Exemplos de uso de Fair value method em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Demaria and Dufour 2007 found that theoperational sector is the main determinant so that a manager chooses the fair value method.
The fair value resulting from the application of the"fair value method" is disclosed in note E 3.3.3.1 for information purposes only.
As for the indebtedness,the fact that the company is in debt increases by 22.58% the probability that it chooses the fair value method.
Found that the probability that a company chooses the fair value method is greater where the pre-IFRS domestic standard required or allowed measuring assets at fair value. .
In Chile, there was greater preference for the historical cost method, despite the possibility of adopting the fair value method.
These findings indicate that larger companies tend to measure their intangible assets through the fair value method and smaller companies tend to do so through the historical cost method. .
For the variable country,the fact the entity belongs to Brazil reduces by 60.9% the probability that the company chooses the fair value method.
This result may indicate that, for the Brazilian and Portuguese companies,the choice of the fair value method may be justified for many reasons, but not to directly improve their results.
However, from 2010 to 2013 comparability was low,because some entities chose the historical cost method and others the fair value method.
The change from the current valuation method to this"fair value method" will be effective on 1 January 2006 and the related adjustment will be recognised in the fair value reserve.
Regarding the variable country,it was found that the fact the entity belongs to Brazil reduces the likelihood that the company chooses the fair value method by 60.90.
Comparability was high in Brazil due to legal prohibition to adopt the fair value method for subsequent measurement of intangible assets, as well as using estimated cost at the time of early adoption.
There was also the fact that ifthe entity shows loss within the period, it reduces by 19.71% the probability to choose the fair value method to valuation after recognition of IPs.
As for IPs IAS 40, out of the 33 firms that recognized them,9 chose the fair value method and 24 the cost method, noticing a strong conservative trend in the accounting reports of the French firms.
These results corroborate the findings of Christensen and Nikolaev 2013,who found that company's indebtedness is positively associated with choosing the fair value method.
In this way, the ninth hypothesis tested is: H9:There is a positive association between time and choosing the fair value method for subsequent measurement of fixed assets, intangible assets, and IP.
On the contrary, when there is net profit,the fact that the company has shown loss for the fiscal year does not influence on the accounting choice of managers for the fair value method.
As a result, the sixth hypothesis tested in this study is: H6:There is a positive association between profitability and choosing the fair value method for subsequent measurement of fixed assets, intangible assets, and IP.
If the fair value method is chosen, the assets should be measured at their fair value, which becomes the basis for subsequent measurements, in order to calculate depreciation/amortization and losses due to accumulated impairment.
As for the variable indebtedness,it was found that the fact that the company is in debt increases by 22.58% the probability to choose the fair value method for valuation after recognition of IPs.
In Peru, although some listed companies have chosen the fair value method before mandatory IFRS adoption, after their adoption most entities began employing the historical cost method, thus becoming more conservative.
For the variable relevance, it was found that the higher the balance of IPs in relation to total assets,the greater the entity's likelihood to choose the fair value method in its subsequent valuation.
That is, all firms in the sectors non-cyclic consumption andpublic utility chose the fair value method and all firms in the sectors primary materials and telecommunications chose the cost method. .
Analyzing comparability evolution over time, it was found that the Brazilian national comparability has slowly increased,due to companies' migration to the fair value method Table 7.
In addition to the intrinsic factors of each nation or each company,the fact that Brazil has not allowed using the fair value method before IFRS adoption but Portugal has may be one of the factors that justify this result.
Peru, before IFRS adoption 2009 and 2010, showed a moderate national comparability, because while most listed companies adopted the historical cost method, the others adopted the fair value method Table 6.
First, why, although there is the possibility of using the fair value method for subsequent measurement of fixed assets and intangible assets, do most companies still prefer to adopt the historical cost method for valuation of such assets?
Similarly, listed companies using estimated cost at the time of first adoption IFRS 1 were regarded as choosing the fair value method, at that particular business year, for regression calculation.
The fair value method, when reliably measured, improves comparability of financial reports, while the cost method may hamper comparability, both by failing to identify similarities between similar items and by not distinguishing differences between different items.
Thus, the second hypothesis tested in this research is: H2:There is a positive association between indebtedness level and choosing the fair value method for subsequent measurement of fixed assets, intangible assets, and IP.