Ejemplos de uso de Be declared inadmissible en Inglés y sus traducciones al Español
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It accordingly requested that the petition be declared inadmissible.
They should therefore be declared inadmissible under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
In response, the Chilean State asked that the petition be declared inadmissible.
Any allegation or complaint shall be declared inadmissible by the competent judicial authority.
Due to these reasons,the Mexican State asks that the petition be declared inadmissible.
La gente también traduce
It considers that the complaint should be declared inadmissible as it is manifestly ill-founded.
In accordance with article 109 of theCommittee's rules of procedure(CAT/C/3/Rev.4), the State party requested that the complaint be declared inadmissible.
In view of the above, the State party considers that the case should be declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
Evidence may also be declared inadmissible in other instances in which it is obtained in breach of the requirements of the law of criminal procedure.
In this regard,the State party requests that the complaint be declared inadmissible ratione materiae.
The State party contended that the communication should be declared inadmissible with regard to the wife because she had not herself exhausted domestic remedies.
The State party further asks that the author's claim under article 2 of the Covenant be declared inadmissible ratione materaie.
In the State party's view, the complaint should be declared inadmissible in this regard on the grounds that domestic remedies have not been exhausted.
The State party submits that the allegations of the author under articles 9 and14 of the Covenant should be declared inadmissible for lack of substantiation.
Consequently, it submits that the claim under article 18 should be declared inadmissible, as a violation of this provision is outside the competence ratione materiae of the Committee.
It reiterates that the author failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his claims under articles 6 and7 and that they should be declared inadmissible.
If the child does not pass the competency examination, his orher evidence must be declared inadmissible for the purposes of the court proceedings.
At its fifty-sixth session, the Committee examined the admissibility of the communication andtook note of the State party's request that the communication should be declared inadmissible.
In the State party's view, all the communications,except that of Mr. Shams, should be declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
The State party concludes that the allegations contained in the author's communication are devoid of substantiation on even a prima facie basis and should be declared inadmissible.
The State party submits, therefore,that the communication should be declared inadmissible under article 3 and article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
Given the lack of evidence, or even an allegation, that Mr. O.E.V. and his collaborators were acting in an official capacity,the complaint should be declared inadmissible.
The State party considers that the author's allegations should be declared inadmissible, given that they are manifestly ill-founded and not sufficiently substantiated.
Since the complainants' claim under article 3 fails to rise to the basic level of substantiation,the communication should be declared inadmissible as being manifestly unfounded.
The State party concludes that for these reasons,the communication should be declared inadmissible and requests that the admissibility of the communication be considered separately from the merits.
The complainant has failed to substantiate her allegations andthe complaint should be declared inadmissible as being manifestly unfounded.
The Committee notes that the State party requested that this part of the complaint be declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of all available and effective domestic remedies.
In some cases, the Special Rapporteurs recommended to the Committee that the communications be declared inadmissible without forwarding them to the State party.
Since the complainants' claim fails to rise to the basic level of substantiation,the communication should be declared inadmissible as being manifestly unfounded.
The State party reiterates its observations of 26 April 2010 andmaintains that the communication should be declared inadmissible because of a failure to exhaust domestic remedies.