It would furthermore be contrary to the consistent practice of the Commission to use different time frames i.e. monthly for the comparison of normal value and export price and yearly for the other steps of the dumping calculation.
The allegation of dumping is based on a comparison of normal value, thus calculated, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.
Apart from the adjustments made, as set out in recitals 22 to 25 of this Regulation,the contents of recitals 25 to 30 of the provisional Regulation in relation to the comparison of normal value and export prices, are hereby confirmed.
The allegation of dumping is based on a comparison of normal value established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned to the Community.
Subject to the provisions governing fair comparison in paragraph 4 of this Article,the existence of margins of injurious pricing during the investigation phase shall normally be established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average of prices of all comparable export transactions or by a comparison of normal value and export prices on a transaction to transaction basis.
In the absence of comments on the comparison of normal value and export prices, the provisional conclusions as set out in recital(35) of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
In view of the provisions of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation,the complainant established normal value for the People's Republic of China on the basis of a constructed normal value in a market economy country which is mentioned in point 5.1(d). The allegation of dumping is based on a comparison of normal value, thus calculated, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.
The allegation of dumping in respect of Taiwan is based on a comparison of normal value established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.
Furthermore, a comparison of normal value based on the company's own costs/domestic prices and its export prices would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measure.
The allegation of dumping in respect of the United States of America is based on a comparison of normal value established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned to the Community.
Tuntex provided evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own cost/domestic prices and its export prices to a third country market would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measure 27,7.
The allegation of dumping in respect of Guatemala andPakistan is based on a comparison of normal value established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned to the Community.
Furthermore, it was claimed that a comparison of normal value based on its costs or domestic prices and export prices to the Community would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measures applying to imports from the applicant, i.e. 17,8.
Since no targeting by customer, region or time period was identified,the Community industry's claim is rejected and the comparison of normal value to export price on the basis of a weighted average to weighted average approach is maintained as the appropriate methodology.
Furthermore, the applicant provided evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own cost/domestic prices and its export prices to the enlarged European Union, would lead to a dumping margin significantly below the level of the current measure.
The allegation of continuation of dumping in respect of Japan is based on a comparison of normal value, established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned to the Community.
The applicant alleges andprovides evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own costs and prices, and export prices to the EU, would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measures.
The allegation of dumping in respect of the Republic of Korea is based on a comparison of normal value established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned to the Community.
Furthermore, the applicant has provided evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own cost/domestic prices and its export prices to the enlarged EU, would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measure.
The allegation of likelihood of continuation of dumping in respect of Russia andTurkey is based on a comparison of normal value, established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.
The applicant has provided evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own cost/domestic prices and its export prices to a third country market comparable to the EU, would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measure.
The allegation of dumping in respect of Egypt andRussia is based on a comparison of normal value established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.
The applicant alleges andprovides evidence showing that a comparison of normal value in an appropriate market economy third country and its export prices to the EU over an extended period, would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measures.
The applicants alleged and provided sufficient prima facie evidence that a comparison of normal value based on their own costs/domestic prices and their export prices to the Community would lead to a removal of dumping.
Several other Chinese producers andone Taiwanese producer claimed that, in the comparison of normal value on the Taiwanese market with export price, no adjustment had been made to reflect the differences in direct selling expenses for sales to OEM customers on the export market and for sales to non-OEM customers on the domestic market.
The allegation of continuation of dumping for Russian Federation is based on a comparison of normal value, established on the basis of domestic prices, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.
Furthermore, the applicant provided evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own cost/domestic prices and its export prices to the USA as a third country market comparable to the EU, would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measure.