Exemplos de uso de General anesthesia group em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
General anesthesia group.
This pressure was the same used in the general anesthesia group.
In the general anesthesia group 26 patients reported great satisfaction while three reported being reasonably satisfied.
So, one can say that mean VAS at rest at 0 h and6 h is significantly higher in the general anesthesia group Table 5.
We found that the general anesthesia group had more episodes of NVPO, with six cases 15%, compared to four cases 10.3% recorded for the paravertebral group. .
The sample for the second phase consisted of 66 patients: 34 in the general anesthesia group and 32 in the paravertebral group. .
When the mean values of VAS at rest were compared between the anesthesia groups at the several times measured,it appears to be always higher in the general anesthesia group.
In the evaluation of symptoms,the paravertebral group had lower values compared to the general anesthesia group, although it was not statistically significant Table 10.
In the general anesthesia group, propofol 2.5 mg. kg was used for induction after the intravenous administration of 0.5% lidocaine 1 mL.10 kg, followed by the insertion of a laryngeal mask.
None of the patients in the spinal anesthesia group required a nasogastric tube while it was necessary in 14 patients in the general anesthesia group, and this difference was significant.
In the general anesthesia group, it was necessary to adequate ventilatory parameters while none of the patients in the spinal anesthesia group had any complaints, and this difference was significant.
During surgery, the average consumption of fentanyl was significantly lower p<0.01 in the paravertebral group 2.38± 0.81 µg kg compared with the general anesthesia group 3.51± 0.81 µg kg Table 5.
In that study, the authors report a greater number of elderly individuals and smokers in the general anesthesia group, but they did not describe the rate and correlated their results to the lack of humidification of the anesthetic gases.
While high comorbidity rate and a little need of postoperative care were being found in the locoregional group, longer duration of anesthesia andsurgery were found out in the general anesthesia group.
Of the 66 evaluated patients, 10 were diagnosed with pain characteristic of intercostobrachial neuralgia seven in the general anesthesia group and three in the paravertebral group, although the difference was not significant p 0.3.
Preoperatively, all patients were stratified into two groups according to the type of surgery, HADS score, and age:paravertebral group general anesthesia combined with paravertebral block and general anesthesia group.
The study demonstrated that in the general anesthesia group, there was a higher rate of pregnancy 56.3% versus 44.7%; p=0.47 and a greater number of embryos transferred 2.7 versus 2.4; p=0.045, with data that is similar to that found in the present study.
Participants are needed in each group considering 1% mortality in neuraxial anesthesia group, 5% mortality in general anesthesia group, 80% statistical power, and 5% significance level.
In the present study, the incidence of this complication in the general anesthesia group is comparable to that reported in other studies that used only general anesthesia and in those comparing general anesthesia and regional block.
The mean time SD for the blockade to reach T3 was 7.35 1.05minutes Table II. In the spinal anesthesia group, the duration of anesthesia was similar to the duration of the surgery, both ended at the same time, while in the general anesthesia group it lasted 10 minutes more than the time of the surgery.
Compared to postoperative morphine consumption, there was a higher proportion of patients in the general anesthesia group: 80% of patients in contrast to 67.5% of the paravertebral group, although there was no statistically significant differences p 0.3.
Of the patients who consumed morphine, the general anesthesia group consumed more than twice the paravertebral group, with an average of 7 mg±6.4 in general anesthesia group and 3.5 mg±3.4 in paravertebral group, a difference statistically significant p 0.002.
Regarding VAS evaluated during movement, which involves a 90° abduction of the limb ipsilateral to surgery,at all time-points, the general anesthesia group had mean values higher than those recorded for the paravertebral group with statistical significance Table 5.
Lower limb amputation had an incidence of 6% in the spinal block group, 4% in the epidural block group, and 7% in the general anesthesia group p 0.68, when compared with the spinal block group, and 6% p 0.52 when compared with the epidural block group. Those differences were not statistically significant Figure 3.
In both groups hemodynamic changes, the need of nasogastric tube, time of pneumoperitoneum, time of anesthesia spinal anesthesia group: from the puncture to the dressing; general anesthesia group: from intubation to extubation, and the need to increase intra-abdominal pressure higher than 8 mmHg were evaluated.
There was a greater number of intraoperative hypotension in the paravertebral group 9 versus 3 cases, with statistically significant difference p 0.007 and need for ephedrine administration in 22.5% of patients in paravertebral group and 2.5% in the general anesthesia group; five cases had bradycardia HR< 50 in both groups, with 12.5% of patients in paravertebral group and 7.5% in the general anesthesia group requiring atropine administration.
In control group, general anesthesia was initiated immediately after initial monitoring.
The group general anesthesia had a higher number of patients 14; 35% with severe pain VAS at rest>= 7 over 24 h compared with the paravertebral group 6; 6.