Exemplos de uso de Validly known em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
And if it doesn't exist, it can't be validly known.
They can never be validly known, and this is one of them.
So, what exists andcould therefore be validly known?
It can be validly known as an affirmation or as a negation.
Not like invaders from the fifth dimension,that can't be validly known.
It only exists andcan be validly known dependently on this basis.
The definition of something that exists is something that can be validly known;
What exists- what can be validly known- can be divided in several ways.
Buddhism defines existent phenomena as everything that can be validly known.
Our pie of what exists,what can be validly known, can also be divided into affirmation phenomena(sgrub-pa) and negation phenomena dgag-pa.
The corollary of this definition is anything that can't be validly known doesn't exist.
An imputed phenomenon, like a habit,is something that depends on other phenomena as its basis for existence and for being validly known.
According to the Buddhist presentation, if something exists,it can be validly known, either conceptually or non-conceptually;
In the discussion of what exists and what doesn't exist,what exists is anything that can be validly known.
Not-yet-happening 2010 is an existent phenomenon,can be validly known, but can only be validly known at a certain time- before it happens.
What doesn't exist can be known, for instance something impossible such as invaders from the fifth dimension, butit can't be validly known.
And all these- so a not-yet-happening body of a Buddha, a not-yet-happening speech andmind of a Buddha- all these things can be validly known because they can happen, even though they're not happening right now.
The second means of validly knowing something is by logic and inference.
However, we cannot validly know something that is impossible, because it is nonexistent.
Because we can validly know in this indirect way what is impossible, Tsongkhapa, the founder of the Gelug tradition, emphasizes"knowing the object to be refuted.
The solution is that we can validly know the appearance of something impossible, although we cannot validly know the impossible thing itself.
When we see an object,we can validly know"this is a glass" and we can also validly know"this is not a glass.
How do we validly know that anything is true?
So how do we validly know something that is impossible in order to know that there is no such thing?