Exemplos de uso de Instrument was validated em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
This instrument was validated in several countries.
The content of the instrument was validated using a pre- test.
This instrument was validated in the United States, with a sample of medical-surgical nurses. It includes questions encompassing actions performed by nurses in the practice of health advocacy, its possible consequences in the work environment, the influence of knowledge and personal values of the nurses to work in health advocacy, as well as the facilitators and barriers to the practice of health advocacy in nursing.
The authors argued for not excluding them, since the instrument was validated in 11 countries and presented good psychometric results.
The instrument was validated in a work by in three studies.
The proposal was adequate and the content of the instrument was validated in a single step, with a percentage of agreement above that established in the literature to be considered valid.
The instrument was validated and has been used in several studies.
The instrument was validated in the Portuguese language, and is called"Brazil- SF-36.
This instrument was validated and deemed appropriate to be applied in Brazilian adolescents.
This instrument was validated by four experts and applied to 51 undergraduate distance learning cour.
In 2013, when the instrument was validated, the percentage of coverage of FHS was 33.6%, and, in July 2015, 53.6.
In 2013, when the instrument was validated, the percentage of coverage of FHSb b Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica.
The instrument was validated by the nurses who worked in the Rooming-In unit and the Workshop was structured in two meetings.
This instrument was validated for use in the Brazilian population and its use was recommended by the Epidemigoly Standardization Projects.
The content of the instrument was validated by two nurse teachers, specialists in Nursing Care Systematization, with their suggestions included.
When this instrument was validated in China, the mean global scores obtained for the sample 48.8 were higher than those found in this study.
The instrument was validated in a pilot test from which nine pregnant women undergoing prenatal follow-up at the FHU of Vista Alegre were drawn.
The instrument was validated, as to its content and appearance, by four health professionals knowledgeable in the theoretical framework two nurses and two physicians.
This instrument was validated for the Portuguese language by Xavier and collaborators in 2001, with intra-rater reliability measured by the weighted Kappa coefficient K=0.81.
The instrument was validated in 248 families served by the Family Health Strategy FHS and its performance was tested using widely used scales, such as the Katz Index and the Lawton scale.
The instrument was validated in the United States with a sample of 303 nursing students and consists of questions that address curriculum and teaching, professional social interaction, and the learning environment.
The instrument is validated by factor analysis, followed by the Varimax method.
Once the instruments were validated, the evaluation of the website was performed.
However, few instruments are validated for use in Brazilian samples.
The second interviewer was a nurse who received training about the studied construct, the instrument being validated and the interview method.
Both instruments were validated and adequate for the Brazilian reality, and were recommended by the Ministry of Health.
All three instruments are validated for the Portuguese language spoken in Brazil, and the authors' consent for use in research was obtained.
The instruments were validated by eight professors with Ph. Ds with experience in nursing diagnoses and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, who participated as judges.
Two instruments were validated for the Brazilian population and had their reliability assessed showing adequate levels- domain sensitivity of the Fugl-Meyer Scale FMS and Nottingham Sensory Assessment NSA.
In order to measure the health status of patients whose language and culture are different from those for which the questionnaire was developed,it is recommended that the instrument be validated.