Exemplos de uso de Overall data submitted em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
During its June 2005 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Lansopon.
During their September 2006 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Glucomed and associated names for the relief of symptoms in mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee, that there was no objection for the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics.
During its September 2005 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Lansoprazol AbZ-Pharma.
During its July 2008 meeting, the CVMP,in light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, adopted by consensus an opinion concluding that the assessment of the risk presented by toltrazuril and its major metabolite, toltrazuril sulfone, to terrestrial plants and to groundwater demonstrated that use of products containing toltrazuril is acceptable.
During its January 2005 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that a marketing authorisation should be granted.
During its May 2006 meeting, the CVMP,in light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, adopted by consensus an opinion recommending the suspension of the marketing authorisations for Suramox 15% LA and the Stabox 15% LA, for cattle and pigs.
During its 12-15 September 2005 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee was of the opinion that a marketing authorisation should be granted subject to certain conditions considered essential for the safe and effective use of the medicinal product.
During their January 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the objections that triggered the Article 29 Referral, should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation for Alendronate HEXAL and associated names.
During their April 2008 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the objections that triggered the Article 29 Referral should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation for Oracea and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their 16-19 July 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Xeomin, that the objections raised by Finland, France and Italy, should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their January 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Ciprofloxacin Hikma and associated names, that the objections raised should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During its January 2004 meeting, the CPMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that although, the development of the product and the presence of avoidable impurities have raised important quality concerns, there appears to be no safety concerns arising from the impurity profile in this product, based on the toxicology studies provided by the company.
During their November 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Menitorix, that the objections raised by Greece, Poland and Spain should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their September 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Bicaluplex and associated names, that the objections raised by Germany should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their May 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Vantas, that the objections raised by Germany, Spain, Ireland, Italy and the United Kingdom should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their June 2008 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Activelle and associated names, that the objections raised by France and Germany should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During the June 2006 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Cardoreg 4 mg prolonged release tablets and associated names, that the objections raised should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During the January 2006 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Nifedipine Pharmamatch retard 30 and 60 mg tablets, that the objections raised by United Kingdom should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their June 2008 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Rapinyl and associated names, that the objections raised by Germany, France, Norway and United Kingdom should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, Labelling and Package Leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their July 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Fentanyl- ratiopharm 25/ 50/ 75/ 100 µg/ h TTS and associated names, that the objections raised by France should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During the June 2006 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Doxazosin Retard“ Arrow” 4 mg prolonged release tablets and associated names, that the objections raised by should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their 13-16 November 2006 meeting, the CHMP, in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Ciprofloxacin Nycomed and associated names, that the objections raised by Norway and Sweden should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended.
During their 18- 21 June 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Lansoprazole and associated names, that the objections raised by the Czech Republic, Spain and Portugal should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the valid Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet are the final versions achieved during the Coordination group procedure.
During their December 2007 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/ risk ratio is favourable for Yasminelle and associated names, that the objections raised by Hungary should not prevent the approval of the variation applied for and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be the final versions achieved during the Coordination group procedure.
Due to the serious deficiencies outlined above and the impossibility of verifying the information submitted, it had to be concluded that data submitted were overall unreliable and inaccurate.
During its July 2008 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall submitted data and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the proposal for the harmonisation of the SPC, Labelling and Package Leaflet was acceptable and that they should be amended.
During its 21- 24 April 2008 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall submitted data and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the proposal for the harmonisation of the SPC, Labelling and Package leaflet was acceptable and that they should be amended.
During its 29 May- 1 June 2006 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall submitted data and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the proposal for the harmonisation of the SPC, Labelling and Package leaflet was acceptable and that they should be amended.
During its June 2008 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall submitted data and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the proposal for the harmonisation of the SPC, Labelling and Package leaflet including the quality aspects was acceptable and that they should be amended.
During its 21- 24 April 2008 meeting, the CHMP,in the light of the overall submitted data and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the proposal for the harmonisation of the SPC, Labelling and Package leaflet including the quality aspects was acceptable and that they should be amended.