Exemplos de uso de Phonemic segmentation em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
He couldn't perform activities involving phonemic segmentation.
In the phonemic segmentation, it was asked which were the sounds of the word"sapo.
This test was composed of four tasks: phonemic blending and exclusion,rhyme identification and phonemic segmentation.
The subtask of phonemic segmentation five phonemes showed the strongest correlation in a negative way.
The illiterate adults performed better on tasks of rhyme, alliteration, andsegmentation of syllables than in phonemic segmentation tasks.
Phonemic segmentation: the child has to divide a word spoken by the examiner into its component phonemes;
These studies also show that tasks involving phonemic segmentation, detection and production of rhymes are very hard for children with Down syndrome.
In this case, the formal exposition to the code during one school year was not enough for a performance variation of CG children;only the EG after possessing the written code could succeed in the phonemic segmentation task.
On the phonemic segmentation task the participant only registered score at T3, which seems to indicate that this ability is a consequence of literacy.
After assessment, in each of the 12 sessions in Phase II,training was conducted on phonemic segmentation and transposition related to the reading skills of consonant-vowel-consonant C-V-C pseudowords.
As seen in the Phonemic Segmentation task, the results disagree with the position of Jenkins& Bowen 1994 that it is necessary the exposition to formal instructions of alphabetic writing so that the phonemes are realized.
This test contains 10 tasks: syllabic andphonemic synthesis; syllabic and phonemic segmentation; rhyme; alliteration; syllabic and phonemic manipulation, syllabic and phonemic transposition.
The phonemic segmentation requires the discovery of minimal units that do not separate the continuous chain of speech and, even at this level of targeting, some tasks are more difficult than others, depending on the segmental structure presented.
When comparing the performances of groups GIIe and GIIc,a statistically significant difference was verified in the subtests of identification of final phoneme, phonemic segmentation and phonemic transposition, suggesting better performance of GIIe.
The ability to segment,especially phonemic segmentation, is one of the most difficult levels to be reached among the phonological awareness skills. With formal teaching this skill is better developed.
There were no significant findings for syllabic synthesis- which did not differentiate the groups for being very easy- and the tasks of phonemic awareness,synthesis, phonemic segmentation and phonemic transposition- which were too complex for both groups.
In GIIe differences occurred only in phonemic segmentation and manipulation tests, which reveals that after the application of the program on its interceptive version, the students improved their performance in the evaluation tests.
It is composed by ten subtests: Syllabic Synthesis; Phonemic Synthesis; Rhyme; Alliteration;Syllabic Segmentation; Phonemic Segmentation; Syllabic Manipulation;Phonemic Manipulation; Syllabic Transposition; Phonemic Transposition.
The phonological awareness tasks include segmentation of sentences in words T1; nominal realism T2; rhyme detection T3; syllabic synthesis T4; syllabic segmentation T5; syllable detection T6; syllabic reversion T7; phonemic exclusion T8; phoneme detection T9;phonemic synthesis T10; phonemic segmentation T11 and phonemic reversion T12.
Cuples and Iacono evaluated individuals with Down syndrome at two times during 8,9 months andfound poor performance on the task of phonemic segmentation, however, they concluded that this ability is a strong predictor of reading development in children with Down syndrome.
For the data collection, a Phonological Awareness Task protocol was applied PATP10: Segmentation of sentences into words T1; Nominal Realism T2; Rhymes Detection T3, Syllabic Synthesis T4; Syllable Segmentation T5; Syllable Detection T6; Syllable Reversal T7; Phonemic Exclusion T8; Phoneme Detection T9,Phonemic Synthesis T10; Phonemic Segmentation S11; Phonemic Reversal T12.
After the stimulation, this difference remained statistically significant in the same task. It was considered to befavorable to the girls, though, in tasks of phonemic segmentation for words with six phonemes and in phonemic reversion ones for words with two and three phonemes.
It can be observed that there is a proportional difference between the initial and final evaluations in some tasks rhyme, onset,phonemic counting, phonemic segmentation, sound isolation, sound-word relation, word-word relation and specification of deleted phoneme, in which the proportion in the final evaluation is greater than in the initial one.
In the first and in the last stages, three tasks of the Phonological Awareness Tasks Protoco1 were used, which involved the following phonemic awareness skills: Phonemic Exclusion T1- in initial, final and intermediary position; Phonemic Detection T2- in initial, final and intermediary position;Phonemic Synthesis T3-words with three, four, five, six and seven phonemes; Phonemic Segmentation T4- words with three, four, five, six and seven phonemes, and Phonemic Reversion T5-words with two, three, four and five phonemes.
Our data are in agreement with studies that point to improvement in the performance of the students in the tasks of rhyme, alliteration,phonemic synthesis, phonemic segmentation and reading of words, after intervention, corroborating the influence of phonological awareness skills in reading and writing 5,6,18.
The phonological awareness protocol consists of 14 tasks: rhyme, onset, rhyme conservation, onset conservation, phonemic counting,phonemic substitution, phonemic segmentation, blending, sound deletion, specification of deleted sound, sound-word relation, and word-word relation.
Thus, the performance of the group was significantly better in tasks of detection of the intermediary phoneme;phonemic synthesis of words with three, four, five, six and seven phonemes; phonemic segmentation for words with three, four, five, six and seven phonemes;phonemic reversion for words with two, three, four and five phonemes.
Concerning the phonological awareness, it could be observed that there is a statistically significant mean difference between the initial and final evaluations Table 1 and in the comparisons performed between the initial and final evaluations in the rhyme, onset,phonemic counting, phonemic segmentation, sound isolation, sound-word relation, word-word relation and specification of deleted phoneme tasks Table 4, indicating an evolution of the students in these aspects.