Exemplos de uso de Weighted average export em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The weighted average normal value was compared to the weighted average export price to the Community.
However, as explained above, it is the Institution's practice to take normally into account all sales of the product concerned to unrelated parties in the weighted average export price.
The comparison of the revised weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price by product type on an ex factory basis showed the existence of dumping.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation,the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price to the Community.
The weighted average normal value per grade was compared to the weighted average export price of the corresponding grade of CCM at a fob port producing country level, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the Basic Regulation.
A comparison was made between the weighted average normal value and the weighted average export price on an ex-works basis.
The comparison of the weighted average export price with the weighted average normal value showed still the existence of dumping during the IP, the dumping margin being equal to the amount by which the normal value exceeded the export price expressed as a percentage of the cif import prices at the Community border, duty unpaid.
In order to calculate the dumping margin,the weighted average normal value was compared to the weighted average export price to the Community per product type.
According to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation,for each exporting producer the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price.
The weighted average normal value per product type was compared with the weighted average export price on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation,the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price of the product concerned.
The comparison, on a CN code basis,of weighted average normal values and weighted average export prices, revealed the existence of dumping, the dumping margin corresponding to the amount by which the normal value exceeded the export price.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation,the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price, at the same level of trade.
The comparison of theweighted average normal value, revised as appropriate, with the weighted average export price by product type on an ex factory basis, showed the existence of dumping for both investigated exporting producers included in the sample.
According to Article 2(11)of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price for each producer.
It is the Community Institutions' practice,in cases of non-cooperation to use the weighted average export price of the transactions with the lowest export prices, representing at the same time a considerable quantity of the export quantities with verifiable prices.
According to Article 2(11)of the basic Regulation the weighted average normal values were compared to the weighted average export prices for each of the three product types.
According to Article 2(11) of the Basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison between the weighted average normal value by type and the weighted average export price.
A comparison of each individual normal value ora simple average of the normal values from the complaint with the weighted average export price from Eurostat would not have provided a meaningful basis for a finding.
According to Article 2(11) and(12) of the basic Regulation,for each exporting producer the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price per product type.
For the company granted MET,the weighted average normal value of each type of the product concerned exported to the Community was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, as provided for in Article 2(11) and(12) of the basic Regulation.
The dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the company's weighted average normal value with its weighted average export prices per product type, as determined above.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation,the comparison of the weighted average normal value of each product type concerned exported to the Community to the weighted average export price of each corresponding type of the product concerned, taking into account the level of trade, showed the existence of dumping in respect of the co-operating exporting producers.
For the company granted MET the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the company's weighted average normal value with its weighted average export prices per product type, as determined above.
The cooperating companies objected to the Commission's decision to establish the dumping margin on the basis of a comparison of weighted average normal values with individual export prices(rather than weighted average export prices), arguing that the Commission had failed to provide sufficient justification for its approach at recital(21) of the provisional Regulation.
For the purpose of this investigation and on the basis of the cooperating exporting producers' replies to the questionnaire, the analysis focused on those categories for which there were also exports to the Community: categories A andC. For each category, a weighted average export price was determined per country of destination for all Chinese cooperating exporting producers.
The company objected to the Commission's decision to establish the dumping margin on the basis of a comparison of weighted average adjusted normal values with adjusted individual export prices(rather than weighted average export prices), arguing that the Commission had failed to provide sufficient justification for its approach at recital(34) of the provisional Regulation.
This argument is based on the conclusions reached by the WTO Appellate Body in the bed linen case(3) by which, on the facts of the case concerned,the practice of zeroing when establishing the existence of margins of dumping, which in that case was established by a comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price as established by the Commission, was found to be inconsistent with the Article 2.4.2 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation,the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned.
In accordance with Articles 2(10) and 2(11) of the Basic Regulation,the weighted average normal value per model was compared with the weighted average export price per model, at ex-factory level and at the same level of trade.