Exemplos de uso de Restrictions to participation em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Our findings showed that self-awareness of restrictions to participation in elderly subjects decreases after one year of hearing aid use.
The decrease between the pre- and post-intervention period was larger in males than in females,which showed that elderly male subjects perceived more their restrictions to participation before the intervention.
Elderly male subjects were more self-aware of restrictions to participation in the emotional and social scales before the phonological intervention.
Thus, the results were both surprising and expected;it was possible to measure quality of life improvements and a reduction in restrictions to participation because of a phonoaudiological intervention.
In Brazil, the Law for Inclusion of People with Disabilities uses restrictions to participation as an indicator for defining disability, and defines the guidelines for the social insertion of this population.
In the present study, the assessment protocol consisted of self-assessment questionnaires;the results showed that these questionnaires adequately measured changes in quality of life and restrictions to participation in daily life.
Elderly subjects in the older age group were more self-aware about restrictions to participation in the emotional scale before the phonoaudiological intervention.
It is thought that elderly males have a better perception of their restrictions because this group- culturally in our society- is often the family provider even when aged;thus, restrictions to participation are perceived as a handicap.
These authors have also found that elderly subjects show effectively fewer restrictions to participation after taking part in hearing rehabilitation programs. The importance of hearing aid fitting is also underlined.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to understand the contradictions and discontinuities in the activity systems of passengers with disability, elderly andobese in the brazilian air transportation originating restrictions to participation during the flight and during the boarding and deplaning process of air travel.
A critical analysis of the results yielded the following conclusions:there is less self-awareness of restrictions to participation after the phonoaudiological intervention in the social and emotional scales in the HHIE questionnaire.
Based on the discussion addressed in ICF-CY on the participation of children and adolescents, this nucleus refers to the validation of standard tools based on classifications for measuring this domain, andthe feasibility of using the ICF-CY structure to identify restrictions to participation.
The second consideration is based on the concept of disability as being socially constructed,meaning that a person will only be disabled and experienced restrictions to participation in front of an audience that considers the person to be disabled, according to its own criteria.
In light of the specificities imposed by different levels of commitment, different investments in technology, staff training and environment adaptation are required to provide truly equivalent opportunities for diverse people or,barring that, reducing the restrictions to participation to a minimum.
Thus, the mean decrease between the pre- and post-intervention periods was significantly higher in males,who once again perceived more their restrictions to participation, and therefore benefitted more after the phonological intervention.
This assessment tool is made up by seven questions used to subjectively look into the results yielded by the hearing aids under the following parameters: 1- time for which hearing aids have been used; 2- benefit; 3- residual limitation in daily life activities; 4- satisfaction;5- residual restrictions to participation; 6- impact on other people; 7- quality of life.
Although the SF36 and the WHODAS 2.0 assess different aspects of related concepts, as the former assesses quality of life related to health andthe latter limitations to day to day activities and restrictions to participation, studies show that a moderate association exists between the scores from the two instruments.
Check Table 3 for the limitations in activities and the restriction to participation.
Factor 2 was made up by items 5 and 6 on residual restriction to participation, and impacto f hearing loss upon others.
In a study done on the English questionnaire similar findings were observed for item 5 residual restriction to participation, and for the German version the same was found for item 1 time of use.
Most evaluated people 256;90.7% did not present restrictions to social participation.
Most people had no restrictions to social participation at the time of evaluation, probably because the most difficult momentto accept the disease happens during diagnosis and treatment.
However, in the correlation between the scale of participation and the SALSA score,it was observed that the total of people with no restrictions to social participation had several classifications in the SALSA score in the clinical paucibacillary and multibacillary forms.
Therefore, to better comprehend the factors related to restrictions in participation, it is necessary to analyse the contributions of the components of functionality, concomitantly considering the influence of the impairments, activity limitations, and environmental factors.
The rejection is the objective result of the application of the evaluation criteria of social and environmental barriers, body functions changes,activity limitations, and participation restrictions according to the conception of CFI.
The term functioning used in the ICF refers to functions, body structures, activity and societal participation; incapacity results from the interaction between the individual's dysfunction,as well as the limitation to his or her activities and restrictions to societal participation, and the environmental factors that may work as barriers or facilitators of their performing those activities and participation. .
The reality is that there have been changes and additions over time in the habits and customs of the churches, and many turned the Lord's Supper into a formal and empty ritual, sometimes a mere appendage to a service, andmade undue restrictions to the participation of believers.
Considering that the auditory difficulty generates restrictions of participation to the child in diverse activities of the daily one and the LSQ is an instrument that measures the auditory abilities, is inferred that the use of the auditory device will be able to promote changes in the auditory abilities of the deaf child 2, 16.